Ask Maggie: The Good, the Bad, and the Fine
By MaggieLoney
Welcome back to another edition of the mailbag, where you send me your questions and I…answer them. It’s hard to believe we’re less than one month away from the 2026 NFL Draft. The offseason really does fly by. This mailbag does, too, so let’s jump in.
“Reading the mail about naming rights to Lambeau I thought about MLB. The teams have sponsored patches on their jerseys. I’d rather see that than a name or brand on Lambeau. Is the jersey thing up to individual teams or would it have to be league wide approval by the NFL? I’m guessing the latter. Thanks.” - David
Hi David! You’re right that it’s the latter. It’s an NFL policy to not allow brands on team jerseys in regular season games. You probably have seen the Bellin Health patches on Packers jerseys during training camp, though, so teams do wear brand patches during the offseason program. Only NFL partners are allowed to show their branding. Players can wear equipment/products from other brands, but they have to remove the logo.
The NFL is the highest-earning sports league in the world. Every aspect of the game ties into sponsorship in some capacity. I feel like, at some point, brand patches will eventually wind up on NFL jerseys. And I do agree with you that I’d prefer that to “Lambeau Field presented by…” on the facade. But I’m going to appreciate Roger Goodell and the league leaving jerseys alone for as long as possible. There are already how many commercial breaks per game? How many pieces of marketing material and brand deals inside each individual stadium? The Packers may need to find creative ways to keep up with the rest of the league down the line, but it won’t be through jersey branding (at least not how the rules stand now).
“Heading out of free agency and into the draft, I am apprehensive about a couple of things. Can you rank these by what you think is most likely to happen: A) The special teams will not be bad, B) The cornerbacks will be fine, or C) The offensive line will be good?” - Tony
Oh this is fun. If we’re going strictly pre-draft so we aren’t thinking the Packers will have any extra bodies in any of these rooms, I’ll start with C and say I think it’s most likely from this list that the offensive line will be good. Zach Tom will be back healthy at right tackle. Jordan Morgan will finally have the opportunity to play the position he played for his entire collegiate career and will no longer have to take snaps everywhere (he played every position but center in 2025). Aaron Banks looked better as the season progressed and he got healthy. Sean Rhyan started to come into his own at center and looked like a better fit there than guard. The only question left to me is Anthony Belton who’s still developing as an interior player, but I think he’s the first candidate for the right guard job unless the Packers draft a lineman early.
Next I’ll say A, that special teams will not be bad. But this is tricky because I look at special teams in multiple parts. The addition of Skyy Moore really excites me. He has true field-flipping potential and the ability to make a house call at any moment. That’s going to dramatically impact the groove the offense is able to get into, being able to start drives with better field position. The flip side of this is that I’m not confident in Brandon McManus. He was 100% on field goals inside 39 yards but only 6-of-12 on kicks longer than 40 yards. Fifty. Percent. In a league where some kickers make 60-plus yards look automatic. But if it truly was all injury-related for McManus, maybe he has a bounce-back year and performs better in 2026. Daniel Whelan is still on the roster and he’s a superhero, so I’m cautiously optimistic.
That leaves B, that the cornerbacks will be fine. In this very column I wrote about Benjamin St-Juste and why I liked him as a free agency addition. That said, I still have a lot of concerns with that room as a whole. Nixon led the team with 17 passes defensed but also gave up some of the most memorable (for the wrong reasons) touchdowns of the season. I feel better about him being out there than Valentine, though, and I suppose that says something. It felt like towards the end of the season the Packers kept trying to bench Valentine, but then whoever replaced him would get hurt and he’d end up back out there out of necessity. Nate Hobbs was released. So that leaves the Bo Melton experiment at cornerback (he literally didn’t take a defensive snap in 2025), Kamal Hadden who’s recovering from injury, Shemar Bartholomew, and Tyron Herring (both undrafted guys) as the only other corners on roster. I would certainly think corner is a position they target early in the draft, and they may still look to free agency (Micah Parsons is still working out with his buddy Trevon Diggs). But as the roster currently stands on paper, cornerback is by far my biggest concern.
