The Packers Need to Implement a Go-To Target
Sometimes your Quarterback needs a security blanket
By GregMeinholz

Something caught my eye while viewing some of the other playoff games in the last two weeks. Whenever defenses sent heavy pressure or a play fell apart, it seemed like the Quarterbacks all had their go-to target for a quick and easy pass. This was especially evident in the Rams vs Vikings wild card game. Whenever Minnesota sent pressure after Matthew Stafford, Stafford had a receiver waiting for an easy dump-off for a short gain. This just seemed like an ingenious plan and I have grown a little irritated with the fact that Matt LaFleur didn't have that for Jordan Love this season. Instead, it seemed like whenever pressure was dialed up by the defense, Love had to look 20 yards down-field and hope one of those receivers was open. The Packers need to dial up that concept in 2025.
This doesn't necessarily need to be what the play call is on third down, but it could be a check play or route adjustment that Jordan Love could call at the line of scrimmage when he recognizes pressure is coming from the defense. Instead of running a routine route, a receiver or tight end could jog out 3-4 yards in the QB's line of sight for that easy quick pitch and catch to get the QB out of trouble. Even a simple concept like that could be the difference between 3rd and 7 conversions and your Quarterback throwing up a prayer or taking a sack.
Now I know what you might be thinking, this seems like another article about the Packers needing a number-one receiver that the Quarterback can go to when in trouble. And it's true that in the past we've seen our Quarterback find that number one receiver when they're in duress. How many times did we watch Aaron Rodgers get flushed out of the pocket by pressure only to find Jordy Nelson for a pitch and catch for the first down? Or even Davante Adams after Jordy? Those two certainly qualified as WR1 in their respective careers. But sometimes, it just needs to be a pass-catcher that the QB trusts.
This past NFL season when you look at reception leaders, one thing sticks out among the top five. Two of the five are Tight Ends. Brock Bowers of the Las Vegas Raiders had the third most receptions in the league with 112, and fellow tight end Trey McBride of the Arizona Cardinals was right behind him in fourth with 111. Each of those teams has a receiver they could consider to be WR1 in Jakobi Meyers and Marvin Harrison Jr. But yet the tight end is the one leading the way. Sometimes a big tight end who can create yards after the catch is the best option to be a QB security blanket. What's helped make Patrick Mahomes so great over the years? A big tight end named Travis Kelce is there to bail him out at any moment.
Can the Packers get that go-to pass-catcher?

Who Can Make the Leap?
At the start of the 2024 season, I would've called Romeo Doubs Jordan Love's security blanket. In 2023, Love and Doubs seemed to have developed a chemistry where Doubs was always available whenever Love needed to get the ball out. Doubs was starting to remind me a little bit of Jordy Nelson with that 87 just suddenly appearing on the screen catching a crucial first down before ducking out of bounds. But in 2024, that didn't happen quite as much. Perhaps it was due to Jordan Love's inability to extend plays very often, or perhaps it was on the part of Doubs just not getting into the position his QB needed to make the connection. Doubs could make the comeback into that role in 2025, but the Packers may want to keep their options open.
Ranking second on the team in receptions for the season was tight end Tucker Kraft. Kraft made a huge leap in his second season and turned himself into a top-10 tight end. With 50 receptions, Kraft turned in 707 receiving yards which was good for 7th among tight ends in 2024. Perhaps the most important statistic for Tucker Kraft is that 64% of his receiving yards came after the catch. He was a YAC merchant. Kraft is good down the field but it could be very beneficial to Jordan Love and the Packers' offense to make Tucker Kraft that hot go-to target when pressure comes in. Even on a 3-yard pass, Kraft could turn it into much more, bailing out his QB.
Jayden Reed has led the team in receiving yards and receptions in each of his first two seasons in the league. Which for this past year, is a bit of a telling feat for the rest of the squad considering Reed was almost non-existent in a few match-ups. Nonetheless, he did it, and that may be one of the reasons I have him on the list of possible go-to's. Yes, that probably sounds ridiculous, but remember how Aaron Rodgers used to say that an off-year for him might be a good year for other Quarterbacks? Well, perhaps an off-year for Jayden Reed is still a decent year compared to others. Many would define Jayden Reed as a slot receiver considering his size, but in reality, he can do it all. He's what you may call a play-making receiver. Put the ball in his hands and let him roll. Which could be an argument for making him that go-to target. He has the escapability to turn nothing into something and could be perfect for the role.
