The Lass Word: Who Needs First Round Receivers?

Pack loads up on talent without them.

One of the most pleasant surprises of this Green Bay Packers training camp has been the depth and quality of the receivers. Thought to be a weakness going in because of inexperience, it is now becoming clear the team has a plentiful stable of young talent that is capable of getting the job done at this level.  

Saturday night’s preseason game against the Patriots provided further evidence. Romeo Doubs made a spectacular catch in the first quarter on a 42 yard bomb that was slightly underthrown by Jordan Love. Doubs was able to get up on the toes of his right foot, while dragging his left foot inbounds, all the while securing the ball while the defender contested the catch. The effort was so incredible, the nearest official couldn’t believe Doubs could make the play, and ruled it incomplete. It was reversed on appeal. 

Malik Heath was all over the secondary catching everything. He caught all five of his targets for 75 yards. His portfolio included a beautiful 25 yard grab on the boundary, a sharp slant for fifteen, another slant which converted a first down on third and seven, and a leaping grab in the midst of four defenders down the middle of the field for 25.  

Another rookie, Grant DuBose, ran a deep out, adjusted to a 21 yard toss from Sean Clifford thrown behind him, then absorbed a brutal hit which blew him over into a headstand and back flip, still holding on to the ball.  The play brought Green Bay out from deep in its own end. He finished with two for 27 yards. 

You already know about Christian Watson, who was not targeted Saturday night, but who is emerging as one of the best deep threats in the league. Samori Toure has been called one of the most improved players in camp. Jayden Reed caught a 20 yard touchdown strike from Love in the first quarter and has demonstrated the speed and route-running ability to be a dangerous slot receiver. And ever since the draft I have been touting rookie Dontayvious Wicks who may have as much or more talent than any of them. He just can’t seem to dodge the injury bug, and was sidelined again against the Patriots with a hamstring problem. Even late summer addition Cody Chrest has made a few eye-catching plays in practice. 

All of these receivers have something else in common besides being young talents. None of them are first round draft picks. Watson and Reed are second rounders, Doubs was a fourth round selection, Wicks was taken in round five, Toure and DuBose in round seven, Heath and Chrest are undrafted free agents. In admiring the quality of this group, I couldn’t help but think back to the drafts of the last two seasons.  

In 2022 the team had just traded away Davante Adams, and the draft was heavy with receiver prospects. The Packers had two picks in the first round and we fans were all but certain the team would pick a first round receiver for the first time since 2002. Alas, the top six receivers went off the board before Green Bay went on the clock, and Packer Nation seemed disappointed to settle for two defensive players (Quay Walker and Devonte Wyatt).  A trade-up in the second round led to the drafting of Watson. Doubs and Toure were added on day three. 

In 2023 many of us still felt the team needed another elite prospect at the position. When the Packers’ turn came up at pick thirteen, all the top receivers were still on the board, including Jaxon Smith-Njigba, Quentin Johnston, Zay Flowers and Jordan Addison. General Manager Brian Gutekunst passed on all of them, going defense again with Lukas Van Ness. By the way, all four of those receivers were drafted consecutively seven picks later. Instead, Gutey chose Wicks in round five and DuBose in the seventh. He then found Heath on the street, apparently after his 4.64 time in the forty scared the league from drafting him. 

Whatever angst Green Bay fans might have felt about the lack of first round receivers should now be assuaged. This team is loaded with promising young pass catchers that figure to grow and excel with Jordan Love. It would appear that receivers, much like running backs and guards, are no longer first round priorities. Of course, there are special exceptions, but for every Justin Jefferson and Jamar Chase out there, there are many more like Kadarius Toney, Rashod Bateman, Henry Ruggs and Jalen Reagor. 

Other thoughts about Saturday’s game: 

-- I was impressed by the offensive line play, both starters and back-ups. They gave up no sacks and few pressures. This against a New England team with a reputation for solid defense. Especially encouraging was the play of second year tackle Rasheed Walker, who played most of the game on the left side for the resting David Bakhtiari.  What a lift for this unit it would be if Walker develops into a starting level talent.

-- The Packers secondary is having a problem defending slants. Corners are allowing wideouts to cross in front of them and then struggling to make tackles. Promising rookie Carrington Valentine in particular was exposed in this way. Maybe experience will improve their instincts and timing, enabling them to be more disruptive on these types of patterns. 

-- If this was Samori Toure’s audition for the kick return job, it wasn’t very impressive.  He returned two kickoffs for 36 yards, two punts for three yards. He didn’t show much burst or vision. Keisean Nixon’s position as kickoff return man was not threatened, and Jayden Reed looks like a better punt return prospect. 

-- It’s pretty clear Sean Clifford has won the back-up quarterback slot. The Packers don’t seem inclined to give former USFL MVP Alex McGough much of a chance at meaningful playing time. Maybe that will change in the final preseason game. It would be interesting to see what the signal caller who led his team to a USFL championship can do at this level. But that seems unlikely now that Matt LaFleur has decided to play Jordan Love against the Seahawks.

-- Holy smokes!  That Anders Carlson 52 yard field goal would have been good from sixty.  The ball exploded off his foot like a stick of dynamite.  Carlson's consistency may be in question, but his leg strength is definitely not.

  

 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Ken Lass is a former Green Bay television sports anchor and 43 year media veteran, a lifelong Packers fan, and a shareholder.

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
16 points
 

Comments (101)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
greengold's picture

August 21, 2023 at 06:23 am

Doubs’ left toe drag through the entirety of his reception till he could bring the right toe tap, backwards, was other level.

Romeo Doubs continues to show up with big catches. Great to see.

Good piece, Ken. The abundance of WR talent is remarkable. No tests for these young players to pass, save for CTFB when Jordan Love throws it to them… and Love has no problem throwing to all of them.

I have the Packers keeping 7 WR - and they STILL have to stash Melton on IR/PUP!:

WR (7) Watson, Doubs, Reed, Toure, Wicks, DuBose, Heath

This is looking to be an embarrassing wealth of riches at the WR position, which is more difficult to fill than RB. I wound up taking Deguara off my 53 to keep Heath and DuBose. I also have Wilson beating out Taylor at the #3RB.

Really hoping Tarvarius Moore wasn’t injured too badly and that he can return to action.

The Packers cleared a lot of “dead wood” off the roster, and IMO, Savage is the last of it. Possible trade at cut downs to 53 (Savage or Patrick Taylor for Micah Hyde?)… Another option is replacing Savage with Balentine, keeping 6 CB and 4 Safeties.

Trading for Hyde a temporary fix until GB can draft Safeties in 2024. I’ve studied the Hyde scenario, and it’s possible.

I’m perfectly happy rolling with the rookie, Johnson Jr. & Owens as our starters until Moore can return.

