Packers Fire Two Coaches

The coaching staff evaluation Mike McCarthy spoke about in his end-of-season press conference Monday evidently produced the belief that two coaches were not getting the job done. According to tweets from Green Bay Packers beat Reporters Michael Cohen and Tom SIlverstein, Running Backs coach Sam Gash and Tight Ends coach Jerry Fontenot were let go Tuesday.

 

Gash was with the Packers for two seasons and most likely was done in by the disappointing season from Eddie Lacy. McCarthy was unhappy with Lacy's off-seasson preparation and inabilty to get back to being the dynamic runner of the previous two seasons. Perhaps McCarthy felt Gash did not push Lacy hard enough.

Fontenot's firing was a bigger surprise, as he had been a member of McCarthy's staff his entire time in Green Bay. McCarthy values the tight end position as an important part of the offense, and that just wasn't the case this year. Richard Rodgers seemed to regress from last year, rookie Kennard Backman never seemed to make any progress and Justin Perillo's contributions were minor.

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

"Jersey Al" Bracco is the Editor-In-Chief, part owner and wearer of various hats for CheeseheadTV.com and PackersTalk.com. He's a lifetime Packers fan living in the land of the Giants (and Jets). Follow Al on twitter at @JerseyalGBP

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (47)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Lphill's picture

January 19, 2016 at 09:34 pm

Move Bennett to running backs, fire Capers enough already. And maybe the O line coach should go too .

0 points
0
0
guzzi2000's picture

January 19, 2016 at 09:47 pm

Band aid approach when surgery is needed.

0 points
0
0
DrealynWilliams's picture

January 20, 2016 at 01:02 pm

MM can't do shit to please some of you.

0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

January 20, 2016 at 12:17 am

Other than the need to use a profanity, Drealyn, I don't know what your comment means. Do you support one or both of the firings, have no opinion, or oppose one or both of the firings? Do you think the firings are just camouflage to distract attention - like throwing a bone to the mob?

I wrote a few weeks ago that I feel it is very difficult to evaluate position coaches. All one can do is see what kind of talent is provided (without knowing if the prospects like to party and/or eat, or in general are coachable, and the results. From that, Whitt seems excellent.

0 points
0
0
WKUPackFan's picture

January 20, 2016 at 05:29 am

Dude, I think we're on approximately the same schedule. Up and down at all hours of the night.

Just turned 56 on Saturday! Bring the young ones down for Derby this May. We will have a good time.

0 points
0
0
DrealynWilliams's picture

January 20, 2016 at 02:18 pm

@Reynoldo

I don't care about the firings.

That was meant for the people who constantly trash Coach MM. No matter what move(s) he make(s).

0 points
0
0
zoellner25's picture

January 19, 2016 at 09:56 pm

Not surprised. MMs coaching structure is a debacle. A former Olineman coaching TEs? A former QB coaching QBs and WRs? No WR-only coach? Hire Freeman or Driver to show those WRs how to play and get an RB coach who can push Lacy, both on the field and away from the buffet table.

0 points
0
0
WKUPackFan's picture

January 20, 2016 at 05:23 am

This point has been addressed many previous times, so with apologies for redundancy: Playing a position is not a prerequisite for coaching that position. Slot WRs are different from outside WRs, yet there usually aren't separate WR coaches. Centers, guards, and OTs have different responsibilities, yet there is usually only one offensive line coach and one assistant.

The abilty to teach is much more important, along with the intelligence to mesh with the overall staff and team concept.

0 points
0
0
Razer's picture

January 20, 2016 at 07:36 am

I disagree with WKUPPackFan about the coaching a position requirement. I agree that a position coach needs to be a teacher first but their knowledge of the craft needs to be part of the equation. Our defense was rebuilt and coaching is a big part of the success. Joe Whitt is teaching the young DBs how that secondary works and how to play the position. At this level, the specialization in personnel in packages points to the refinement of skills needed to execute the schemes.

If you are talking about coordinators, then yes, bigger picture teaching knowledge is more valuable. this cross-training of coaches is a grand experiment but it is not yielding results.

0 points
0
0
Evan's picture

January 20, 2016 at 09:15 am

I'm sorry, but you're just wrong. The NFL is full of position coaches who never played that position.

Bennett has been mentioned already.

You mention Joe Whitt. Great CB coach...he played WR in college.

McCarthy's first NFL gig was QB coach...he never played QB.

Andy Reid coached QBs but played OL.

Belichick played center and TE but has coached special teams, WRs, linebackers and DBs.

Mike Tomlin played WR/TE and coached DBs.

0 points
0
0
Razer's picture

January 20, 2016 at 09:53 am

Most of the guys that you cite are head coaches or coordinators, which I agree is not skill dependent. HC and coordinator requires leadership, player management and concept skills. The majority of top position coaches in the NFL are not generalists.