Or perhaps the perfect pass catcher for the job isn't even on the roster right now. It could be a rookie willing to put in his dues doing the nitty gritty plays for their team, or even a longtime veteran who's paid their dues, had their success, and is now willing to be a role player for a chance to win the Lombardi. Regardless, the Packers could benefit from this concept. It will help make Jordan Love a little more comfortable and will also help to move the chains drive after drive.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Greg Meinholz is a lifelong devoted Packer fan. A contributor to CheeseheadTV as well as PackersTalk. Follow him on Twitter @gmeinholz and Bluesky @gmeinholz.bsky.social for Packers commentary, random humor, beer endorsements, and occasional Star Wars and Marvel ramblings.
__________________________




Comments (54)
Matt
January 26, 2025 at 06:10 am
The go-to target has already had a name - Tucker Kraft. If he had a quiet game it was only because of game script. He always did more than he could. A human tank with good hands and no fear.
Coldworld
January 26, 2025 at 09:35 am
Exactly, big target with excellent hands and drop rate and impressive YAC performance. It’s baffling he wasn’t more called upon last season.
EnemyTerritory
January 26, 2025 at 12:58 pm
I came to that same conclusion after just reading the headline .
egbertsouse
January 26, 2025 at 06:49 am
None of these current guys are going to magically become a go-to receiver. If the Packers want one they are going to have to go out and get one via trade, free agency, or the draft.
mrtundra
January 26, 2025 at 08:02 am
One WR getting mentioned, pre-draft, is Elic Ayomanor, out of Stanford. Maybe worth a look.....
Packitin
January 26, 2025 at 08:39 am
Two words:
Tucker
Kraft
TKWorldWide
January 26, 2025 at 07:13 am
I would be shocked to learn that GB doesn’t already have some kind of hot receiver route adjustment system they can call at the line.
I also don’t want any kind of return to over reliance on any particular target. Yes, a reliable, clutch guy on third down is nice. Forcing a pass to that guy while ignoring other wide open receivers is not.
Cheeseisgood
January 26, 2025 at 02:53 pm
I agree, l like the any guy can be "the guy" depending on opponent. We just need another wr that can replace Watson when he's not healthy. In turn opening up the underneath stuff for everyone else.
SicSemperTyrannis
January 27, 2025 at 02:04 am
That's Bo Melton.
Savage57
January 26, 2025 at 07:25 am
These things develop organically. It's not so much designating a guy, as it is an element of play design where the influence of the play flow on the defense creates the hot receiver opportunity.
This is part of that VR shit Love needs to wrap his head around.
Bitternotsour
January 26, 2025 at 08:57 am
to designate a goy would suggest there were other options on the team I am unaware of.
dobber
January 26, 2025 at 10:22 am
Oy, vey!
MitchAnthony
January 26, 2025 at 11:24 am
A number one mensch?
barutanseijin
January 26, 2025 at 03:06 pm
Meshugana to have a goy! Needs to be AJ Dillon i guess.
Bitternotsour
January 26, 2025 at 04:15 pm
Get me someone in Legal
stockholder
January 26, 2025 at 07:41 am
Go too? Like Hell.
Love only needs to go to the guy
that leaves his man to blitz.
He doesn't. He's got a RB for a dump.
He's got a TE. To beat the LBs. Etc.
He wants chunks of yards.
Not the west coast offense.
Love must figure it out.
No Wr 1 is going to help,
because they'll get double teamed.
Until the OL keeps the rush off his back.
Love was given what he needed.
Coldworld
January 26, 2025 at 09:38 am
Love doesn’t make the play calls or design the offense. If it were him refusing to play to the scheme he’d be reined in by his coaches. Right observation, wrong assignment of culpability.
stockholder
January 26, 2025 at 11:47 am
Decision making- So wrong ,So you-
Cheeseisgood
January 26, 2025 at 03:00 pm
Definitely plays a part. But also afraid offense is predicated on the deep guy stretching the field. Much like McCarthy when our offense wasn't as electric without seam running TE.
Vachio
January 26, 2025 at 07:46 am
This is a Jordan Love issue more than anything else. Go back and watch most of his bad INTs. There's another player open, either as a safety valve or just plain open within his line of sight, that he either doesn't see or just ignores almost every single time. The opportunities are there, he's just not taking them for whatever reason.
From the outside looking in, it seems like overconfidence to me. Confidence is a good thing, but forcing things that aren't there...not so much. On the plus side, it looks correctable. He's just got to find that balance between Captain Checkdown and Hero Ball that works best for him.
dobber
January 26, 2025 at 10:24 am
"There's another player open, either as a safety valve or just plain open within his line of sight, that he either doesn't see or just ignores"
Didn't we seem to have the same criticisms of 12 in the latter part of his GB career?
