Confessions of a Polluted Mindset - My One and Only Mock Draft - 2026
The Weekly Packers Brain Drain from Jersey Al.
By JerseyAl
Here it is, the content you've all been waiting for! Ok, maybe not, but you're going to get it anyway. It's my annual futile attempt to predict what Brian Gutenkunst is going to do. It was a lot easier when Ted Thompson was making the picks - I had some pretty good success back then. My general approach is this - try to determine what positions will provide good value in which rounds, sprinkle in positions of need and then choose the player that best fits the Packers scheme and team personality.
The "my one and only" term is technically not true, as I do a seven round Packers mock draft for the CheeseheadTV Draft Guide. But what you are reading now is the only one out there for public consumption. Doing a mock draft in March is very different than doing one just before the draft. Back then, you haven't been influenced by the preponderance of draft content we get blasted with in the 3-4 weeks leading up to the draft. Perhaps not coincidentally, my record with the Draft Guide mock drafts has been much better than my draft-eve mocks. In this year's draft guide, my pick was EDGE Zion Young. I did so even though I don't think the Packers are going to prioritize the position this early in this draft. They currently have six players on the roster at that position, including development guys like Sorrell and Oliver.
So for this mock, my early picks focused on what I believe are the primary needs for the Green Bay Packers - and that is DT/NT and cornerback. Gannon's 3-4 defense is going to need a nose tackle and the only options on the roster are two UDFAs - Jonathan Ford and Nazir Stackhouse. Adding a Dsay 2 talent would seem to be a very good idea. As for the cornerback position, probable 2026 starters Nixon and Valentine will be free agents after this season and good candidates to be allowed to seek better money elsewhere. St-Juste was brought in to add some depth to the room and compete for a starting job, but overall, the CB room desperately needs to be added to and in my opinion, early and often.
Here we go...
Second round, No. 52 Christen Miller, DL, Georgia - While a cornerback would be my preferred choice here, I feel like the first two CB tiers will have been emptied by pick 52. So I turn my attention to the defensive line, especially with run-stopping and nose tackle possibilities. Miller is an athletic big man with power and a high motor. He played approximately 30% of his snaps at nose tackle but checks off the "versatility" box. He hasn't shown much of a pass rush, but with Wyatt and Hargrave in the DL room, that's not what is needed. Besides, perhaps that helps him fall into the Packers' lap at pick 52.
Third round, No. 84 Daylen Everette, CB, Georgia - I didn't set out with the plan to bring two more Georgia Bulldogs onto the Packers' roster, yet here we are. Everette is my favorite CB prospect not named Chris Johnson. He's a Senior Bowl attendee and a three-year starter at outside cornerback in the SEC, an impressive feat on it's own. Everette has the size, speed and explosion measurables the Packers want and has experience in multiple coverage roles, including Cover 3, quarters and press man. He is also a willing and effective tackler, which solidifies the choice for me.
Fourth round, No. 120 Josh Cameron, WR, Baylor - A former walk-on, Cameron is not a speedster, but rather a physical big-bodied possession receiver that's a red zone demon (19 TDs over his last two seasons). His dropped pass rate is under 2%, and he would serve as a nice contrasting addition to the WR group. Cameron has also returned kickoffs and punts, leading the nation in 2024 with a 20.7 yard punt return average. Finally, he's a Senior Bowl attendee and a beast of a downfield blocker, something the Packers need to add back to their WR room.
Fifth round, No. 153 Ephesians Prysock, CB, Washington - As promised, it's time to double-down on the cornerback position. Down in the fifth round, you're looking for players in need of development with the athletic traits you like. He's 6'3" tall with an 80" wingspan but doesn't show the stiff hips of many tall, lanky cornerbacks. A senior Bowl attendee, Prysock started 42 games as an outside cornerback over three seasons, playing mostly in zone concepts. Prysock can also initially help out on special teams, as he has played on punt coverage and return teams.
Fifth round, No. 160 Diego Pounds, OT, Ole Miss - Pounds is the choice here basically because I think he's could be a real sleeper in this draft. An offensive tackle in the SEC who gave up 0 sacks on 550 pass blocking attempts last season? Sign me up. He has plenty of size and length (6'6", 325 lbs, 83" wingspan) and the quick feet needed to start at tackle in the NFL. However, if for some reason he isn't able to handle being out on an island, he could move inside and make a hell of a guard.
Sixth round, No. 201 Jamari Taylor, RB, Virginia - The popular pick in this spot has been RB Kaelon Black, but I prefer Senior Bowl attendee Taylor. Black has an injury history, can't block and was rarely thrown to. Taylor is a yard-after-contact demon with only two career fumbles, He displays natural pass-catching ability and is a willing blocker. He's a more complete player that can do many things for you as a backup running back.
Seventh round, No. 236 Dallen Bentley, TE, Utah - It's time to add a true in-line tight end to this Packers roster and Bentley fits the bill. He's a big-framed, above-average blocker and last season found his niche as a receiver. He can sit down in a zone and if you get him the ball, it's a catch (0 drops last season). He ran a 4.62 40 yd, so he's not a plodding type despite his size. Overall, he has a nice combination of traits to further develop.
Seventh round, No. 255 Michael Heldman, EDGE, Central Michigan- Heldman is a small-school late bloomer who showed serious pass rush potential in 2025. He's a hot motor guy, with all-out effort and some already-developed pass rush moves. He ran a 4.70 40 yd and had a 40" vertical at the combine. Heldman is a potential diamond in the rough worth spending your final pick on.
If you would like to support CheesheadTV, It's not too late - you can order our draft guide here. If you already have, I thank you profusely!