OFFENSE (25)
QB (2) Love, Clifford
RB (3) Jones, Dillon, Wilson
WR (7) Watson, Doubs, Reed, Toure, Wicks, DuBose, Heath
TE (3) Musgrave, Kraft, Allen
OL (10) Bakhtiari, Jenkins, Myers, Runyan, Tom, Nijman, Walker, Jones, Rhyan, Telfort

DEFENSE (25)
DL (6) Clark, Wyatt, Slaton, Ford, Wooden, Brooks
OLB (6) Gary, Smith, Van Ness, Enagbare, Hollins, Cox Jr.
ILB (3) Campbell, Walker, McDuffie
CB (5) Alexander, Douglas, Stokes, Nixon, Valentine
S (5) Savage, Moore, Johnson Jr., Sapp III, Owens

SPECIAL TEAMS
K Carlson
P Whelan
LS Orzech

3 points
8
5
TKWorldWide's picture

August 21, 2023 at 06:33 am

“CTFB” took me a second, but I got it. LOL

6 points
6
0
greengold's picture

August 21, 2023 at 06:40 am

An old friend of mine from back when Packers forums first started screeching, blinking & honking through 14.4 modems went by CTFB.

I’m using it in his honor… he was a former DB, and funny AF.

0 points
3
3
Ferrari-Driver's picture

August 21, 2023 at 09:59 am

In my line of work acronyms are like another language and once in a while I will run across one which had an entirely different meaning but fits the bill in both cases.

That old "GG" I think is full of them. Good guy.

2 points
2
0
greengold's picture

August 21, 2023 at 11:42 am

If acronyms are “it,” then yes, I’ve been told that many times.

ROFLMAO

LFG GPG AGNFB

0 points
1
1
Ferrari-Driver's picture

August 22, 2023 at 12:05 pm

TK quote: “CTFB” took me a second, but I got it. LOL

TK, You must be 20 times smarter than I; the first time I saw "GG" use that one, it took me at least 20 seconds or more to figure it out.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

August 21, 2023 at 07:30 am

Your 53 is pretty close to mine. It's hard to justify keeping 10 O-linemen when they only suit up eight on game day, and Telfort should be safe on the practice squad. So I guess I would keep Deguara instead, although I'm not sure what he really is. All I can figure is that maybe the coaches have some plays up their sleeve with Deguara lined up in the backfield, and they are waiting until the regular season to use those plays. I would not be sad if he got cut.

On defense, I would be inclined to keep Eric Wilson, who is a good special teams player and has had a nice camp. Sapp looks more like a practice squad player at this point. With Stokes probably starting the season on PUP, they could roll with Tariq Carpenter or Dallin Leavitt at least for awhile.

"The dearth of WR talent is remarkable." I think you meant "depth," not "dearth." I'm guessing you were victimized by the aggressive autocorrect feature on this site.

4 points
4
0
greengold's picture

August 21, 2023 at 08:54 am

Thank you, Greg! Changed it out.

Like yourself, I'm liking what I see from both Eric Wilson and Jimmy Phillips. They seem to keep making plays, though Phillips rolling up on Moore's left leg was very unfortunate, and could happen to anyone at game speed. I was telling TGR last Thursday, the guy I keep seeing making plays is Jimmy Phillips at ILB. He appears to have good size, speed, power and instincts for the position.

I'm finding McDuffie improved from a year ago, but still caught out of position or taking the wrong angles to finish some plays. I'm questioning my only keeping 3 ILB too. Doesn't sit right.

Carpenter is a guy I had high hopes for, and maybe they IR him with the intent to possibly bring him back later... ???

Deguara is tough only in that he was essentially a gift to LaFleur by Gutekunst, who took him 2 rounds too early to secure him for his HC, having given up his R4 in the Jordan Love trade up to #26. I have not seen anything positive in his play since his knee injury that makes me think he is a must for retention on our 53. He's so slow now, and maybe we just realize the player we drafted just isn't able to return to his former level of play.

1 points
2
1
Guam's picture

August 21, 2023 at 07:57 am

My 53 is pretty close to yours GG. I have Telfort and Dubose on the PS with Taylor at RB (4 RBs) and a fourth TE (blocking TE picked up from waiver wire). I think the Packers will be more run oriented this year and that will require a blocking TE and a fourth RB.

2 points
3
1
greengold's picture

August 21, 2023 at 10:48 am

Guam, I'm right with you, but... I'm SUPER HOPEFUL that LaFleur employs true heavy OL sets, throwing an extra OL into that mix for short yardage plays. The old U-71 should be alive and well in GB this season.

2024 should be a good draft for OL, TE and S. Thinking we bolster those positions then.

I really don't see Austin Allen as that legit in-line TE. I see him more as a Musgrave backup. Maybe they add a 4th after roster cut downs, but, I don't see the need, really. Shove an OL in there as an eligible, and we pretty much have Big Dog, without the BD price tag of $2M.

As for a 4th RB, yeah, I've thought about going lighter only at OL - keeping 9 instead of 10. I would hope they are firm with 6 DL and 6 OLB. Especially with Gary coming back from injury. We've got about as much great talent at OLB as we do at WR. I've never seen the Packers this deep in pass rushers. Ever.

Seems to me that the Packers have always been too light keeping just 5 DL, and it really shows in the playoffs. We need to stop the run, and Jonathan Ford has shown he belongs. He should only get better if they employ a solid 6 man rotation. For the first time in forever, we have the players to do so.

TRENCHES.

0 points
2
2
T7Steve's picture

August 21, 2023 at 11:29 am

"Shove an OL in there as an eligible, and we pretty much have Big Dog, without the BD price tag of $2M."

I want to see Jones outside of Nijman and see who can stop us from getting 2 yards when we need it.

I mentioned Jones next to Nijman last week and everyone thought I meant guard and tackle.

It's ALL about the TRENCHES!

1 points
2
1
greengold's picture

August 21, 2023 at 11:45 am

I want to see that! Absolutely, Steve.

-1 points
1
2
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

August 22, 2023 at 03:06 am

Telfort is iffy for me. He can't play in 2023, so it is a question of whether anyone would poach him. I like Telfort as a developmental guy. TBH, I haven't seen enough of Caleb Jones, either. Waiting on events.

I have no interest in keeping 5 safeties. Keep one of Sapp or Owens (I like Sapp a bit better as a long-term developmental guy, but again, this is about which player might slide onto the PS more easily).

That said (written?), I could live with your selections.

3 points
3
0
HarryHodag's picture

August 21, 2023 at 06:42 am

I've gone off on this many times before, but I've been saying the 'first round superstar' idea is pure concocted hogwash spoken by overpriced media personalities and has little to do with reality.

Fans swallow this crap like it's manna from heaven. It sounds good: pick a wide receiver in the first round and it's off to the playoffs for sure!

The Vikings Justin Jefferson is a good example. He was a first rounder and is undeniably outstanding, but where are the Vikings? For every first rounder who is good there are many, many, lower round picks who are really good too.

The Packers all-time leading receiver is a 7th round pick, Donald Driver.

That's why 'tanking' drives me nuts. So a team is supposed to lose a bunch of games on purpose so they can draft one good player? When you're in that position you're better off trading back and getting more picks so you can rebuilt the WHOLE team.
Reed was poo-poo'd by the 'experts' before the draft and now it looks like he's going to be steal as slot receiver.
Anyone deny Christian Watson is going to be good? Romeo Doubs? Funny, but neither player was a first round pick.

6 points
10
4
egbertsouse's picture

August 21, 2023 at 07:20 am

Teams don’t tank for receivers, they tank for QBs.