Of the coaches that you cited from the Packers only Joe Whitt has demonstrated results in cross discipline, probable because he is a good teacher. Once he figures out how to teach our DBs how to tackle, he'll be an excellent teacher. Bennett isn't a good OC and other than teaching the WR some running after the catch skills, his WR coaching hasn't stuck. Until you can show me results for this team, I am inclined to say that you might just be wrong.

0 points
0
0
Evan's picture

January 20, 2016 at 10:13 am

"Most of the guys that you cite are head coaches or coordinators, which I agree is not skill dependent. "

They are now...but they were position coaches first, which was my point.

"Of the coaches that you cited from the Packers only Joe Whitt has demonstrated results in cross discipline..."

And Edgar Bennett as WR coach from 2011-2014 and Mike McCarthy as QB coach from 1995-1999.

EDIT: How about Joe Philbin (coached OL and TEs) or Ben McAdoo (coached OL, TE and QB).

0 points
0
0
Razer's picture

January 20, 2016 at 10:30 am

Citing a coach's history brings little to the table unless it is balanced by the talent and long term result. McCarthy was QB coach to Rich Gannon, Elvis Grbac and Steve Bono in the years that you bring up so I am obviously wrong.

Look, I am going to say that we aren't getting the results on offense and coaching/coaching structure is a big part of the issue AND you are going to defend the generalist coaching model. Under the current philosophy, we were unable to coach-up a couple of WRs to help this offense using either Van Pelt or Edgar Bennett - two well-rounded coaches. I have no problem with a coach giving a player broader perspective on the position vis a vis their exposure to the game. You still need to do the job at hand. Did we do that this year?

0 points
0
0
Evan's picture

January 20, 2016 at 10:40 am

I don't mean to be defending any particular coaching model. All I'm doing is echoing WKU's point that playing a position is not a prerequisite for coaching that position. It strikes me as odd and counter-intuitive, sure, but it bears out across the NFL.

We definitely didn't get results on offense this past year - no doubt. But I think that's a different issue. I thought combining WR and QB coach made sense on paper -- they'll be in the same meetings, they'll be on the same page as far as audibles and seeing alignments and reacting -- but clearly both positions ended up getting short-shrift. So, splitting those up again would be priority #1.

0 points
0
0
Tundraboy's picture

January 20, 2016 at 09:19 am

Yes who thought Bennett would be a very good WR coach. Or was it that he had mature dedicated players to work with?

0 points
0
0
Evan's picture

January 20, 2016 at 09:32 am

Hard to say. He was WR coach from 2011-2014. He did have a lot of vets at that time. But that was also the exact time frame when Jordy took off.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

January 20, 2016 at 09:17 pm

How dare you (WKU and Evan) make coherent, intelligent comments!
Don't you know the Packers just lost to the Cardinals and we're busy overreacting?

0 points
0
0
Evan's picture

January 20, 2016 at 07:13 am

To piggyback on WKU, Edgar Bennett was WR coach when both Cobb and Nelson had monster years in 2014. Seems like that former RB knew what he was doing.

0 points
0
0
Tundraboy's picture

January 19, 2016 at 10:43 pm

Thanks Al for the breaking news.

0 points
0
0
pacman's picture

January 19, 2016 at 10:43 pm

I've been asking about MM since mid-season. I don't know how we fans can judge if it is him or his coaches. But the buck stops with him. If he sells management that he is ok and his coaches aren't, I can't say that it is wrong. But pretty clearly, things didn't go well with his changes last year.

I would guess that MM only has one more season to prove he knows how to get back to the SB.

0 points
0
0
DrealynWilliams's picture

January 20, 2016 at 01:12 pm

I doubt he has one season left to prove anything. Each season is different.

0 points
0
0
Patrick Helms's picture

January 19, 2016 at 10:46 pm

At least It's a step. Hopefully he gets replacements that click with the talent on this team. I agree, we also need a WR coach, I like the idea of asking Driver. Van Pelt can then focus solely on QB again. It would be great to have Bennett back as RB coach but I doubt he will step backwards.

0 points
0
0
Tundraboy's picture

January 20, 2016 at 09:22 am

Glad to see MM is not wasting anytime sending a message. Wonder if someone sent him one.

0 points
0
0
tm_inter's picture

January 19, 2016 at 11:53 pm

Why not also fire WR coach, whoever that is, because WRs couldn't get open in many games?

Also QB coach for letting AR perform way below his usual standard.

Come to think of it, the OC also has to go because the entire offense was bad for almost every game this past season.

MM should acquaint himself with the Peter Principle: The Peter Principle is the idea that in business, people are promoted into jobs with duties they cannot fulfill.