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
"Jersey Al" Bracco is the Editor-In-Chief, part owner and wearer of various hats for CheeseheadTV.com and PackersTalk.com. He's a lifetime Packers fan living in the land of the Giants (and Jets). Follow Al on twitter at @JerseyalGBP.
__________________________
Comments (119)
Cheezehead72
April 22, 2026 at 06:36 am
Al I vote for you to be the GM for the draft. I like these picks. Yes I know that once the draft starts anything could happen from Gute and more so from the 31 other GMs. So even if we think we should pick a player he may not be available and then there is that guy that Gute did not expect who is much better and he cannot pass up.
I do think that Cameron is a reach in round 4. Looking at your description and the NFL Prospect has him as a 6th round pick. I Gute could wait on him and move the next three up being as they would have to drop to us. The last two may not be there in the 7th.
But overall I would be happy with these picks.
JerseyAl
April 22, 2026 at 08:07 am
The consensus board and Ourlads Draft Guide has Cameron as a round 3-4 pick.
gsd3
April 22, 2026 at 11:35 am
I think he brings something to the room that they don't have. Would like to get him a round later, but if they like him, best not to snooze.
Like your draft!
Lphill
April 22, 2026 at 06:42 am
I like Miller but if there's actually a starting caliber corner still on the board I think we go corner.
JerseyAl
April 22, 2026 at 08:09 am
I agree. I originally had Brandon Cisse as my pick but talked myself out of his still being there.
Coldworld
April 22, 2026 at 08:38 am
I think taking a NT like Miller who can disrupt on passing downs makes sense given the depth of CB options on this draft. If no such NT was available I’d look to trade down for an extra pick.
JerseyAl
April 22, 2026 at 09:03 am
I think a trade down from 52 is very plausible if one of their primary targets is not there. Trade down 10 spots or so and pick up another fifth rounder, maybe?
Since'75
April 22, 2026 at 06:44 am
"It was a lot easier when Ted Thompson was making the picks - I had some pretty good success back then"
So did the Packers.
I loved big Ted. He had some big balls grabbing Rodgers, that one pick alone was legend.
Not to mention all the O line Pro Bowlers he drafted in the 4th and 5th rounds (EPIC)
I always said, Ted's best was the 1st half of his tenure in Green Bay.
Until the Board stepped in, and had to tell Murphy to do his job and make a move with Ted, about 3 or 4 years too late imo.
I have mad respect for both Wolf and Ted.
They had laser vision, building their own rosters, and winning championships.
As far as the draft, i think mocks, this and that is all fools gold, even more so is....'experts' grading teams drafts days after it takes place...i just laugh at that. Instantly back to the Silly Season.
I know it's fun for some and that's cool too.
I just prefer to see who they drafted and go from there.
Razer
April 22, 2026 at 07:34 am
Totally agree. This is the first year that I didn't invest a minute in draft research. Maybe it is the perennial late picks or Gutekunst's approach to team design but I never end up on the same page. It's just a frustration. No doubt we'll be back here next week talking about the projects and mysteries that are new to the team. It would be nice to get enough guys to a second contract to call this draft a winner.
Since'75
April 22, 2026 at 02:13 pm
Good point Razer, 'generally' speaking, that's the sign of a solid, to above average player.
If the team signs that player to a 2nd contract.
Cheezehead72
April 22, 2026 at 08:02 am
I somewhat agree with your thinking. I liked Wolf and I believe any GM that will trade a 1st rounder for a third string QB that had a drinking problem and then he turns out to be one of the best and one of the most entertaining QBs has some serious balls and is not worried about keeping his job. And yes he had other great drafts.
I liked TT. The one thing I did not like about TT was his over conservative use of FA. He needed to be more active. I like a draft and develop plan but holes need to be filled with proven players. I look at TT's draft of Rodgers as a no brainer. Rodgers had fallen into the Packers lap and he had to take him. He was a top 5 pick that dropped. Yes I give him credit for drafting him with Favre still playing very good and being able to keep him on the bench for 3 years.
I do not have the same feeling for Gute. As I have mentioned before it seems as Gute is grasping at straws and does not have a plan that he sticks to.
Razer
April 22, 2026 at 09:03 am
...I do not have the same feeling for Gute. As I have mentioned before it seems as Gute is grasping at straws and does not have a plan that he sticks to...
Ted Thompson's record speaks for itself and I think he had a better staff. Gutekunst made a statement with Love then failed to carry through. His hedging on starting Love wasted the cheap rookie contract years and his failure to trade Rodgers to Denver for a boatload of new talent/picks wasted that opportunity. His plans are half followed and we see that playing out on our offensive and defensive lines and at corner. Stay young and get better or stay in the middle somewhere
Since'75
April 22, 2026 at 02:36 pm
Guter's plans seem....fluid. Changing on which way the wind is blowing..
Whereas, Wolf and TT seemed to have had an unmistakable focused vision.
I think the respect they earned was well deserved.
Results matter.
dobber
April 22, 2026 at 03:57 pm
"Whereas, Wolf and TT seemed to have had an unmistakable focused vision."
To be fair, they were working under different CBAs with different FA and rookie contract rules.
Coldworld
April 22, 2026 at 04:04 pm
It was also their vision. The coach was their subordinate and so were his staff. That’s not the case here now. It’s a committee of somewhere between 2 and 4 trying to make a consensus. That tends to lead to fluctuations and at times to one hand not knowing g what the other is doing.
Bitternotsour
April 22, 2026 at 04:25 pm
AKA the Murphy principle
Since'75
April 23, 2026 at 06:15 pm
Ohhh, you agree with me bitter?.....lol
NICE!!
Since'75
April 23, 2026 at 06:13 pm
Fk'n A Tweety CW!!
Since'75
April 23, 2026 at 06:04 pm
"To be fair, they were working under different CBAs with different FA and rookie contract rules." - Dobs
So were 31 other GM's.