Cheeseisgood
January 26, 2025 at 03:04 pm
I would expect bone head plays, he's young, as far as games started. Also his injuries had to play into his performance this year.
Handsback
January 26, 2025 at 08:09 am
Agree with Matt....Kraft is there. Frankly, Jacob's could be the guy as well.
Not sure if it's Love looking down the field for a bigger play or MLF's coaching stressing ignoring the outlet. Either way, not doing the offense any favors.
Just MHO
NFLfan
January 26, 2025 at 09:08 am
WR is not as important as 2-3 additional, strong OL-men. Ask Stenavich to return as O-Line coach or hire a top-notch O-Line coach. This move will give Love better protection. GB has to fix their trenches first-better players and coaches. Hire a better WR coach first. Throw to Kraft/Jacobs more; both have good hands.
Hire the best QB coach and help Jordan w/his foot-work and decision-making.
Start @ the foundation and build up.
lou
January 26, 2025 at 09:24 am
Kraft needs more targets because he has earned more targets. Talk about a go to guy, remember when the Packers couldn't get over the hump with the Cowboys, even though they had Michael Irvin their go to guy who moved the chains was their tight end Novacheck time after time.
Cheeseisgood
January 26, 2025 at 03:08 pm
That and Emmitt. And that protection for Aikman. And that secondary. And that defensive line.
SinceLombardi
January 26, 2025 at 10:13 am
I disagree. Nobody said that in 2023, did they? In fact quite the opposite. Love needs to play better. Period. He has two security blankets already.. Kraft and Jacobs.
Packerpasty
January 26, 2025 at 01:14 pm
true, they can have all the "go to" guys they want but Love has to play much better...more accuracy and read the field better, go through his progressions...sometimes he doesnt have the time but there always seemed to be a safety outlet avail that he wouldn't hit..
Leatherhead
January 26, 2025 at 10:53 am
I want to make sure I read that right. The author said that veteran QBs, in reaction to heavy pressure, just threw the ball to somebody who was open. I've been reading people that say we should be looking for more pressure, whereas I think that our pressure is adequate if we just had a little better coverage.
Reading between the lines, it sounds like the Packers would like to see Reed as more of a focal point in the offense. He was only targeted 75 times in 17 games and only caught about 50. Add in a jet sweep and that's 4 touches/game for one of our better weapons. Not enough. He averaged over 13 yards/touch. Wicks had 74 targets and Doubs had 72. So I get the balance thing, but on a similar amount of touches, Reed had more yards than Wicks and Doubs combined.
On the other hand.....Reed had problems this year. Three fumbles and 9 drops is quite a few negative plays for a guy who only touched in 75 times. That has to be cleaned up or you can't throw it to him.
I expect the Packers will add to the WR room, and I expect we might throw a little more to our TEs, but I think that Reed is the preferred #1 guy and will get more targets and touches.
Cheeseisgood
January 26, 2025 at 03:15 pm
3 fumbles, 9 drops kinda says it all.
Tundraboy
January 26, 2025 at 11:52 am
How ironic, one of the things we loved most about Love last year was that he spread the ball around and now that overconfidence is perhaps bringing out some bad Rodgers traits. Simple answer is already on the roster and we need to stamp out that trait immediately. I've been giving him a pass because the line just hasn't been holding as long as he apparently needs to this year, but between maybe his mobility being affected, There's still no reason not to fully use the rbs and tight ends and adjust the play calling accordingly.
Get healthy and and on to the draft and FAs!
Dzehren
January 26, 2025 at 11:54 am
Tucker Kraft and Jayden Reed were underutilized down the stretch.
Jordan Loves multiple injuries limited his escape ability and running (only 83 total rushing yards 2024).
Packerpasty
January 26, 2025 at 01:15 pm
I doubt he's ever going to b e much of a runner...
Alberta_Packer
January 26, 2025 at 12:06 pm
A "Go-To" target addresses more the symptoms than the causes of the Offense's malaise. Love had plenty of options with Watson (when healthy), Doubs (when healthy), Kraft, Reed, Wicks, Melton, Jacobs, Heath and Musgarve (when healthy). I see the O as more of a design-build problem - which is the responsibility of the HC and OC. Simply pass plays are taking too long to develop. Also compounding this problem has been Love's vision and accuracy regression. I believe that the passing game requires a total re-think. However, I have my doubts whether the HC and OC have that level of clarity.