“Hey Maggie! With the bulk of free agency in the rear view mirror, are you holding out hope for anyone in particular? Or is it simply “on to the draft”? Thanks!” - Jim
I personally have started turning my attention to my draft deep dive and falling in love with prospects that will never end up in Green Bay. But there’s plenty of talent out there after the first few waves of free agency! DJ Reader is taking visits, and he’s a more prototypical nose tackle. I know the Packers made a move to sign Javon Hargrave, but he was always going to operate more as a pass rusher than a space-eating run stuffer. Not that Reader can’t rush the passer, too, it’s just that he fills more of that traditional NT role. Trevon Diggs is interesting if the Packers could bring him back as a low-cost option. Dan just wrote an article about that. The only other position I could see them actually kicking the tires on would be a veteran presence at edge rusher. Micah Parsons might not be able to come back until October, and that doesn’t leave a ton of depth in the room. It’s Lukas Van Ness, Brenton Cox, Arron Mosby, and second-year players Barryn Sorrell and Collin Oliver. Even if you like the upside of some of those guys, that’s a lot of snaps to fill before Parsons returns. And signing a veteran on a one-year deal isn’t going to prohibit Green Bay from drafting an edge rusher or giving those snaps to Sorrell if he outperforms the vet. But it’s nice to have an extra body on the depth chart that’s seen their share of NFL action.
The next time we have a mailbag, the Cheesehead TV Draft Guide will be out! Make sure you grab your copy on April 2nd so we can chat about draft prospects you love, loathe, and long to see in Green and Gold. And as always, send any questions you have to [email protected]. See you next week! Buy the Draft Guide!
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Maggie Loney is a writer for Cheesehead TV and podcaster for Pack's What She Said. Find her on Bluesky at @MaggieJLoney.
__________________________




Comments (17)
stockholder
March 27, 2026 at 12:11 pm
While everyone is staying positive about Parsons.
I wonder if he can dominate again.
After all- David Ojabo and Jaylon Smith were never
the same after college.
And Kraft might never be the same either.
Look at Bahk.
Are we taking to much for granted?
Coldworld
March 27, 2026 at 12:31 pm
There’s never complete certainty, but Bakh’s problem was the additional damage and complications from treating them. As far as I know, neither Kraft nor Parsons incurred significant collateral injury. One thing that may be true is that their immediate athleticism may be temporarily diminished. That is one reason why we need to have other players able to contribute at both positions, not just for their absence.
SicSemperTyrannis
March 27, 2026 at 02:59 pm
Full recovery from ACL has become a sure thing. If you want to worry, Zach Tom's injury has still been a hit or miss type. We have a LOT riding on him returning to 100%.
golfpacker61
March 27, 2026 at 07:58 pm
Jaylon Smiths knee injury was catastrophic and he damaged everything in the knee, Parsons injury was about as good as it can be. Not apples to apples.
Most knee injuries are a routine fix now, not like 50 yrs ago when I tore mine up and they just took all the damaged ligaments out and said see ya. Kraft will be fine. Bahk just had wore out knees.
Oppy
March 27, 2026 at 10:49 pm
Beyond the severity of the injuries as others have noted, a major difference between Bakhtiari and this current group of injured is age and the amount of wear and tear on the body he had endured.
David played substantially more football and those years of abuse play a major role in how the body handles recovery. Kraft and Parsons are literally in the prime of their athletic life.
I agree, however, that you never know with injuries. That being said, so long as they don't try to go too hard too soon (a real concern considering their aggressive attitudes) Kraft and Parsons should make near 100% recoveries. Tom is more a concern.
Since'75
March 28, 2026 at 01:25 am
Well said.
dobber
March 28, 2026 at 08:20 am
I was reading that Parsons, in the midst of his recovery, is leading a camp for some of his edge defender colleagues: Barryn Sorrell, Collin Oliver. Apparently working on strength and conditioning, hand-fighting, etc. (where are YOU, LVN?) There's some talk that week 4 might be his return game, and that the Packers may struggle with PUP list decisions. At this stage, I wouldn't be surprised if he's participating in drills by the end of camp, making the PUP decision moot.
golfpacker61
March 28, 2026 at 09:24 am
Krafts injury and missed games really highlighted the weakness in the TE group. While I really like what Josh Whyle brings to the team, he should be a TE3 for GB, when in fact he is as good as Musgrave at this point. Kraft is a perfect all around TE who has great hands and is a strong blocker. Musgrave is a fair receiver when he plays, but has no YAC, and is a fair blocker.
We have alot of needs and not enough picks, If we could land 2 more mid-round picks, we could add a TE like Sam Raush, Tanner Kozeil, or Marlin Klein. They are more well rounded TEs than Musgrave. I would look to move Musgrave before the draft, gain a pick and replace him with 1 of the above. KC needs TEs.
gsd3
March 28, 2026 at 12:30 pm
I like Dallen Bentley.
Since'75
March 28, 2026 at 01:18 am
Once again...Jordy led the league in TD passes (1,200 plus yards) the season he came back from ACL surgery.
Peterson came back from ACL/MCL surgery and immediately ran for over 2,000 yards.
There are enough success story's, not to have defeatist attitudes about it imo.
I'm worried far more about the roster, than i am of Parsons.
In Parsons i Trust
dobber
March 28, 2026 at 08:21 am
I think people might be surprised how many draft prospects have had ACL repairs in their past.