To be fair.....they built their own Championship rosters from the ground up.
against 31 other GM's who were playing by the same CBA, and the same FA rules.
They won NFL Championships....show respect.
joejetson
April 22, 2026 at 09:05 pm
Totally agree with your comments about not trading Rodgers when they should have. However, I have doubts about whose decision that was.
It seemed like Murphy may have exercised his "final decision making authority" in that case. His "We're not idiots" comment at that time certainly makes me wonder if he nixed any possible Rodgers trade.
I doubt we'll ever know the full story about what trades were offered, and who made the final decisions.
Since'75
April 23, 2026 at 06:30 pm
Joe....
That's why i'd be first in line (at any price) to by a book about the inner workings under TT and Murphy at 1265.
I give no f whose decision it was Joe, Murphy putting himself in charge of football operations, with no previous experience, was damn stupid imo.
Murphy had no experience as GM, or scouting, which most GM's specialize in.
Did Murphy and Policy learn nothing from Harlan and Wolf?
Results do matter.
That's why i'd be first in line (at any price) to by a book about the inner workings under TT and Murphy at 1265.
I thought trading Favre after 2005, was a no brainer, and Rodgers, when he requested a trade.
As i said....both times, Kings ransom....for both of them.
The bonus prize....it would have skipped all the drama of both....lol
**********
After contemplating the thumbs down.
I am now enlightened.
I think i was wrong.
Ever since Murphy took over, everything has fallen into place.
Correcting the dysfunction of the previous GM's authority of running the team.
I mean...where did that get us?
Then Murph hired a GM who has been impeccable.
Handling the draft and the team, like no other could.
Him not winning Executive of the Year at all, is just criminal.
Since Murp took over, this team has been run like a fine Swiss watch. (Results matter)
Since Murph took over, he's ran the Packer team so well, Ted and Ron could only have dreamt of doing.
My apologies.
Thanks for opening my eyes, thumbs down.
Your articulate response was indisputable and made me look foolish.
Keep up the fine work!!
Since'75
April 22, 2026 at 03:11 pm
Yea Cheeze...
Wolf didn't just build a roster, and win a Championship.
Oh no....he came into Green Bay, and basically told the good old boys club in Green Bay, that this shit wasn't going to fly anymore
No one seemed accountable, until Wolf got there.
Before Wolf got there, as long as they were swimming in cash, winning didn't seem to matter.
That is undisputable IMO.
Wolf turned that franchise on it's head and said, no more f.....g around, i'm here to rebuild this franchise from the ground up...and win.
Changing the total culture of that team from A - Z.
When all is said and done, Ron Wolf is a hero, a legend in Green Bay, imo.
As far as i'm concerned, Ron Wolf should have a statue outside Lambeau Field.
Without Wolf's stamp on this team, it's very possible that the Packers of the last 35 years, were just yet, another mediocre NFL team.
The work and dedication of what Wolf did and accomplished in Green Bay has lasted to present day.
Make no mistake....Ron Wolf's work at 1265 Lombardi Ave, is a DIRECT reflection on who the Packers are today.
Ron Wolf...November 27 1991...
The re-birth of winning, Green Bay Packer football
PeteK
April 22, 2026 at 09:14 am
Even the greats had 1st round busts: Wolf had Reynolds & Carrol, Thompson had Harrell & Sherrod. All of Gute's 1st rounders, while not pro bowlers, are still in the league with the exception of pro bowler Alexander who has retired. We are fortunate to have very good GMs that's why the Pack wins games.
JerseyAl
April 22, 2026 at 02:19 pm
Well look at you drinking the GM cool-aid! lol.
LambeauPlain
April 22, 2026 at 05:32 pm
Facts are stubborn things. Narratives are clouds subject to the wind.
HarryHodag
April 22, 2026 at 06:45 am
Good draft, Al. I could live with this. One thing to consider is the 'need vs. value' pick at 52. Lets say Washington, the running back, is still there somehow. Do you pass on Jacobs' potential replacement for need? Good question.
golfpacker61
April 22, 2026 at 07:28 am
Washington=too many warts:
Basically a 1-year wonder-one 1000 yd season-barely
RB needs to be a pass catcher-he isn't
can't block at all-no effort
for being big-where is the physicality?
He is fast-everyone is
Better options-Nic Singleton & Adam Randall-and can be had later
HarryHodag
April 22, 2026 at 08:28 am
I read more posts showing scouts like him a lot. It also doesn't have to be a running back.
My point is focusing on 'we NEED to draft a corner or a DT" might be a foolish move long term if a stud is available at any position in round 2. Seattle drafted JSN even though at the time they didn't NEED a receiver.
Coldworld
April 22, 2026 at 08:41 am
He can’t protect, some think he actually mails it in. Not a guy I see us taking or using if we do, regardless of his running skills, while LaFleur is head coach.
golfpacker61
April 22, 2026 at 12:35 pm
We have NEEDED CB for the last 3 years and DT for 2years running. Other than a RB2 that room has good strength. GB needs a TE2 more than they need a RB2.
Starrbrite
April 22, 2026 at 06:49 am
I like it Al.
I have very little expertise concerning draft prospects, with the exception of the recognized names in the national spotlight.
I rely on you and others to keep me informed.
My personal preference is to first draft an Edge/DT followed by a CB.
These are a few names I continue to hear as potentially connected to the Packers; ColdWorld; GolfPacker; Stockholder, et al have eluded to some of these:
Lee Hunter
Ted Hurst
Chris Johnson (as you posted)
Gabe Jacas
Mason Thomas
Dominique Orange
Dani Denni-Sutton
J. Michael Sturdivant
Go Packers!!!
And thank you Al for your draft guide.