9 points
9
0
HarryHodag's picture

August 22, 2023 at 08:06 am

..just ask the Browns and Baker Mayfield....or the Cardinals and sure-fire All-Pro Kyler Murray.

1 points
1
0
DoubleJ's picture

August 21, 2023 at 07:21 am

I don't know how many times I've said on forums that R1 is not where you want to draft a WR or RB. WR and RB just aren't super premium, or in RB case a premium, positions. There just isn't the value there for one no matter how good he is. Look at the Lions when they drafted Calvin Johnson. He is a HOF WR but yet never really moved the needle on how good the team was. In R1 you are looking for players at a position that will give the most value and that means QB, OT (specifically LT), Edge, CB, and maybe IDL. WR is easy to find in R2 and since 2010 more WRs have made the Pro Bowl from R2 than R1. In fact as of 2021 or 2022, I don't remember what year it was, R1 only had 1 more Pro Bowl receiver than R3.

3 points
4
1
LLCHESTY's picture

August 21, 2023 at 11:33 am

Weren't the Vikings in the playoffs last year?

1 points
1
0
HarryHodag's picture

August 22, 2023 at 08:07 am

..and lost.

1 points
1
0
ImaPayne's picture

August 21, 2023 at 11:46 am

The Vikes were 13-4 last year thats where they were and in the playoffs. They also picked a first round receiver this year so now they have two big weapons.
I guess they feel thats how you win with fast talented receivers who cant be covered. What a strange idea.
As for Watson who wasnt a one pick, he really hasnt shown much.
Last time I saw him play he wasnt running away from anyone.

-3 points
1
4
CheesedDeadHead's picture

August 21, 2023 at 03:56 pm

"I guess they feel thats how you win with fast talented receivers who cant be covered. What a strange idea."

It is a strange idea for the GBP because it was a key component of the Detroit Lions during the mid 2000s where they took a WR with their 1st (1st round) pick 4 out of 6 years and couldn't turn that into even a division championship. Now you tout the Vikings and where exactly has having a top WR got them so far? How has all that investment got them? A really good offense and arguably the leagues worst defense. From 2015 to 2017 the Vikings had an excellent defense and their record in that 3 year window was the best for any 3 consecutive years during the 2000's. How is throwing draft capital at WR going to improve that crap defense?

Yeah bringing up ideas from the Vikings and Lions is novel to Packer fans because those organizations have no Super Bowl wins among them, ever. I think that's the blind leading the blind...

2 points
2
0
HarryHodag's picture

August 22, 2023 at 08:07 am

...huh?

1 points
1
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

August 21, 2023 at 03:57 pm

Yes, you tank for a top QB, but in tanking you pick higher in every round, not just the first round. And that can make a difference.

2 points
2
0
HarryHodag's picture

August 22, 2023 at 08:08 am

...and you lose a bunch of games to bring in a couple of high-pick rookies...

look at history and tell me ALL number one picks become great players.

1 points
1
0
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

August 21, 2023 at 05:28 pm

Your point about 1st round receivers is a good one, but having higher draft picks is absolutely a good thing. While receivers can usually be found throughout the draft, the 4 true impact positions (QB, LT, CB, Pass rush) are typically found in the first round and the best of the best are usually top 10 picks. Not to mention, youre not just getting a higher first round pick, youre picking earlier in every round. It makes a huge difference. Remember when the Packers were drafting late 20s every year for a decade and suddenly the team lacked talent across the board? This is why. Theres only so much talent to go around.

2 points
2
0
Starrbrite's picture

August 21, 2023 at 07:28 pm

Yep—agree. Good receivers are a dime-a-dozen.
Go Packers!!!

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

August 21, 2023 at 06:44 am

Re: first round receivers: Who was it that said “god only made so many 300 pounders”? I think it stands to reason that there are fewer talented big guys than smaller guys (like receivers), so GB prioritizes big over small in rd 1. (And probably throughout the draft as well, but rd 1 is always under the biggest microscope.) BTW, “big microscope” is kinda akin to “jumbo shrimp”, but I’ve digressed enough here.

Also, colleges are throwing more than ever, so even non-first round receivers are more experienced and polished than years ago.

Thirdly, maybe receivers are a position that GB just has a knack for scouting well.

However it all adds up, GB looks to have replenished its receiver corps.

GPG!
AGNFB! (That’s for you, GG!😉)

10 points
10
0
LeotisHarris's picture

August 21, 2023 at 08:30 am

'..... “god only made so many 300 pounders”? '

Truth, TK, but anecdotal evidence gleaned from crowd shots at Lambeau suggests DIY kits developed by human hands are creating an ample supply.

13 points
13
0
greengold's picture

August 21, 2023 at 08:43 am

LOL!!! Clad in old Rodgers jerseys. (Hey, I've got one myself.)

0 points
1
1
Since'61's picture

August 21, 2023 at 08:45 am

Leotis - a box of cookies for you on that post. That's the best laugh I've had from here in a while.
Thanks, Since '61

4 points
4
0
greengold's picture

August 21, 2023 at 09:18 am

Same. The "anecdotal evidence gleaned,"... pure comic genius.

1 points
2
1
TKWorldWide's picture

August 22, 2023 at 07:22 am

Someone out there ain’t in the mood for nuthin’ funny!

2 points
2
0
greengold's picture

August 22, 2023 at 07:25 am

Whomp MF’n Whomp.

LOL

1 points
1
0
TKWorldWide's picture

August 21, 2023 at 08:54 am

You got me!
Let’s amend that to “athletic” 300 lb’ers!

5 points
5
0
T7Steve's picture

August 21, 2023 at 02:08 pm

I resemble that remark!

I may be big, but at least I'm slow.

4 points
4
0
greengold's picture

August 21, 2023 at 02:25 pm

I love the smell of burning tires in the morning...

LFG GPG AGNFB

0 points
1
1
dobber's picture

August 21, 2023 at 03:50 pm

It doesn't matter where you find guys who can play--early in the draft, late in the draft, free agency, under the blue light--just find those guys.

2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

August 22, 2023 at 07:34 am

Yes, it’s not where a player is picked it’s how good a player you pick. Statistically, there’s very little difference in production between first and second round receivers by year 3. PFF did a study in this. The first round has more truly elite but also has the worst busts.

“In a receiver’s rookie year, those drafted in the first round on average outperform those drafted in the second round. However, once receivers are several years into their careers, the differences between the groups nearly converge. By this point, the first-rounders are nearly evenly split into groups that, on average, outperform second-rounders and those that do not. However, there is slight speculative evidence that suggests waiting to draft a receiver in the second round is safer than selecting a specific type of receiver in the first.”

https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-first-round-wide-receiver-production-compar...

1 points
1
0
ReaganRulz's picture

August 21, 2023 at 06:49 am

Having talent is obviously a requirement and having good relationships with your teammates and good team culture is a very close 2nd. The talk all off-season has been around JLove’s ability and effort to work with his young receivers and do it in a motivational way.

I can’t help but think that this culture helps the youngsters just go out and do their thing and not worry so much about having to woo and impress a veteran QB like Rodgers.