0 points
0
0
Tundraboy's picture

January 20, 2016 at 10:36 am

Isn't the QB and WR coaches the same person. I can't keep track of it anymore which kind of proves that the coaching structure is far too complicated.

0 points
0
0
Ima fubar's picture

January 21, 2016 at 04:00 pm

JImmy Johnson said it all when asked about his great Miami teams and why they were so dominant. HIs answer " You can't coach speed. You have to acquire speed guys" Speed kills.

His linebackers back then were faster than fast. Couldn't run or pass against his teams.

My take is Mike doesn't get it. This is a team that lacks speed all over the place and in key areas line outside linebacker and Tight End, Receiver. If they don't change that, all the coaching changes in the world ain't gonna help.

Unfortunately for Ted, the speed guys are all in the top 20 of the draft for the most part.

0 points
0
0
Crackerpacker's picture

January 20, 2016 at 03:21 am

IMO R Rodgers looks heavier and as a result slower than he was last year. I can only assume a coach has told him to bulk up to help with blocking. Unfortunately his blocking is not much better, But what speed he had is totally gone. I hope the new TE coach gets him back to about 250 and actually works on his blocking technique.

0 points
0
0
Ima fubar's picture

January 21, 2016 at 03:56 pm

Had to laugh. Wife is diehard packer fan. She has a packer bathroom that you could not hang one more thing on the walls. If the Packer Pro shop ever ran out of socks, they could call her.

So I sit there watching the game and mention, ya know " Rogers runs like he has a stick up his butt'. He waddles.

She doesn't think that's funny but really a runner he ain't.

0 points
0
0
WKUPackFan's picture

January 20, 2016 at 05:08 am

By all accounts MM was quite open in his presser. Speaking candidly about Lacy, the offense, and the coaching structure. He seems to be searching for optimal staff structure, hopefully that endeavor will be successful.

Perhaps MM's most interesting response was to the question regarding the WRs inability to achieve separation. He downplayed the speed factor, while emphasizing the need for a WR/TE that can work the seam. Stated that this prevents defenses from dictating coverage. Discussed the advantages of having a Jordy and harkened back to Finley. Paraphasing, MM said if you can't work the middle "you see what you saw this year".

0 points
0
0
Razer's picture

January 20, 2016 at 07:15 am

I watched the press conference and liked his candidness. I thought several of MMs comments were subtle jabs at TT for not getting the personnel to get the job done. Maybe they were more like challenges than jabs. The big man down the seam was one and the reference to move Matthews back to OLB. The message was "we need Clay to play his natural position but I got to cover for the lack of inside talent". I think the 2015 Packers spent the season covering roster gaps that other teams exploited.

0 points
0
0
jeremyjjbrown's picture

January 20, 2016 at 07:26 pm

I don't blame him for jabbing at TT. The Packers drafts from 2011-2014 were poor, and in thier model those 2-5 year guys are majority of the roster. Except for the stubburn clinging to throwing deep, I though McCarthy did an amazing job to get to the divisional round of the NFC with the team he was given.

0 points
0
0
DrealynWilliams's picture

January 20, 2016 at 01:19 pm

Of course speed isn't the problem. Lackadaisical route running and the lack of concentration was the problem.

I don't know which team had the most drops or which players had the most drops, but if I had to guess -- my guess would be the Packers being in the Top 10 and more than 2 players being in the Top 10. It's been a forgettable season for many Offensive players.

0 points
0
0
NickPerry's picture

January 20, 2016 at 06:00 am

Interesting... Never liked the Gash hire. He coached the Lions RB's 5 years, sat out 2013, then goined the Packers in 2014. Lacy is now being talked about as a 2 year flash and will be out of football soon which I'd guess if he doesn't start to take care of himself is true.

Fontenot is a scapgoat for HORRIBLE Drafting at the TE position. Rodgers should have been taken in the 7th round, 6th round at best. Backman could have been had as an UDFA, and Quarless just isn't "Gods Gift". Maybe the guy can't coach a lick but it's not like he EVER had a TE to work with.

The Packers are WAY to TOP HEAVY with Assistant HC's. MM has created a Cluster F#*# at the top of his staff. I want to see what the hell he is going to do with Clemonts, Van Pelt, and Bennett.

Rodgers seemed to miss just about every throw longer than 25 yards this year unless it was a "Hail Mary", though he won an MVP last year with Van Pelt as his QB Coach. Does Van pelt stay?

Bennett was SOOO over his head as an OC this season but can you demote him? I'd could see him keep the Asst. HC title but put him back as WR Coach.

IMO what to do with Clements is going to be the sticky one. If he's fired and Rodgers is a Pro about it no harm, no foul. If Rodgers is a wuss about it then Houston, we have a problem.

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

January 20, 2016 at 07:16 am

I really do think firing Fontenot is more of a scapegoat type of move. I would say that the problems at the TE position are more on personnel then the coaching.