Cheezehead72
April 22, 2026 at 08:07 am
I really hope Gute does not draft an edge at 52. We spent two first round picks and a DT and gave a big contract to one player last year. We need to fix other positions. The only way I will not be totally upset is if there is that edge player that drops and we cannot pass him up. Similar to drafting Rodgers situation.
golfpacker61
April 22, 2026 at 12:40 pm
Well Cheeze, we may have bought a gamechanging Edge, but we also lost the #2 & #3 Edge rushers this year so I would say the need is high. What if our season starting Edge guys underwhelm? Do we just fly with them the rest of the year?
If we can get a starter at Edge & CB with our first 2 picks, we should be ecstatic. That would be a great start to the draft.
Starrbrite
April 22, 2026 at 10:08 pm
Cheez—I’ve always believed a strong pass rush and stopping the run are the most critical of any defensive success.
When Micah went down, we virtually had zero pass rush.
My hope is we sign Calias Campbell and draft an Edge followed by a CB.
If Johnson (cb) is there at 52 —I think we take him.
We’ll see—right?
JerseyAl
April 22, 2026 at 08:11 am
Thank you for buying the guide!
stockholder
April 22, 2026 at 10:47 am
You hear the names because Gute
brought them in.
For me; he's not setting the bar high enough.
He's planning on where they'll go,
instead of going after the Gems.
NickPerry
April 22, 2026 at 06:54 am
What has become more and more evident to me this draft season is I have become very, very, concerned with what Gute might do. Gute has had a LOT of stinker draft picks and IMO #1 draft pick or not, he needs to do amazing things with the picks he does have and NAIL these picks.
Packers fans have been to patient with Gutey thus far, at least IMO. I've been a huge Gutey supporter since he took over in 2018. I've made excuse after excuse for his picks and other moves as GM. I can't do it anymore. I look at this team and ALL the holes it has and wonder why more people aren't starting to feel this way about Gute. Just look at the O-Line. Under Ted we ALWAYS had a stud waiting to step in. Under Gute we can't even get the starting 5 right.
I'm cautiously optimistic about this years draft. It IS time Gute.
Coldworld
April 22, 2026 at 10:24 am
It will be interesting to look back after this year. If Morgan thrives at T and we find a role for Golden then things will look rather different. If neither have good years and there’s no stellar breakout from LVN, then it will indeed look a lot less edifying and more as you paint it.
Starrbrite
April 22, 2026 at 10:10 pm
“Edifying”—good word.
NickPerry
April 23, 2026 at 06:06 am
Oh shit, you mean were counting on the coaching staff to figure it out? Lets hope this new WR coach is actually good at his job unlike Butkus and Steno. Steno was a decent O-Line coach, at least better than Butkus, but I have NO IDEA what he brings as an OC.
I think the biggest way to help Golden breakout, is to actually have him on the field and THROW him the damn ball. Had they done that last year, I think we would have seen a few more TD's like he scored against Chicago.
LambeauPlain
April 22, 2026 at 05:36 pm
Meanwhile, the talent the coaches have been given has been excellent coaching them up...especially on OL. LOL.
dobber
April 22, 2026 at 07:08 am
SO MOTE IT BE!!!
Personally, I think that if this draft were what we were looking at on Sunday morning when the dust clears, Gute will have done tremendous work. I might quibble over wanting another OL--perhaps someone who is an experienced IOL or someone who can play C--but Miller would be a great pick at that point, they need to start the churn at CB. Cameron is someone who I really like as helping to fill out the WR room for '27.
I personally love Heldman as a late-round speculative pick--he reminds me a lot of George Karlaftis (remember when the Packers passed on him...twice?).
stockholder
April 22, 2026 at 07:20 am
If you think the Georgia pipeline,
Is going to solve next years free Agents.
It’s just a plain mistake and strategy.
Their biggest problem has been Consistency
I don’t see any of your guys that will instantly
Rip and Replace.
And we're headed for a rebuild next year anyways.
The hoarding of picks is the crystal ball.
Taking cbs won’t shift the problems.
And the later the pick the worst the odds.
Gute must take game changers now.
And if he doesn’t were headed for cap hell.
Coldworld
April 22, 2026 at 09:05 am
Game changers in rounds 2+ are rare gems. I will be happy if he just improves us. We already have one genuine game changer from this draft (partially) in Parsons. Now we need to be pragmatic. What we need is to get better enough that game changers like Parsons can change things enough to matter.
JerseyAl
April 22, 2026 at 09:07 am
Stock, you've outdone yourself. 6-7 separate purely negative thoughts in one post. Chicken Little is alive and well!
stockholder
April 22, 2026 at 10:34 am
Ever year I’ve seen Gute must hit on the draft.
Rather than blindly assuming a positive outcome.
Why should Gute just get one, when he could get 'em all.
If so many want a CB that bad. Then trade up.
But the majority doesn't have faith what he got.
Gute does his best work in free Agency.
And the chances of success are greater with experience.
BPA over need. Don't leave the gem for someone else.
jannesbjornson
April 22, 2026 at 04:27 pm
In that case, Move Up in Rd Two, or at least try to secure two selections in the second round.
stockholder
April 22, 2026 at 07:25 pm
I'm surprised he never brought in Logan Jones C
Since'75
April 22, 2026 at 03:23 pm
Game changers just don't grow on tree's.
When Gute wants a game changer, he trades two 1's and Kenny Clark, and gets one.
Trading for a game changer is much easier, than drafting one.
LambeauPlain
April 22, 2026 at 05:39 pm
Yes, amliag mostlyie don't do headings but who's not on first makes it rebuilding a building.