Since'75
March 28, 2026 at 10:04 am
Yes sir.
SicSemperTyrannis
March 27, 2026 at 03:12 pm
Maggie, good job with this column so far!
I'd love to see Diggs back in our CB room, if he's cheap "enough." (Whatever that nebulous term means; we should be able to re-sign at least #9 11 and 85. Cap increase is huge)
I can't help but think that Micah's ACL is related to his lack of off season work, plus quick ramp up to hellatious workload in season. Per snap he puts in about 10x as much effort as anybody else, and he's going to miss this off-season, too. While I understand MLF hating the idea of him being off the field, I don't think he should be playing 60 snaps per game this season. Which is to say that a veteran DE/OLB sounds like a REALLY good idea!!
I'm a fan of literally everybody else in that room, and beyond excited about them working with Micah's specialist; hopefully LVN will go that route, too. Even so, if there's any position where fresh legs via rotation makes sense, this is it. Isn't it established NFL wisdom that "you can't have too many edge rushers?"
I'd still weight improving our O line as more directly related to more wins. And of course we have no idea what Gannon will do with the DEs we've already got. There's a lot in flux for having so many returning players ...
Guam
March 27, 2026 at 05:18 pm
I hope the Packers can afford DJ Reader. I would rather not go into the season with Stackhouse and Ford as the "veteran" nose tackles accompanied by a draft choice at NT. The Packers would likely be soft up the middle again and subject to big backs gashing them up the gut. I saw enough of that against the Ravens and Eagles last season.
Reader plus a day two draft choice at NT would really help the run D.
dobber
March 28, 2026 at 08:33 am
IMO the Packers need to be looking both immediate and long term at the DL room. Wyatt, Ford, and Brooks are on expiring contracts. Hargrave is on a two-year deal, but he's been cut each of the last two off-seasons, and some Packers writers expect he'll be cut by the Packers next off-season. They have control of Brinson (first contract) and Stackhouse (ERFA and RFA) for three more seasons if they want them.
How many guys do you draft? How many do you keep on the 53? Who do you smuggle to the practice squad? Do you burn an early pick on a guy who probably is only a situational or run-down DT? If I had to guess, the Packers will lean into Stackhouse or some other FA/UDFA run-stuffer (maybe someone like Reader) not yet on the roster, try to stash Ford on the PS, and use their draft picks to find players who profile to replace Wyatt and/or Brooks: players that are not usually found as UDFAs and are expensive to buy on the FA market.
They have several position groups with longer term needs. Gute will have a tough time balancing those needs in the upcoming draft.
Since'75
March 28, 2026 at 10:14 am
Yea Dobs, i wonder about Hargrave.
Initially, i liked the signing.
But when two teams pass on you in as many years, it makes me wonder.
With that said, we have him and i'm hoping he can be a positive influence, on the field and in the locker room.
golfpacker61
March 27, 2026 at 08:30 pm
Decent O-line free agents are hard to come by, in hindsight Rasheed Walker would have been a great buy @ $4 million as a B- backup. Maybe 2 in the draft if we can trade for some extra picks, I like Tey Zuhn & Logan Taylor. Both play OT & OG, Zuhn projects to OC.
Special teams will be better, period. I personally am thrilled with the signing of Skyy Moore, he will give our offense shorter field, but I think he will also find his WR skills that he didn't show in KC because of injuries. He is a wild card this year.
The CB room is a mess because we have ignored it for 3 years and lost starters in Alexander, Stokes & Rasul Douglas. The Hobbs deal was a nightmare that should have never happened. We needed boundary help & Gute got us a slot. Stop putting square pegs in round holes!!!!!!! Yes, to Diggs IF IF IF he is healthy and cheap. A prove it deal for him is NOT $6-7 million per year, it is $2 million plus incentives to get to $4 million. Prove it means just that. Or just sign Rasul Douglas after the draft
for $3 million.
As far as other free agent signings, I am praying that Clowney is still available after the draft so we can sign him for $5 million and no comp loss. Depending on what we do in the draft, I would love to see Calais Campbell in Green Bay after the draft, but only if we don't pick 1 of the NTs, Caleb Banks, Lee Hunter. or Darrell Jackson.
RB needs help but I like both practice squad RBs Pierre Strong-faster & Damien Martinez-bigger.
TE is a weak position too, not just because Kraft is recovering. Whyle is a good TE3. Musgrave is not a good TE and we should explore a trade to replace him. Good ones in draft where we will pick one after round 4, are Sam Roush, Kozeil,Tanner & Marlin Klein. Raush & Klein solid all around TEs, Kozeil has 200 career catches.
Predictions and hopes for 2026, GOOD HEALTH for a change, and the Packers finally winning like the contender we are supposed to be. GPG!!!!