8 points
11
3
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

August 21, 2023 at 04:00 pm

Wooing and impressing (not what I would call it) has made millions of bucks for those that did it and put GB in the top tier of offensive teams for a very long time. I mean, despite his high standards and not being best-friends with #12, Watson and Doubs were both pretty dang productive as rookies last year. While playing with a guy with a broken thumb. JLove will do it his way, but Rodgers made the careers of a lot of middling WRs.

1 points
1
0
jannes bjornson's picture

August 21, 2023 at 04:17 pm

Players, not Plays...

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

August 21, 2023 at 07:01 am

The loop hole to your thinking is speed.
If they can't stretch the field. You Lose.
Cheap shots will happen. And injuries.
The packers have preferred big Wrs.
And good character is the main ingredient.
IMO it looks like TT started the trend.
Believing that draft mistakes happen at WR.
But the Hall of Fame guy still is a #1.
And the Wrs now days, are the best athletes.
So while our guys may have the chemistry.
It's still takes the right stuff to be a Legend.
And with a HOF qb the last 20 years.
The packers can take the unknown later.

-3 points
5
8
TKWorldWide's picture

August 21, 2023 at 08:01 am

I get the speed thing, for sure, but Davante sure wasn’t a burner. But I DO agree that there’s gotta be a threat from somewhere in the receiving corps. Remember a few years back when Jordy got hurt? The passing game really bogged down and the loudest explanation was the remaining receivers lacked top speed so defenses could clamp down without the fear of having the top taken off.

(BTW I got in trouble at Mardi Gras a few years ago due to that last bit.)

6 points
6
0
stockholder's picture

August 21, 2023 at 10:36 am

Devante ran 4.55. And when he changed his shoes.
The time improved.
The Draft Guru's stated,
" he must attach himself to Rodgers".
But Nobody expected him to improve his cuts.
So much speed and shiftiness off the Ol.
Jordy slowed Down. And he got slower when
they moved him in the slot. $$$$ forced him out.
Adams also was left handed. Which made
Nelson more replaceable.
The biggest thing was to throw at it.
And Adams then improved his hands.
The Offense slowed down with the loss of Finley.
And later James Jones. Adams was it.

0 points
4
4
T7Steve's picture

August 21, 2023 at 01:09 pm

"could clamp down without the fear of having the top taken off."

Did you clamp on, or remove one?

I didn't think you could get in trouble for anything at Mardi Gras?

1 points
1
0
TKWorldWide's picture

August 21, 2023 at 03:15 pm

Apparently I’m not as buff and ripped as it takes…
I just wanted the damn beads!

3 points
3
0
ReaganRulz's picture

August 21, 2023 at 06:05 pm

Ummm, sure? You must be a disciple of Al Davis Sr. All of our WRs are fast. As are most WR’s in the league. And I wanna say that we have at least one guy that can “stretch the field” but I may be mistaken!! Forgot the guys name!!

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

August 21, 2023 at 07:16 am

The thing about Aaron Rodgers not having first-round receivers to throw the ball to was such a load of crap. He had a lot of talent to work with at that position throughout his career, at least until last year, when the bottom fell out. Watson and Doubs were rookies, which limited their impact, and both of them had injuries. It was a rare bad year for wide receiver talent in Green Bay, but it looks like they have bounced back quickly.

I'm getting the impression that Jayden Reed has a lot of poise for a rookie. He appears ready to play a big role in the offense immediately. I think he has already sewn up the punt return job. With Nixon returning kickoffs, Toure is being trained in as the backup for both the punt and kickoff return duties. I agree that he hasn't been particularly impressive. The coaches will be okay with him as long as he hangs onto the ball.

I've been hearing about Malik Heath ever since minicamps began, and now I can see why. He totally looks like an NFL receiver. I'd like to see him get some time with the starters, but the position may be too crowded for that to happen, and there probably won't be many starters from either team playing in the final preseason game. Heath belongs on the roster and so does DuBose. The Packers would really have a dilemma on their hands if Bo Melton was healthy. I don't want any of these guys going to the practice squad and getting snatched up by the Bears.

7 points
9
2
Since'61's picture

August 21, 2023 at 08:49 am

All Toure needs to do if he does fill in for KR or PR is signal for a fair catch. There is no longer any need for him to return anything. Thanks, Since '61

3 points
4
1
T7Steve's picture

August 21, 2023 at 02:10 pm

Wouldn't hurt to catch it too. Be an improvement on the start of last season.

2 points
2
0
egbertsouse's picture

August 21, 2023 at 07:17 am

I’m not putting any of these guys in the HOF until I see them play in a few real games. I’ve seen too many of these “August All-Pros “fizzle out in September . Time to pump the brakes a bit.

11 points
12
1
T7Steve's picture

August 21, 2023 at 07:53 am

That's no fun! LOL

1 points
1
0
Since'61's picture

August 21, 2023 at 08:54 am

I agree completely egberthouse. Let's wait and see what these can do when the hype, propaganda, speculation season is over and the real games begin against #1 DBs and defenders. Another issue which includes Watson and Doubs is can they healthy for the entire season. Thanks, Since '61

3 points
3
0
cheesehead1's picture

August 21, 2023 at 11:23 am

Agree. The receivers and Love have looked pretty good, but it’s still preseason. I’m optimistic but we won’t know for sure until the regular season.

4 points
4
0
RCPackerFan's picture

August 21, 2023 at 07:22 am

Packers have done a tremendous job drafting 2nd round WR's from Thompson to Gutey.

The 2 newest 2nd round WR's from Gutey look like they are our present and future. Watson brings a very unique skillset that will give us someone teams will fear. Reed is slated to be the slot WR, but he has already shown that he can be a dynamic WR. There were some doubting the pick of Reed in the 2nd round. He is already proving those doubters wrong.

The WR position is stacked with talented players from top to bottom. The first 3 spots are set with Watson, Doubs and Reed. The question is who are the WR's going to be after them and what order. I think Heath is pushing for WR4. Wicks will be on the roster (assuming his hamstring is ok). That is 5 WR's. Toure, Dubose, and Melton are likely fighting for 1-2 spots.

Other thoughts about Saturday’s game:

offensive line play:
It was eye raising to me when they started Walker over Yosh at LT. I heard a few people talking about why. Some thought that it was to basically to see how Walker would do against starting caliber players. Umm, sorry but they wouldn't be starting him at LT with Love at QB just to see how he would do. They aren't going to risk anything to Love by experimenting. So my question is, if Walker has surpassed Yosh, are they considering trading Yosh?
Tom is the starting RT. I thought the OL as a whole was really good. Rhyan is a guy to keep an eye on inside.

Samori Toure’s audition for the kick return job:
Something I started to wonder during the game was are they giving Toure one last chance to earn a roster spot by having him playing return man? They already have their top 3 WR's. Wicks and Heath appear to be 4 & 5. DuBose has really emerged. Were they trying to get Toure to shine in some way?

It’s pretty clear Sean Clifford has won the back-up quarterback slot:
Clifford has a bit of Favre in him with the gunslinger mentality. He has looked really good in preseason games imo. He has quieted most doubters and has displayed the ability to make the game look fun. I have no clue what he will do against top level talent, but going into the season I am comfortable with him as the top backup. He has a gamer mentality that makes you feel like if he has to play you have a chance to win.