Can you write sentences that make sense?
golfpacker61
April 22, 2026 at 07:24 am
Al and others, what exactly is the scoop on Christian Millers medicals. If I remember right he has had shoulder and knee injuries/surgeries. Is he worth the risk. This DT class seems to have a lot of medical concerns.
Personally, I would take Jacas or Dennis-Sutton @ #52 if they are there. With all the question marks we have at Edge, either of those would be the best of the rest after Parsons, and give us a great option for the future.
JerseyAl
April 22, 2026 at 08:33 am
Miller had a torn labrum injury in Nov of 2024, missed two games, managed to play against Notre Dame in the College Playoff, then had surgery after the season. Returned to Georgia for the 2025 season and started 14 games with no reported injuries.
Since'75
April 22, 2026 at 03:26 pm
I can't remember who it was, but the Packers drafted someone with previous torn labrum injuries, and sure enough, it continued with the Packers.
Can't think of his name to save my life.....lol
jannesbjornson
April 22, 2026 at 04:21 pm
Doesn't Brinson have the same profile and body type ?
GregC
April 22, 2026 at 07:26 am
Actually Jonathan Ford was a 7th round draft pick, not a UFDA.
This is a good-looking mock, although I will have to read more about the 4th round WR. I'm not sure about that one.
Coldworld
April 22, 2026 at 08:47 am
Cameron is a similar player type to Doubs, but bigger and slower. He’s a lot more physical. Once the ball is in his hands, he may not be fast, but he runs like a RB. At 220 pounds he could be one (if a tall one at 6’2). He is hard to get down. He has really good hands.
There’s certainly sense in acquiring depth at the one role in this WR room that seems thin. I see the thought process here, even if he’s not one I draft (I think they like Shepherd a lot and I like the value at other positions in rounds 4 to 5). It would not upset me if we did pick him though, for that reason.
I may not be a fan of LaFleur or his O design, but Cameron is a piece that I think suits his mindset. I think he could make very good use of Cameron in his O.
bjkdad44
April 22, 2026 at 07:32 am
“my annual futile attempt to predict what Brian Gutenkunst is going to do”… this is why I pay little attention to pre draft mocks… I wonder what the statistics actually are when it comes to predicting draft choices… imagine very low!… waste of my time I think!!
JerseyAl
April 22, 2026 at 08:36 am
It's for fun. And maybe you wasted more of your time by commenting instead of just ignoring.
golfpacker61
April 22, 2026 at 11:36 am
Thank you Al, you beat me to it. That dude is always complaining.
gsd3
April 22, 2026 at 11:46 am
Fun. Exactly. It's not a "smarter than the next guy" thing.
If someone doesn't like a mock, counter with your own. Why criticize when we are all just fans having fun.
Personally, if he is there at 52, I would take Jacob Rodriguez in a heartbeat. He could play big nickel or straight up ILB on passing downs with Cooper. If the goal is to add hard core, instinctive players.
Most would disagree.
Boneman
April 22, 2026 at 07:50 am
I think this is plausible for sure. I don't like DT at 52 though and doubt Gute will waste that pick on a position that won't see the field. DT's need acclimation and time to develop at the NFL level unless they're total 1st round studs. Stackhouse and Ford should improve this year and I'll bet Gute believes that. My prediction for our first pick, in order of likelihood is OL, RB or TE. These are the positions that could contribute this year and where we could still find good value at 52.
JerseyAl
April 22, 2026 at 08:50 am
Kenny Clark played a third of the snaps as a rookie. I don't see why Miller couldn't - and if he's playing as a nose tackle, he wouldn't see many more snaps than that anyway.
dobber
April 22, 2026 at 09:02 am
Ford is 5 years in: I think he is who he is.
Coldworld
April 22, 2026 at 09:16 am
Ford is good when he gets low. He’s never been able to do that consistently. You are probably right therefore. He will flash and then get beaten more often.
LambeauPlain
April 22, 2026 at 05:44 pm
The Packers do not have their starting NT on the roster yet. Ford and Stackhouse do not show promise.
golfpacker61
April 22, 2026 at 07:50 am
Thanks for the mock Al, it sounds like you are incredibly busy.
Above I expressed concerns of Millers medicals, because of that I would shy away from him. I know it is a huge need, but not anymore than Edge. And Jacas or Dennis-Sutton would be #2 Edge on the Packers right now. WE have no proven talent at all other than Parsons.
Everette has been a favorite for me all year long, usually as a 2nd CB in my mocks when I was taking a CB with our first pick. I think he could start right away over Valentine, no matter what stockholder says.
Sorry, I am out on Cameron, he has great stats but is really slow for a WR, 4.6s. I think Stribling is available at #120 and I take him all day long there. If not, I either trade back or take WR later. I like Jeff Caldwell and Sturdivant much more than Cameron and they can be had later. #120 might be a great spot to move back for picks.
Diego Pounds-great choice. I include him in all my mocks for the reasons you stated. He 100% fits what the Packers are doing on the OL.
I am sorry, but I can't see using/wasting a late pick on a RB. Your guy Taylor is probably an OK back, but he is a backup at best and we can use this pick on something else. It will be too easy to grab a cheap, solid FA after the draft, and would be at least as good as Taylor.
Wow, Bentley would be a steal here. Does he fall this far because of age? In a heartbeat grab him.
Heidman is a great pick, some people on here don't like him, Van Den Berg, or Jaden Duggen as late Packers picks. Honestly, I would love all 3 if we could manage some more late picks. All 3 could make our team this year and have off the charts potential.
Thank you for not wasting a pick on a QB who wouldn't have a chance to make the team.
JerseyAl
April 22, 2026 at 08:47 am
see my reply to you above regarding Miller's medicals.