Dzehren
January 26, 2025 at 12:08 pm
Aron Jones was that guy. Is Marshawn Lloyd that guy? GB needs to double down in the draft & find another all purpose RB
WD
January 26, 2025 at 12:24 pm
Marshan Lloyd will be that guy. Can't wait to see him and Jacobs in the same backfield or even one in the slot. Gibbs in Detroit is often used in that role.
Since'61
January 26, 2025 at 12:53 pm
This concept of a go to receiver issue basic that it should not even need to be discussed. It's one of the reasons why I don,t believe that MLF is this great offensive genius that he is alleged to be.
IMO either Kraft or Jacobs should be the go to receiver on each play depending on the call.
This should be implemented for the 2025 season. Thanks, Since '61
bjkdad44
January 26, 2025 at 06:34 pm
Agree 100%
JohnnyLogan
January 27, 2025 at 01:39 am
La Fleur isn't an offensive genius, and Love isn't yet an accurate passer or able to read defenses as he should. When pressured, he also has trouble reading the field. Outstanding QBs can eat up a blitzing defense because someone is open, and they instinctively know where to throw the ball. I haven't seen that with Love too often.
canadapacker
January 26, 2025 at 01:06 pm
I think that there are enough go to guys. Kraft for sure as well as Jacobs. I am not sure about the actual protection timing - but I felt that too many times in too many games Love held the ball too long - there is the go to safety play ( and that does require planning - ie be in the soft spot) but there also is getting rid of the ball ie throwing it out of bounds. His pick 6 in one game standing in the endzone and not throwing it away until he was almost tackled - is a prime example of Love's bad of holding it too long. Not a fan of some of the naked bootlegs - when there is not a go to guy - but Lafleur needs to work on more plays where the pocket moves rather than just straight back - and that goes to Lafleur's tendency to forgetting to get motion involved .
Leatherhead
January 26, 2025 at 04:33 pm
Reading through these comments, it seems like a lot of people don't like what we're trying to do on offense.
1)We run a lot., more than just about anybody. Especially more than anybody without a running QB.
2) We don't pass a lot. We had one 300 yard game and that was in a loss. We only passed an average of 28 times a game, and several of our best games we were closer to 20 attempts.
3) When we do pass, we're good at it. 64% completion, which is average, but in the yards/attempt and yards/catch, we're 2nd and 3rd in the league. That means we throw downfield. If you're throwing downfield, you aren't dinking and dunking to the RB and TE.... ESPECIALLY when you're only throwing it 20 times a game, you want to make those passes count. Yes, shorter passes to the TE and RB might be an option if we can't replace Watson .
4) We need to have a more reliable offense in the playoffs. We can't go out there in elimination games and score 10 points, so IMO, the Big Problem at 1265 Lambeau is "How do we make our offense more successful "?? Not just over 17 games, but in the elimination games as well.
5) We all know that the QB has to play well. He has to be protected, and he's got to have guys around him to help him move the ball and score points. Most of those guys are on rookie deals, with the exception of Jacobs and Jenkins. They've been rookies, they've been second year guys. Now it's time to have a career year.. Love's Window is probably only another 4 years or so and I wouldn't expect the organization to burn a lot of time off that clock with a team around him that isn't good enough to win with.
6) Packers are close, IMO. But they're going to have to find a way to inject more octane in the offense.
SicSemperTyrannis
January 27, 2025 at 02:30 am
Why does JL10's window close in 2030?
Leatherhead
January 27, 2025 at 05:23 pm
Good question. If you go back and look at the age of Super Bowl winning QBs, especially since free agency and the salary cap took hold, it's pretty clear that most of the QBs who've won Super Bowls are on the good side of 30, or they're named Manning or Brady.
Assuming that Love is not going to be among the GOAT discussion, then most mortal QBs have either already won a Super Bowl by 30, or they aren't going to .
I call it the QB Trap. You have this great QB who won a Super Bowl, like Rodgers or Roethlisberger, and you hang onto him for another decade. He becomes really expensive and eats up a big chunk of salary cap and you have to economize somewhere else.
IMO, the Packers held onto Favre too long, and Rodgers. I think teams hang onto that QB who was great at 28 but not really anymore at 38. It'd probably be easier if you made a trade and changed directions after your QB reached a certain age.
So that's why I think this is the Love Window. We'll get it done in the next couple of years with Love or we won't, and if we don't, it's time to move on.
harleycops
January 26, 2025 at 05:23 pm
Did you watch that Eagles game? 3 TD by Hurts. 3 by Barkley. 100 yd by Goedert, Brown. 7 rushing TDs. 55 points in a championship game. Have we ever had those stats and production?