Anders Carlson:
"That 52 yard field goal would have been good from sixty."
I feel like that kick was majorly needed for him. He kicked a great game and absolutely nailed that kick. While he is a rookie and will need to keep working on his consistency, he has shown that he can drill any kick. How many kickers hit 50+ yarders and make it look as effortlessly as Carlson did on that kick. He looked like he was kicking an extra point and easily could have made that from 62.
Something to remember with Carlson is that the Packers are patient with Kickers. Crosby in his rookie year was 79%. After his rookie year he went 79%, 75%, 78%, 85% in his first 5 years. For his career he was 81%.

The Packers will be patient with Carlson.
Us fans need to be as well!

7 points
7
0
Coldworld's picture

August 21, 2023 at 07:43 am

Toure had his best punt return of the night negated by a penalty that didn’t seem to really affect the return. When looking at how he did individually, that’s misleading to ignore. He’s actually been pretty effective on kick returns over the last two games.

In any case, I would be shocked if Nixon isn’t our primary kick returner and Reed seems likely to be the primary returner in punts. What I see is Toure getting experience as the in game replacement. So far he’s seemed pretty reliable. A lot better position to be in than last year at this time.

4 points
4
0
RCPackerFan's picture

August 21, 2023 at 08:14 am

And for the record I'm not saying Toure isn't making the roster or anything. But something I was starting to wonder while watching was how safe his position is on the 53.

Nixon and Reed will be the top 2 returners. Before he got hurt Goodson appeared to be ahead of Toure as a return man also.

Right now too it will depend on the health of Wicks, but I can see Heath possibly being our number 4.

1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

August 21, 2023 at 08:51 am

Goodson has to make the team and that’s open to question with Wilson and so many WRs. I’m a fan if him for the option role, but Reed is going to do most of that, so even if Goodson makes it, he’s quite probably inactive.

Toure is likely to be. He seems to be the guy next up almost anywhere, at least that’s how I see his use this summer, as opposed to having a set position. Whether he’s the 2nd best returner if either kind on the 90 is not really the question. It’s whether he’s the second best available and reliable in game day.

I like Heath, but I don’t think he’s a do everything athlete. He’s certainly not going to be a returner as I see it. He’s your X and big slot/Lazard, if that’s not Wicks, behind Watson/Musgrave

1 points
1
0
RCPackerFan's picture

August 21, 2023 at 09:08 am

I really like Goodson. Its too bad he got hurt when he did because I really wanted to see him more this preseason.

I believe Toure likely factors into the 53. But with the play of Heath and the comments that LaFleur has made of him being goonish (or whatever the actual comment was), it really makes me wonder if they are more high on him. He does some things that Lazard does.

I think ultimately they keep 7 WR's. I think they keep Watson, Doubs, Reed, Wicks, Heath, DuBose and Toure. Then the PS maybe Melton and Chrest?

Regardless of who makes it and not. I really like the group overall.

0 points
1
1
greengold's picture

August 21, 2023 at 10:26 am

Goodson has some great offerings as a skill player, running with the ball and catching out of the backfield or in formation. Guessing his jet concept use would be a plus as well.

However, Emanuel Wilson looks like the superior player overall between the 2. He's been known to be a good blocker, solid in pass pro - though we have yet to see that - whereas Goodson brings neither trait. Wilson also has EXCEPTIONAL ATHLETICISM, plus strength. Wilson is also a reliable target as a receiver out of the backfield.

Wilson was clocked at just under 22 mph in CIN on his TD run.

Personally, I find him to be the superior runner to Patrick Taylor, and I think GB should train EW up with some FB reps.

2 points
3
1
greengold's picture

August 21, 2023 at 08:07 am

I agree with all of this, RC. Toure looks to have really upped his game Year 1 to Year 2. Clifford is looking like the real deal, and Carlson is beginning to show why Bisaccia & Gutekunst liked him so much. We need to play the long game with him, and Carlson may surprise us all this season.

0 points
1
1
RCPackerFan's picture

August 21, 2023 at 10:09 am

I have seen a lot of talks about Love and Clifford and how apparently there are some people that think Clifford should start over Love? I don't know if that is real or not, but I have seen a lot of people talking about seeing that stuff.
But regardless, just the fact that there is even a conversation about that to me tells me people really like what Clifford has done. He has certainly impressed me.

0 points
0
0
greengold's picture

August 21, 2023 at 10:19 am

Clifford has shown himself to be what we might consider a very capable QB2. They committed the draft capital to his selection for many reasons, including having the maturity, leadership and wherewithal to take over for JL in case of emergency, without much drop off. That's always the goal for a backup QB. GB pulling this off through the draft took a lot of scouting and study by all of Gutekunst, LaFleur & Clements. They know their stuff.

The way the Packers have shunned veteran FAs in favor of their rookie additions is impressive, and they pointedly went out to fill both QB and WR with the best possible additions to this team.

3 points
3
0
Coldworld's picture

August 21, 2023 at 11:06 am

Toure is in the unenviable position of backing up everywhere and not getting to play anywhere consistently. It’s a tough ask for a guy who’s only in year 2 and hardly played. I’d like to see him play with the starters. I think Doubs could have a day off.

That would give Toure a chance to get in some rhythm and do so in a fan visible practice. It would also be wise because he will probably be in the field with Love this season. I’d say the same of Heath, Dubose, and Wicks/Melton to a lesser extent if either are healthy. They may hide Dubose though, if they know that they intend to stash him.

1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

August 21, 2023 at 08:00 am

I’m not as impressed with our starting OL in the run game, except that I did think Runyon was better. The real run success came after all but Walker left.

It seems I’m not the only one with those doubts. PFF reflects them. Runyon was rated our best run blocker and OL by far, grading at 87 overall. Walker did well, particularly in the pass game, but Jenkins scored well below expected in the run game.

However, the standout from PFF was an atrocious grade on Tom in the run game and a just average pass rating. PFF rated Tom at 32 overall and his run performance well below that, for them he was our worst player on offense by some way.

Once Nijman came in with the power house of Newman/Hanson/Myers. things actually improved. All of Wilson’s plays and Taylor’s TD were behind that line. Interestingly, given the Pats largely being unchanged initially, the pass pro remained good.

This bears some looking at further to review, but I think Saturday makes it harder to justify Tom at RT as the best use of him, or our best RT. We may be buying a narrative here and not looking at what’s actually happening acutely enough.

The good news is Runyon, Rhyan holding up in pass pro and Walker generally. The bad news is that this game raised real questions about perceived personnel wisdom. It seems to suggest RT isn’t the best place for Tom and he certainly wasn’t our best RT on the night, or even the second best T.

4 points
5
1
greengold's picture

August 21, 2023 at 09:38 am

My thinking is our GM believes Tom's best position is C. Given that, LaFleur & Co. has to have worked Tom there behind closed doors, where neither the fans nor the media can see their intentions.

Let's add that giving Tom RT reps in TC helps to expand his offerings in case he's needed at one of the OT positions. Tom's grades in the NFL have never really been anything but bad per PFF, which I have questioned often, specifically their grades.