TheKanataThrilla
April 22, 2026 at 08:15 am
I really like the J'Mari Taylor pick and try to find him every time I do a mock. He looks to be a good goal line/short yardage RB and can fill in for Brooks as the blocking back. He may not be a #1 RB, but for a late rounder to be your 2nd or 3rd RB takes care of a need. My question is if we draft a RB, do we move on from Marshawn Lloyd even though he may have no worth via trade?
Cheezehead72
April 22, 2026 at 08:20 am
I would say that if Llyod survives training camp and is healthy they might try to release Taylor and bring him back on the PS. The other plan would be to release Brooks and bring him back to the PS. Yes they would have to pay Brooks 1.2 mil if they release him but I look at it as being better than carrying 4 RBs on the final roster.
golfpacker61
April 22, 2026 at 08:33 am
No way GB would release Brooks, obviously Gutey likes him since he was retained over Wilson, a very questionable move. Also what is the point of drafting a RB that can't make the team. We can find 5 FAs that wil be better than Taylor for the same money basically.
It's Lloyd's last chance in GB this year, he will be traded/released if he can't stay healthy. I hope he does as he would be a real wildcard although he won't ever be RB1.
Save the pick, grab another OL or 1 of Van Den Berg or Duggan-LB.
Cheezehead72
April 22, 2026 at 08:16 am
I like reading mock drafts and I did enjoy learning Al's perspective but we all need to remember no one knows what is going to happen on Thursday through Saturday and we do not know what Gute will do because Gute does not even know what he will do.
Since'75
April 22, 2026 at 03:36 pm
That's the thing, pre draft talk means nothing other than someone's wish list, and /or (entertainment).
Which is fine for those that like to devote that kind of time.
But come Saturday night, the whole dynamic of these conversations will change....
To the players they actually picked.
Coldworld
April 22, 2026 at 08:21 am
I’d be very happy with your draft. Pretty much everyone but the RB fit with my perception of approximate value and also are players I have drafted. I would be thrilled with Bentley. Finally a TE who can block to support Kraft. I’m not sure I’d take any receiver that high, but if we do, I agree Cameron is a great fit physically post Doubs and the best one to grab early.
They won’t play backs that can’t protect, and I’m not a fan of any that can in this draft as runners. Coleman not testing gives me enough concern that I’d not take him as early as he’s likely to go, otherwise he might have been the exception.
Taylor is a sufficiently moderate athlete at best. I’m not sure he would out perform Brooks or be a better 3rd choice than Martinez as a between the tackles back (even more so if Martinez had improved his protection). I’d skip the position if Taylor is our best option.
JerseyAl
April 22, 2026 at 09:09 am
I know Taylor is kind of an outlier, but I just have a gut feel about him that he could be a better Chris Brooks.
Coldworld
April 22, 2026 at 09:28 am
Sadly, as a running back, that’s a pretty low bar. It’s nice depth. I think you could say the same of Byron Cardwell Jr. out of San Diego State. He’s an excellent protector with straight line speed (4.5 40). He will be a UDFA almost certainly.
LaFleur loves Brooks and it seems Gute is willing or constrained to pander to him. Absent injury that means any such RB is headed to the PS initially at best. If that’s the case I would hope for more upside as a runner.
It’s a minor quibble given the overall draft is one of be very happy with.
golfpacker61
April 22, 2026 at 09:02 am
"Taylor is a sufficiently moderate athlete at best. I’m not sure he would out perform Brooks or be a better 3rd choice than Martinez as a between the tackles back (even more so if Martinez had improved his protection). I’d skip the position if Taylor is our best option."
100% Coldworld, it would be an unnecessary expenditure of a draft pick to select a RB that isn't better than what we already have in Strong & Martinez. If they aren't the plan then just sign a FA, there will be plenty available in the next month.
Use the pick on OL or something other than a throwaway RB. We have a ton of mid-round picks in the already ballyhooed 2027 draft. We get Jacobs replacement there.
10thArmored
April 22, 2026 at 03:35 pm
"Use the pick on OL or something other than a throwaway RB".
Absolutely
Since'61
April 22, 2026 at 09:07 am
AL I think this would be a very good draft for the Packers if Gute can pull it off and/or if he wants to. As we all know anything can happen during the draft.
all we can do now is wait and see what happens. The CHTV draft guide will help me follow up on the players that the Packers actually select and then I can attempt to evaluate how well gute has done. Thanks, Since '61
Since'75
April 22, 2026 at 03:44 pm
The first thing i do after the player is drafted, is look up and read scouting reports.
I've found over the decades, that the majority of these opinions, ring true.
Not always, but most of the time.
Some fans will also look at PFF grades.
But i have seen grades drop like a lead balloon from college, to the NFL.
Coldworld
April 22, 2026 at 04:08 pm
Naturally. The NFL is made up of the top 1-2% of players and they are more experienced, more physically developed.
Since'75
April 23, 2026 at 06:00 pm
From what i read on occasion during the Silly Season CW, fans lose sight of that fact.
Swisch
April 22, 2026 at 09:18 am
After moving unexpectedly in 2019 to a suburb north of Atlanta, I'm still not able to get excited about Georgia Bulldogs football, even though they've won a couple of national championships (while the Wisconsin Badgers have become hard to watch in their futility).
However, the "G" in Georgia does look a lot like the "G" in Green Bay, and there does seem to be a pipeline of football players going from the former to the latter. That's kind of fun.
Here's hoping all of these transplants from the Deep South to the Frozen Tundra bring a bulldog mentality to the Packers.
dobber
April 22, 2026 at 11:18 am
When I moved to Macon, GA, in 2000 after having lived my whole life in the upper midwest, I was not prepared for the in-your-face SEC mentality regarding athletics. The red-black-white G is just plain wrong.