That being said, maybe he was part of the problem. Not helping to develop Rodgers more, not helping to develop young players like Backman.

Gash is interesting to me. I wonder how much he had to do with what happened in the middle of the season when Lacy got benched, and Harris got let go...

0 points
0
0
Tundraboy's picture

January 20, 2016 at 10:39 am

Fontenot sure as hell had little to work with, but he also did not seem to get much out of them.

0 points
0
0
Razer's picture

January 20, 2016 at 07:46 am

Totally agree on all fronts. The TE coach is a grey one because Fontenot was working with table scraps.

Your points about the assistants on the offense is spot on. McCarthy has created a level of middle managers that are all trying to contribute but confusion may be the outcome. He now has a problem of downsizing that may create division on this team. Unfortunately, the cream (Philbin and McAdoo) has been skimmed off and we are holding onto guys that nobody wants.

I did listen to Bennett's OC press conference and was disappointed. SOOO over his head seems to fit.

0 points
0
0
CallingIt's picture

January 20, 2016 at 02:51 pm

TC and EB are going to be a big issue. EB has been 'groomed' and who's going to take the heat if you fire him. Demoting him probably isn't an option.

TC, man, you pretty much eliminated the position of OC all together by making him assistant HC. Totally messed the whole organizational structure with that one. Not sure there is a gracefully exit plan there. My guess is they stick with both guys as is. Seems like it will be more appealing to go down with the ship than admit the ideas was bad from the get go. Too bad, both coaches are good if you hadn't promoted EB out of his sphere of expertise. TC isn't a bad OC either but you lost by warping his job completely.

Best option if I'm making the call, EB becomes RB coach and TC goes to OC If they won't take the changes, fire them both and hire Philbin as OC and then go get a a RB coach.

As for a receivers coach. I'd see if Donald Driver was interested. Let AVP focus on the QBs entirely. He's got a hall of famer to get back in the groove and a talented 2nd year guy to bring along.

0 points
0
0
Tundraboy's picture

January 21, 2016 at 09:02 am

Yes. What a mess they made of the structure. It will be interesting to see how they get out of this without leaving another mess. EB at RB would be great, but don't know if he will not be insulted by it. Maybe money can smooth it over. Philbin ship has sailed so now what? We shall see.

0 points
0
0
Evan's picture

January 21, 2016 at 09:17 am

I don't see what's so complicated. Everything stays the same except they move Alex Van Pelt back to just QBs and hire a WR coach. Or maybe they move Van Pelt to just WRs and give QBs back to Clements in addition to his associate head coach title. I actually prefer the second option.

Bennett hasn't coached RBs for like 5 years...I don't see why everyone wants him to go back there. Personally, I'm looking forward to injecting some outside coaching blood into this team (RBs, TEs and maybe either QBs or WRs).

0 points
0
0
Ima fubar's picture

January 21, 2016 at 03:53 pm

Ya and defense. Even though I though they played better this year, Dom Capers can screw up a wet dream. How how how how how can a defense loose site of one of the best receivers in the game, fitzgerald. I had not too date this year, seen a receiver so wide open and I watched a hell of a lot of games this year. There was no one within 15 yards of him.
That is piss poor coaching scheme. Fire Capers.

0 points
0
0
CallingIt's picture

January 20, 2016 at 02:30 pm

How do you fire a coach because of low talent level or the player shows up in horrible condition. That long run by lacy against AZ was embarrassing.

0 points
0
0
Evan's picture

January 20, 2016 at 04:47 pm

He's in Philly coaching OL

0 points
0
0
CallingIt's picture

January 20, 2016 at 02:33 pm

Do we end the Bennett experiment and bring Philbin back?

0 points
0
0
NickPerry's picture

January 20, 2016 at 08:44 pm

Philbins been hired as have most of the good Asst. Coaches.

0 points
0
0
jeremyjjbrown's picture

January 20, 2016 at 09:41 pm

Yep, similar story to last season. All the good ones have been snatched up.

0 points
0
0
lou's picture

January 20, 2016 at 03:14 pm

My take on this is that McCarthy received pressure from Murphy (possibly Thompson as well to some degree) to act quickly in reorganizing the offensive coaches. It probably was only the 2nd time Murphy has been involved based on how well things were going, no doubt McCarthy was told by Murphy that his best friend Slocum had to go last year. Should this be the case (Murphy directly involved) this does not bode well if the team unexpectedly flounders next season, if so Mike's job will be on the line.

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

January 28, 2016 at 07:39 am

Given the under achieving performance of our offense this season changes were to be expected. I'm not sure if these are the correct moves or not but MM is following his evaluation process as he has in the past. I agree with those who have pointed out that playing a position is not a prerequisite for coaching a position. There is plenty of evidence to support that argument. Thanks, Since '61

0 points
0
0