We've been told they're doing a lot of other personnel options/groupings/plays in closed practices. Why not Tom at C? If they are guarding that switch for what, 2-3 series in each of 3 preseason games? Fine. As a fan, I don't need to know, now. Game 1 will be just fine for me. That's all that matters really, the regular season games, and seeing that they've made their best adjustments.

Coldworld, your concerns that they haven't are in the back of all of our minds.

Despite that, I think our best OL has Yosh Nijman starting at RT. Bakhtiari at LT, with Jenkins, Tom and Runyan rounding out the middle. As TGR pointed out, NONE OF US have actually seen that, nor know it to be true. There is a chance that Runyan's play is improved regardless of who is playing next to him, but, it might be far improved with Myers replaced by a more capable C, where we have seen Tom play with the 2s/3s.

It could be Bakhtiari, Jenkins, Myers, Runayan and Nijman is our best OL. Jordan Love himself might feel that is the case. If not, they should be working Tom at C. LaFleur and his staff should be making these decisions, but I could see input from Gutekunst and Love possibly factoring in as well.

Judging from Love's comments on the botched shotgun snap Saturday, my sense is he's far more confident in Myers than the fan base.

I have no clue how it will shake out, but, I do believe we are in better shape along our entire OL than nearly all the other NFL teams at this point, and we're likely more ready to handle any required changes that present, with the players we have at hand.

3 points
3
0
LLCHESTY's picture

August 21, 2023 at 10:44 am

I think they could have helped themselves by playing Tom with the 1s at C and getting Myers some snaps at G with the 2s. Maybe Myers shows he's a better option at G than Newman and Rhyan. It's probably a bit late for that but with the snapping issues maybe they still give it a try.

1 points
2
1
Coldworld's picture

August 21, 2023 at 11:16 am

I’ve gone back and rewatched quickly. Live, I thought Tom was fine. In fact I was doing Runyon a disservice. PFF are closer to the mark. Runyon was good in the run game, which is exciting! That would be a huge boost. Tom, unfortunately was decidedly not.

Watching a little with Nijman even with Rhyan in for Runyon, they were a better right side in pass as well as run. I did think Rhyan played better than he has before, particularly against the pass. On that game, the Tom as RT narrative doesn’t hold up at all. There no doubt Nijman was better against the same Pats players.

It’s just one game, but this OL plan looks on a par with the Newman Hanson stroke of genius, just that Tom is a better player even in the wrong role. Tom is plugging the wrong role for him and in light of this roster based on Saturday.

1 points
2
1
LLCHESTY's picture

August 21, 2023 at 11:42 am

Just based on practice and game rotations it does seem like Nijman is getting the short end of the stick. Maybe they're satisfied they know what they have in him and want longer looks at the others against the 1s. I just hope it's not a monetary thing like some are suggesting and he's on the trading block.

0 points
1
1
Coldworld's picture

August 21, 2023 at 11:51 am

He might be on the block. That’s one way to read this. My concern is that this is based on a flawed assessment of others. I just don’t trust Butkus’ record in personnel evaluation.

1 points
1
0
greengold's picture

August 21, 2023 at 12:52 pm

LL, I agree with you and think the Packers do know exactly what they have in Yosh Nijman, both as a LT or RT. He's also really good on either side.

He should come in at a reasonable price tag in keeping with his years of service, and I believe both the Packers and Yosh feel good about getting this done.

The delays in getting another deal put together probably hinge on a whole pile of deals they have been projecting. Love, Nijman, Gary, Runyan and Bakhtiari are all possibly in the process of having their extensions put together.

That's kind of why I'm looking at some of our higher priced players who remain rostered, wondering if they will make this 53. I could easily see Newman, Savage, Hanson, and possibly one or two more figuring into providing a bit more cap space to make the deals above possible.

0 points
1
1
LLCHESTY's picture

August 21, 2023 at 02:13 pm

Savage gets paid if he's on the roster or not and I don't see anybody taking on that deal unless you give up capital for them to do so.

1 points
1
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

August 21, 2023 at 04:22 pm

Were the guys that did a better job later in the game playing against 2nd and 3rd stringers? Or were they playing against the same crew the starters were? That makes a big difference. I don't think the narrative of Tom at RT gets determined based on one preseason game. He held up pretty well in real games filling in last season.

0 points
0
0
Razer's picture

August 21, 2023 at 08:08 am

I am glad that we have this much optimism about these young receivers. And, I agree that first round price tags on these guys and RBs is not good value. I will curb my enthusiasm on the crop until at least two bona fide NFLers emerge. At this stage, every fan base is giddy with their rough diamonds and draft steals. I expect to hear about the lack of separation and raw route running as we get into the regular season. Let's just hope that we have good enough coaching to develop these guys into weapons for Love.

5 points
6
1
x24's picture

August 21, 2023 at 08:24 am

"The Packers secondary is having a problem defending slants" Come to think about it- I can't remember the last time we fielded a defense where the slant was not a liability.

The situation has not improved since Barry took the wheel- keystone cops secondary, followed by finger pointing...

I thought the players met with Barry, and agreed to adjust the system? No?

4 points
4
0
greengold's picture

August 21, 2023 at 09:50 am

We are in preseason selling custard stand vanilla in August.

2 points
2
0
x24's picture

August 21, 2023 at 09:58 am

But you practice how you play

2 points
2
0
jont's picture

August 21, 2023 at 02:09 pm

"But you practice how you play"

Yes.

The Patriots hit a lot of slants-- I thought 10 or 11. Where was the adjustment? I'm guessing here... did Barry want to to see if the DBs could improve and cover it better? Hard for me to figure. I'd have thought you call for some inside technique so that a quick hitter gets 5 or 6 when the receiver has to go outside rather the 10-15 when he slices up the seam. Puzzling.

2 points
2
0
dobber's picture

August 21, 2023 at 03:56 pm

If you have receivers who run them--slants--well (remember Driver and Jennings?), you run them a lot.

0 points
0
0
x24's picture

August 22, 2023 at 09:25 am

Especially when facing a defense that seems to have no answer

1 points
1
0
mrtundra's picture

August 21, 2023 at 08:42 am

I'm looking for more playing time for Grant DuBose. I think he has a bright future. He'll probably make the PS, this season, due to all the WR talent we now are blessed with. Malik Heath, IMO, just made the 53. Samori Toure being called "one of the most improved players in camp," doesn't mean much when he was doing all the return duties, in the last preseason game. To me, it looks like the Packers are searching for a way to keep him and STs may be his home rather than being, primarily, a WR. Again, look at all the WR talent Green Bay has acquired. Anyone hear from Jadakis Bonds, Bo Melton, Dre Miller, Duece Watts or Dontayvion Wicks, lately?

0 points
2
2
greengold's picture

August 21, 2023 at 09:54 am

Wicks went down with an injured hamstring Saturday against the Patriots, but I did see him make one helluva block that I noted earlier. Really a bummer, mrtundra, because he has had a phenomenal TC prior to injury. Hope it isn't serious.

Both Melton and Wicks might find themselves IR'd to protect them on our roster, as those hamstrings do take time to heal. IMO, we're going to see that kind of stashing of WR talent with this much readily apparent on our roster.