Swisch
April 22, 2026 at 03:15 pm
Thumbs up, dobber, although I'm okay with the red-black-white version of "G." I just don't pay attention to it very much.
Coldworld
April 22, 2026 at 04:14 pm
"You know, you're pretty good ol' son
But you just flop down in that chair right there
I'm gon' show you how this stuff's done"
J-Rome
April 22, 2026 at 09:37 am
i don't know if I'm worried about what Gute will do or more worried about the other GMs. Last year I wanted a big DT and had a list of them. I watched in horror as they all came off the board earlier than projected ( some well earlier) . Who knows if Gute actually would have taken one of them, but he never had the option. Some luck the draft actually falls our way is needed because we can't control what other teams do. If we got Al's draft I'd be pretty happy.
Coldworld
April 22, 2026 at 10:16 am
Stackhouse had an 83.1 run grade from PFF in 2024 (his college average was 81+). Miller had a run grade of 82.3 in 2025. Obviously Miller stayed in on passing downs much more.
An interesting tidbit considering they played together, but one that emphasizes that nothing is guaranteed as a rookie and that what we need at this point is the disruptive threat. Miller had a 70 plus pass rush grade.
J-Rome
April 22, 2026 at 10:35 am
Rookie DTs especially don't tend to contribute as much right out of the gate. They kind of went away from Stackhouse later in the year I thought. I'm hoping he makes a jump, but it would also be nice to have a more complete player with that size.
Coldworld
April 22, 2026 at 11:24 am
I definitely want a more complete player. I agree with you that there is a growth period for NTs as well, particularly as cloggers, which is what Stackhouse is. Actually Stackhouse played better late.
I posted that in part to emphasize that Stackhouse isn’t a JAG but needs time, and that Miller is a different proposition and was in college on the same team. Miller is a run and pass capable NT, and I love the pick if we can get him. Brinson came in for Stackhouse outside of likely run downs (he is not an NT). Miller stayed in as NT to Brinson’s 3T.
jannesbjornson
April 22, 2026 at 04:33 pm
He had the option of taking Tyleik Williams as a DT, but chose to go with Golden.
Coldworld
April 22, 2026 at 09:40 am
On a different note, did Andy Herman and CHTV part ways? No pod cast since the 15th. Only one I actually viewed here with any regularity.
JerseyAl
April 22, 2026 at 09:53 am
No, we're having an issue on the backend of the site that is hampering his ability to post. Issue has been reported to our web people.
Coldworld
April 22, 2026 at 10:13 am
Good news. Thanks for that.
Dragon5
April 22, 2026 at 09:51 am
IF the Chiefs draft EDGE in top 2 rounds, I'd like to see Felix Aniduke-Uzomah acquired for our 6th and have him live under uncomfortably under Parson's armpit.
golfpacker61
April 22, 2026 at 11:44 am
Uzomah was a player mocked to GB often in his draft. He has done even less than LVN has for us. Injured a lot I think.
Dragon5
April 22, 2026 at 12:47 pm
and FAU's tape had shown more proof in his collegiate career than LVN's college & NFL tape combined. Low risk, high reward (buy low) opportunity.
splitpea1
April 22, 2026 at 10:20 am
You deserve a promotion to Packers GM with this draft...I love it! I would be so excited if we could land Miller (a lot of teams are interested)--the anchor that could be the disruptive force inside that we've needed instead of the usual "space eater". Prysock would be an excellent second option at CB for the reasons mentioned. I like the idea of Cameron a lot--we've got plenty of speed, but a possession receiver who doesn't drop the ball and can block would be a great fit for our offense (and an ideal replacement for Heath and Wicks). The only thing different I would like to see is a solid center prospect somewhere in the late rounds; not an immediate need, but certainly for the future.
I sure hope at least Gute recognizes the priorities the way this draft does.
RacineTom
April 22, 2026 at 10:49 am
I like a lot of this mock draft. Much better than the ones spit out by national media folks with no pulse on Gutey and the Packers. Here is the mock I seem to keep coming up with:
DL Christian Miller
CB Igbinosun
CB Everette
OB Jerimiah Wright
OT World
WR Malik Benson
WR Eli Heidenreich
LB Eric Gentry
Coldworld
April 22, 2026 at 12:42 pm
Taking what is given when a suitable DT or CB was not and no sane trade offer:
52. Malachi Lawrence EDGE UCF
84. Domonique Orange DT Iowa State
120. Charlie Demmings CB Stephen F. Austin
153. Ephesians Prysock CB Washington
160. JC Davis OT Illinois (as a G)
201. Carver Willis OT Washington
236. Riley Nowakowski TE Indiana
255. Michael Heldman EDGE Central Michigan
Alberta_Packer
April 22, 2026 at 06:12 pm
I noticed that no draft capital was spent on QBs and RBs - which made for a better investment allocation.
LeotisHarris
April 22, 2026 at 10:51 am
Looks good to me, Al. All real world metrics aside, if we consider what's in a name, how can we go wrong drafting an OL named Diego Pounds, and a WR named Ephesians? I'm no Biblical scholar, but the message in the Book of Ephesians personified couldn't hurt. GPG
Bitternotsour
April 22, 2026 at 11:37 am
FFS, am I going to have to read the bible again? Will there be a quiz?
LeotisHarris
April 22, 2026 at 02:54 pm
No quiz, but I expect you to read John's Letter to the Crustaceans by the end of the week.
Remember, per Christopher Moore, "blessed are the dumbf*cks, for they shall receive an 'atta boy' and maybe a nice fruit basket."
dobber
April 22, 2026 at 07:21 pm
"Blessed are the shrimp-eaters"
stockholder
April 22, 2026 at 07:30 pm
"Bubba Gump Shrimp Corporation,
golfpacker61
April 22, 2026 at 11:50 am
How about this with trades because Jacas was gone.