Guter & LaFleuzy have some bone-chilling, deep-dish evaluation of the Packers to do in the off season. We are a college team compared to the Eagles today. I guess it's better than the Lions or Viqueens, but the Eagles----yikes! I thought we were close, but it's not.
So PackerNation will sit for these post-season games AGAIN, and only wish what the Eagles have. So have at it - Gu/LaF. Get off your conservative @$$ and put a championship team together with draft, FAs, trades - to start with!!! Wish it wasn't like this, but gotta call it as we see it!!!
LeotisHarris
January 26, 2025 at 06:24 pm
In the 1961 NFL Championship game, the Packers beat the Giants 37-0. Giants had five turnovers. Packers had 345 total yards on O, 181 of that on the ground. So, yeah, teams that turn the ball over a lot typically lose by large margins.
The Packers D held that mighty Eagles juggernaut to 22 points two weeks ago. Settle down, and lighten up on the exclamation point abuse.
harleycops
January 26, 2025 at 09:10 pm
Sure Leo, 1961 football is just like 2025 football. Ya right - nice comparison. That's kinda a planet size reach, isn't it? There should've been 1/2 doz more exclamation points!
LeotisHarris
January 26, 2025 at 09:32 pm
Not sure what a "planet size reach" is, harley, but if that's meaningful in your world, hats off.
You asked if we'd ever put up numbers like the mighty Eagles did today. I provided a game where the Packers won a championship by trouncing an opponent by cashing in on turnovers and dominating the game. Kinda like what happened today, isn't it? By asking "ever" I thought you meant ever. Darn words.
Remember, harley, punctuation can kill (let's eat grandma vs let's eat, grandma). Use it wisely.
SicSemperTyrannis
January 27, 2025 at 02:36 am
For three straight weeks GB has been outclassed. Every team in every game showed us why GB was one and done. And 4 out of the past 5 weeks. GB wasn't "outclassed" by Chicago, GB shot themselves in the foot.
The differences are mostly small, except in the trenches. The margin of error is small, especially in the playoffs.
#25 played with #8 before they were pros. They share similar fire, intensity, hunger, whatever you want to call it. They need to not only feed off each other but infect the whole locker room throughout this off season ...
Bitternotsour
January 26, 2025 at 09:57 pm
Oddly harley, if the Commanders had the Packers D against the Eagles they would have won 23-22.
How's that mesh with your worldview?
Leatherhead
January 27, 2025 at 05:28 pm
55 points in an elimination game?
We've had 10, 16, 21, and 10 in our elimination games the last four years. THAT's 57. In only four games.
We lost to them 22-10. I'd hardly say we look like a college team compared to the Eagles.
It's beyond clear to me that the Packers have to figure out how to score more points, especially in elimination games. You can't expect to go out there and score 21 and win. You have to try to get 30 and hope it's enough.
canadapacker
January 26, 2025 at 05:45 pm
Every game is different - Washington just didnt play as well as they did against the Lions - cant keep turning the ball over = especially when you are moving the ball and not stoppin them. But we played better D against Phillie than Washington did. So now we need to get reset again and fix our shortcomings. But I agree that Lafleur needs to get Love more accustomed to getting the ball out and running instead of standing back into the pocket and taking sacks - and stressing the Oline.
jimtalkbox
January 27, 2025 at 11:28 am
Kraft, Doubs and Reed can all certainly fit the bill, and they're still ascending. Love has to make better decisions with the ball.
Leatherhead
January 27, 2025 at 05:34 pm
Yes! Thanks for the sanity.
We have to replace Watson's touches/targets. He had 53 targets and 33 touches. 2 TDs. That's not impossible to replace.
From the Jungle Room
January 28, 2025 at 07:28 am
Bottom line, Kraft is the next primetime TE in the league (Bowers is already a PTP).....MLF has to make next season his coming out party. I still believe in Musgrave and his versatility and speed is a legit threat....whenever it can be on the field. I have confidence in Wicks and Reed and watched (and cringed) their continued development this year, I expect them to really bring it in 2025.
Unfortunately, I don't think anyone can be confident that Watson will return early and/or be at 100% until late in the season. A terrible blow to an ultimate team player .....on the flip side of being a team player, I could see Doubs being traded....I really liked Doubs coming out of college and up until this past season, even preferred keeping him over Watson. Not anymore, I don't know what that suspension was all about but was ugly.....this team has the talent and leadership to get to the SB, you can't have "diva" distractions get in the way. With Doubs out, I could see the Packers drafting WR early and maybe even sign a FA (possibly one that is still loved by legions of Cheeseheads?!).....