1. Watson
2. Doubs
3. Reed
4. Toure
5. Heath
6. DuBose

That is looking pretty solid. Being able to keep only 6 WRs on our roster would be really helpful, while securing some others via PUP/IR, as it all adds up. That might allow us to keep both Taylor AND Wilson at RB. Maybe a 4th TE. Maybe a 5th Safety...

Trenches are so key, and so valuable, I think it best that we keep 10 OL, 6 DL and 6 OLB. We all saw what a lack of pass rush did to us last season when Gary went down.

I'm hoping Moore is OK and can start Week 1. If we make any trades, I suspect it will be for a Safety, possibly Micah Hyde. The Bills are in a numbers game at S with young talents ready to step in, while being in need at both WR and RB. Seems like they may make a good trade partner, and they know our roster already, given the AJ Dillon crush they have in trade rumors that have been swirling in the ether for weeks.

0 points
1
1
Coldworld's picture

August 21, 2023 at 10:59 am

If you IR them now, they are done for the season. We can keep them for next year (but that’s extra cap) without practicing this year. If you want them on the 53, you have to give them a spot and then move to IR, risking 2 others you may want to retain. If we waive them injured, will someone claim them to put in their 53? If not they revert. It will be interesting to see how they handle these questions.

2 points
2
0
greengold's picture

August 21, 2023 at 03:12 pm

THANKS for this, Coldworld.

We could wind up with a crazier looking INITIAL 53 to start as a result... For instance, maybe keeping just 2 TE and 2 ILB would allow us to pull something like that off.

Did you know the freaking COLTS have 9 TEs on their roster..??? WTAF???

Jelani Woods

Mo Alie-Cox

Kylen Granson

Will Mallory

Drew Ogletree

Pharaoh Brown

Michael Jacobson

Nick Eubanks

Ricky Seals-Jones

0 points
0
0
davekenya's picture

August 21, 2023 at 10:55 am

If we look at 'best at their position' and draft pick number, there is some truth that at least the top 5 players at WR weren't all #1s:

JJ - round 1
D Adams - r2
Stefon Diggs - r5
Tyreek Hill - r5
AJ Brown - r2

What I wouldn't have thought is that if you want to have one of the top 5 players in the league at his position, use you're #1 pick at RT (while top qbs are likely r1 picks -- all but r2 Hurts -- there are more r1 qb bust picks). Top 5 RTs in the league:

Lane Johnson - r1
Tristan Wirfs - r1
Penei Sewell - r1
Ryan Ramczyk - r1
Brian O'Neill - r2

4 points
4
0
greengold's picture

August 21, 2023 at 01:32 pm

davekenya, you're speaking my language!!!

According to a study I often reference around draft time, Offensive Line in R1 has an 83% success rate, where success is determined to be a player who started at least half of their career. R2 is almost as good with a 70% success rate, while R3 40% and R4 29% are considered to be pretty good.

The most OL drafted by round to fewest are in this order: R7, R6, R5, R4, R3, R1 and R2.

As for WR, the bust rate is tied for the worst of all positions in R1 with DL. R1 success rate is 58% while R2 is 49%. The highest quantity of WRs are selected in R3, with only a 25% success rate.

The most WRs drafted by round to fewest are in this order: R7, R3, R4, R6, R2, R1 and R5.
--

Safest picks in R1 are OL (83%), LB (70%) and TE (68%) - all 3 have the lowest bust rates...

Likely to have the same amount of success picking a WR in R1 as you would R2.

QBs seem to be R1 or bust.

DL in R4 have a higher success rate than DL in R2 or R3.

Oddly enough, TEs have a very reasonable chance of turning out to be a success in most rounds, except R7, where TEs have a 0% success rate.

DBs provide the best success potential in R7 compared to any other position.

1 points
1
0
NitschkeFan's picture

August 21, 2023 at 02:52 pm

Dave, while I agree that "value" of a 1st round pick is probably not best used on a WR, you are really limiting your data. Over the past 10 years or so there are some All Pro WR's from later rounds but many many are 1st and then 2nd rounders are next.

Justin Jefferson 1st rd, 22nd overall
Ja’Marr Chase 1st rd, 5th overall
CeeDee lamb 1st rd, 17th overall
Calvin Johnson 1st rd, 2nd pick
Demaryius Thomas 1st rd, 22nd pick
AJ Green 1st rd, 4th pick
Dez Bryant 1st rd, 24th pick
DeAndre Hopkins 1st rd, 27th overall
Julio Jones 1st rd, 6th overall
Odell Beckham 1st rd, 12th overall
Mike Evans 1st rd, 7th overall
Calvin Ridley 1st rd, 26th overall

AJ Brown 2nd rd, 51st overall
Jordy Nelson 2nd rd, 36th overall
Michael Thomas 2nd rd, 57th overall
DK Metcalf 2nd rd, 64th overall
Deebo Samuel 2nd rd, 36th overall
Devante Adams 2nd rd, 53rd overall

How about the "best" WR I personally have ever seen?
RANDY MOSS 1st rd, 21st pick
JERRY RICE 1st rd, 16th overall

How about the best Packer WR I have ever seen?
STERLING SHARPE 1st rd, 7th overall
JAMES LOFTON 1st rd, 6th overall

(probably can slide Davante Adams in here too, but I have trouble separating the quality of QB and trying to isolate WR talent, pretty impossible for me really)

Not old enough to have seen Hutson :)

You can massage the data all you want but there are plenty of ways to quantify that the best players tend to get drafted earlier. So sure Antonio Brown was a multiple time All Pro picked in the 6th round. But the bulk of the best WR's come in the early rounds.

3 points
3
0
davekenya's picture

August 22, 2023 at 12:44 pm

I agree with you - what I showed is simply what are considered the top 5 today at their position and draft position. Partly, it was an exercise I could do in a reasonable amount of time (6ish hours) of looking at all positions, draft position, and more.

To be most accurate, we'd want to look at some random time block - say 20 or 25 years - and look at all the data then condense it down into a few understandable generalizations. But, this would take a lot of time (20+ hours) and I had a hard time actually finding data to do it.

I have hardest time generalizing from a few specific individuals anyone mentions as 'proof' one way or another on a topic -- as there's such selection bias occurring.

0 points
0
0
PackEyedOptimist's picture

August 21, 2023 at 11:00 am

I'm pretty excited about this year's roster options. At this point, I think it would be wise to only have Jones, Dillon and DeGuara as RBs on the 53, with several more on the PS, in order to keep the top 7 WRs. However, I could easily see Wicks going on IR/PUP with the hamstring. To me, that would be PERFECT. He could eventually overtake one of the starters, but needs more time.
I'm SUPER excited to see that DuBose is looking just like he looked on his college tape. I honestly think he could be the best of ALL of our WRs--he just looks so incredibly smooth and athletic while also having perhaps the best hands of all of them. We seriously have the ability to field three starting-level pairs.
Toure is like the "sixth man" in basketball (or offensive line); he's going to be Mr. Reliable.
Rasheed Walker is sort of like Brenton Cox in my opinion. He was a flyer on a boom-or-bust. So far, both are booming! Walker has incredible physical tools for an OT; it's a huge bonus if he gets everything else squared away.

1 points
1
0
greengold's picture

August 21, 2023 at 11:23 am

Really great thoughts here, PEO. However, I question Deguara quite a lot. I just haven't seen him outperforming some bubble players at other positions.