#69 Dani Dennis-Sutton-EDGE — Penn State
#84 Daylen Everette-CB- Georgia
#112 Sam Roush-TE- Stanford
#120 Logan Taylor-IOL-Boston College
#129 Jeff Caldwell-WR- Cincinnati
#153 Chris McClellan-DT — Missouri
#160 Diego Pounds-OT — Ole Miss
#201 Thaddeus Dixon-CB — North Carolina
#236 J. Michael Sturdivant-WR — Florida
#238 Michael Heldman-EDGE — Central Michigan
#255 Jaden Dugger-LB — Louisiana
Alberta_Packer
April 22, 2026 at 06:03 pm
I realize that Gutekunst likes to have double-digit draft picks. Except I can't see the Board favoring a leap from 7 to 11 - unless he's unpacking some of his 2027 picks.
greengold
April 22, 2026 at 11:58 am
It’s a great mock, Al.
Miller would fill a need, and he does have versatility and measureables to make a difference all 3 downs.
Everette is solid. Love the pick! The dude abides as a shut down corner.
Cameron… I really like Cameron a ton for his toughness overall. Not a breakaway threat, but an insanely sure handed chain mover who catches everything. His blocking is definitely key. He’ll be a solid add to our WR room! STs? Yessir.
Prysock? You… mind reader, you! He’s ALWAYS available, and really is phenomenally fluid in his movements/transitions at 6-3 200. Speed. Ball skills. This dude can cover. STs? Yessir.
Diego Pounds. OT is a smart choice here, especially with his gifts. Solid player.
J’Mari Taylor gives me Aaron Jones vibes. Agree with your takes and those of others.
Dallen Bentley. TE, a true Y… essential addition, and this kid fits the bill.
Michael Heldman could really surprise from R7. Proper energy infusion and skill set to complement the rest of the ED room.
Well done.
Ya_tittle
April 22, 2026 at 12:03 pm
I love your draft Al. Well done.
Alberta_Packer
April 22, 2026 at 02:41 pm
* I view Christen Miller as a bpa and fit candidate.
* Certainly Everette meets the Packers metrics. However given Gutekunst's propensity to double dip - I might go Charles Demmings in the next round.
* Josh Cameron reminds me of Allen Lazard - which has value. Although I might wait a round or two for Caleb Douglas - who may have a higher ceiling.
* I like Bentley but more likely a 5th round pick.
* Thankful that a RB other than Kaelon Black was mocked on Day 3. It's a real thin RB class - so why not J'mari Taylor? Alternatively Shomari Lawrence or Eli Heidenreich
stockholder
April 22, 2026 at 03:14 pm
If they must take a CB - Stukes has not fallen.
Tankathon just posted their mock.
Stukes and Jackson.
Alberta_Packer
April 22, 2026 at 05:50 pm
Stukes will be 25 yrs. old around the start of the season. So definitely an old prospect. While Jackson's college career has been characterized as inconsistent. Perhaps late day 3 picks for me.
Coldworld
April 22, 2026 at 08:22 pm
Stukes also profiles inside. In fact there is a fair chance he ends up as a safety
stockholder
April 23, 2026 at 07:26 am
IF Gute takes Chritian Miller.
It will be his first player refusing to test.
At the combine and Pro Day.
MooPack
April 22, 2026 at 03:55 pm
Al,
That's a good draft overall. Matches mine in some areas.
I do think it would be Packers draft malfeasance if they take a WR, RB, or TE before the 5th round, if at all. He'd have to be clearly better than any of the DT, CB, OL, or Edge needs this teams has.
However, one RB sleeper name could be taken 6th or later.
RB Eli Heidenreich Navy
2025 - 1,440 scrimmage yds. 500 rushing (77 att. for 6.9 yds per). 51 catches, 940 yds, 6 TDs (not just bubbles and checkdowns)
A dual threat being compared to Christian McCaffrey with the same exact physical build and measurements and exact same testing.
I do like TE Dallen Bentley if they can get him late.
I don't think I'd take any WR until the 7th or UDFA. I do like KR/WR Kaden Wetjen Iowa as the best KR in the nation and best to come out in a while.
Also, I think this is a weak Edge draft except for the very top. I can't see any after that 1st moving the needle from what we have in Sorrell or Cox enough to take away from the needs of DT, CB, and OL. But I Do like the Michael Heldman pick in the 7th.
My draft:
52: DL Christian Miller
84: CB Daylen Everette
120: iOL Jalen Farmer
153: OT Jude Bowry
160: CB Charles Demmings
201: DL DeMonte Capehart
236: Edge Michael Heldman
255: CB Lorenzo Styles
Based on my past draft guesses, none of these guys will be available at the picks I put them at, even though I've been able to get each of them at the pick based on consensus board.
Other guys I like in the 2nd round:
OG Keylan Rutledge
DT Domonique Orange "Big Citrus"
DT Lee Hunter
Major Snafu
April 22, 2026 at 04:13 pm
Sounds good Al. I got nuttin.
LambeauPlain
April 22, 2026 at 05:51 pm
My mock draft is Al's draft. I like it! Jersey has far more information as the draft guru than I could ever have acquired in weeks of work.
It does a fine job of matching BAPs at positions of need.
PhantomII
April 23, 2026 at 05:39 am
A real good TE at 52 will help an unremarkable OL and we saw what happened when Kraft went down....A stud DL helps the pass rush and by default CB room by less time in coverage....Whatever Gute does, this is where we must get a pick who starts day 1 to make a difference....Move up for that if need be...GPG
Coldworld
April 23, 2026 at 08:09 am
The TEs most likely to help the OL are unlikely to need to be taken at 52. They are probably all day 3. That aside, I agree wholeheartedly.