Melton & Wicks finding more time in system, having suffered recent hamstring injuries, would benefit from placement on IR - and would be eligible to return to the team this season in case of injury elsewhere at WR.

Grant DuBose is exactly as advertised. Super small Div II program, even for Div II... but, his coaches put the word out that you've got to see this kid play. Judging from the little we've seen, the draft notes I took on him are beginning to look pretty representative of his skill set:
--
Pick #256 WR Grant DuBose - Charlotte (32nd WR taken)
6-2 201 4.57, hands 9 1/2”, wingspan 78”, vertical 35”, broad 110’ 5”

+size, + frame, + length, +fluid, +++ routes, +contested catch - OWNS the ball. Rare dropped pass. +balance, ++++TOUGH.

Plays bigger than he is with natural ball skills. +adjusements mid-air. Body fluidity route runner with immense catch point talent. Jump ball weapon. Zone beater.

YAC, STs!!! >>> PR (8.4 yds/att), Punt Coverage tackle machine.

--

I'm looking forward to a big dose of Grant DuBose v. SEA, Saturday at NOON CT!!!

2 points
2
0
PackEyedOptimist's picture

August 21, 2023 at 06:36 pm

I only keep DeGuara because he’s the only guy who can fill as both an emergency RB and a TE/FB.

1 points
1
0
greengold's picture

August 21, 2023 at 07:06 pm

Oh, I get it. Just a week or so ago I was mentioning to LH that Deguara was a lock! Lol. However, that line of reasoning was based upon theory, and what the original intent was in bringing him here.

He’s noticeably slower. I don’t like saying that, but I think it’s true.

Really just wondering if we’ll see that play, or those plays from him that make you say, “YES!”

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

August 21, 2023 at 11:09 am

Watson certainly looked like he belonged in the 2nd half of last year and now we'll see how he adjusts to being the focus of opposing defenses. 16 players had 17 or more explosive receptions last year with Jefferson leading the pack with 28. George Pickens was one of the 16. Watson had 8. With his skill set he needs to get into that 17-20 range of explosive receptions in order to be considered a true #1 WR.

I also wouldn't poo-poo using 1st round picks on WRs. Of those 16 players 9 of them were 1st round picks and one was Travis Kelce(TE). The Packers have done a great job finding talented WRs in the 2nd round but that's not a normal track record around the league. Either way it's hard to generate explosive plays without explosive players and the Packers certainly look better stocked in that department than they have in awhile.

4 points
4
0
LambeauPlain's picture

August 21, 2023 at 11:15 am

The General Manager of Player Personnel has again delivered a solid roster for O, D, and STs to the Head Coach to make into a football team. The young WR room has to be one of the most talented since the heady days of 4 wide with Jennings, Jordy, Cobb, Driver.

However, to pump the brakes a bit on the WRs, my sense is this year the ground attack will have increased priority including plentiful snaps with 12 personnel. I see the need to bolster the roster at OL, RB and TE. And the run D MUST improve its bottom of the barrel standing from last season.

So with the 53 I can see 3 RBs, 4 TEs and 10 OL and 6 DL in the rotation (keep the big boys fresh to plug the run lanes in the 4th quarter!).

7 WRs would be a luxury for team that figures to pass less, run more. They could probably get by with 5 WRs but expect 6. Right now Watson, Doubs, Reed, Heath and Toure (STs add to his value). But if Wicks hamstring is ready he could be #6.

I could be wrong but I believe Walker starting at LT may have been a confirming move to see if moving Tom to C would be less risky in case of an injury at either T spot.

Walker answered he's ready to be the #3 T behind Bakh and Yosh. I remain concerned the IOL with Myers and JRJ as the weakness of the line...and Tom at C could make it much stronger with synergies with Jenks and JRJ (or Myers if he is the better RG).

-1 points
0
1
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

August 21, 2023 at 11:19 am

This is certainly an exciting group; Doubs is showing the growth we'd hope after a promising display of talent as a rookie. Watson as well. The rest we shall see about. GB has had a ton of guys show up in preseason that faded out when games began. Preseason defenses are not game-planning to stop anyone in particular, so it will be some time before we truly know what we have. But it sure seems like Gutekunst made the right choice in not bringing in veterans at WR/TE so they could see how the young players grow into their roles and perhaps even shine.

2 points
2
0
greengold's picture

August 21, 2023 at 11:32 am

Totally agree, WCPB.

I like that this young core at both WR and TE get to grow together within the system. Didn't really see any advantages to bringing in a veteran who might have had more to unlearn.

-1 points
0
1
ImaPayne's picture

August 21, 2023 at 11:55 am

I come from the mindset, players with size, speed, agility, and strenght that played in Div I at the top schools come into the league being coached up by the best so they have a better knowledge of the game, conditioning and played against top talent so why not pick them first?
I aslo think and its just my opine that once you get beyond that 15th pick your beyond the creme of the crop for that year. The very best choices are gone. To me a receiver picked at 26 isnt much better then the 10th in round two. Thus it comes down to where you pick in a round as much as who. Your not getting a premier pass rusher with the 29th pick.
Undrafted and 7th rounders are there for a reason. If you truly need them to fill holes your in trouble, usually money trouble.

0 points
1
1
LLCHESTY's picture

August 21, 2023 at 02:19 pm

The Minnesota school systems don't teach you're and your anymore??

3 points
3
0
CheesedDeadHead's picture

August 21, 2023 at 04:17 pm

They also seem to not teach the old saying of when you "assume" you can make an "ass" out of "you" and "me".

1 points
1
0
jont's picture

August 21, 2023 at 02:16 pm

Doubs' catch on that long ball was pure talent. Now he needs skill.

Skill is learned, and John Kuhn got it right in talking about that play during the broadcast: Great catch, yes, but a bad route. He is supposed to take it up the outside of the numbers and then fade to the boundary as the ball comes down in order to give himself room to make a comfortable grab and keep the CB away. He made it really hard on himself.

Beautiful throw, by the way.

3 points
3
0
PhantomII's picture

August 21, 2023 at 09:36 pm

Who needed 1st round WR's...."WE DID" from 2018 to now...when AR and GB was in the Super Bowl window. The general idea is a #1 WR is ready to produce with a savvy route tree day 1. Sometimes a raw WR with high up-side will out produce these #1's over a career as their skills and abilities mature. The biggest thing GB was missing on offense the last several years is a legit #2 WR who had an ascending skill set to be an outright #1 WR himself along side DA. I am presently more than happy to roll with what we have at WR and we have a group that will be able to burn a lot of teams defenses. We have a lot of speed and athletic ability and a QB1 who will spread the ball around. Doubs will be the primary possession WR and may even be a #1 WR. Watson will be a special #1 WR when he gets his routes polished a bit and gets more separation from breaking off his routes more crisply than pure speed. Reed be looking good also. A couple late round fellas really showing something also. I'm really looking forward to these fellas making their mark on the NFL with JL. I think we could roll out any of the 5-7 anytime and move the chains at will. Gute has really been working the prospect list and getting some great looking WR's. Add the TE's and RB's into the mix and this is going to be a formidable offense. GPG

0 points
0
0