Packers Need To Fix Leaky 2nd Half Defense
Packers 2nd half defense has been worrisome, is there a simple solution?
By Dan Saia
A concerning trend has emerged for the Green Bay Packers on defense amidst their 3-1-1 start to the 2025 season: their shaky to downright bad defensive performance in the second half of games. Despite having one of the best defenses in the NFL through the first six weeks of the season, their output in the second half of games — starting with Week 3 against the Browns — has been alarmingly poor.
Dating back to that matchup with the Browns, since the middle of the 4th quarter, they’ve allowed scoring drives on 10 of 12 second-half possessions. The breakdown goes as follows: six touchdowns, four field goals, one missed field goal, and only one punt. In total, they have allowed 80 points in the second half and overtime through their first five games.
Compare that to the first half? Only 20 points allowed — including two first halves where they held opponents scoreless. Over the past three games, the Packers have allowed 18.3 points per game after halftime, the second-most in the NFL, behind only the 1-5 Baltimore Ravens. Including the 4th quarter and overtime, Green Bay’s 13.7 points allowed per game is the worst in the league. Even with all that, their first-half dominance has kept their overall scoring defense respectable — the Packers currently rank 10th in the NFL in fewest points allowed per game with 20.4.
So what’s causing this issue, and what can they do to fix it? That’s something they’ll need to uncover — and quickly — before it starts costing them games down the stretch or in the playoffs.
For the sake of argument, let’s take out the first two games of the season against the Lions and Commanders. In both games, the Packers were operating with a sizable lead, and one could understand a less aggressive defensive approach, aimed at keeping plays in front of them. When that happens, you're bound to give up yardage in the interest of keeping the clock moving — eventually, that leads to points, which is exactly what happened.
The real focus should be on the Browns, Cowboys, and Bengals games.
In the first halves of the Browns and Bengals matchups, the Packers' defense dominated and pitched shutouts. Neither offense — ironically, both led by Joe Flacco — could get anything going. At times, they struggled to even move the ball. Late in the first half of the Bengals game, the broadcast noted that Cincinnati had just one first down — and I was surprised they even had that.
Once the second half got underway, it was a completely different story.
The Bengals took the kickoff and marched down the field to score a touchdown and get right back into the game — while bleeding nearly 10 minutes off the clock. Their next two drives resulted in a field goal and another touchdown, including a two-point conversion. Just like that, what looked like a comfortable Packers win turned into another sweaty-palmed afternoon for Packer fans and a game that disaster written all over it.
An even more concerning outcome came in their shocking loss to the Browns. The Packers held them scoreless for the first 56 minutes of that game — only to give up 13 unanswered points in the final minutes and lose. Yes, an ugly interception by Jordan Love handed the Browns a short field, but the defense then allowed Flacco to drive into field goal range for the game-winner with relative ease. One pass breakup or one sack, and that game is over.
Against the Cowboys, the defense completely self-destructed in the second half. After jumping out to a quick 13-0 lead, the defense helped squander it (aided by another turnover from the offense). From the second half through overtime, the Cowboys scored on every drive. Part of that was the play of superstar QB Dak Prescott, who was on one for most of that game. Part of it was poor performance from the defensive line after Devonte Wyatt left the game, along with subpar cornerback play. When your two most important defensive units underperform, the entire group suffers. Losing one player — even someone as important as Wyatt — shouldn’t derail everything, but it did.
So what are the Packers doing — or what can they do — to address these issues?
Matt LaFleur and Jeff Hafley are trying to figure that out — and fast.
“That’s something Haf and I were kind of nitpicking, like why is it happening?” LaFleur said this week. “Because if you look at the scoring differential — I just looked at it — I think in the first quarter throughout the course of the season, we’ve scored 24 points and the opposition scored zero. And then it’s the same — I mean, there’s a big discrepancy in the second quarter as well. But the second half? I think we’re minus-6 on the season.”
It’s not often that a team with a winning record has a negative point differential in the second half.
One suggestion LaFleur mentioned was team conditioning.
“Are we running out of gas? Obviously, they got the ball to start the second half, they go on that 18-play drive or whatever, ate up damn near 10 minutes on the clock. I don’t know, does that gas you out? Does that make you more tired? Do we need to roll more guys in the first half? That could be a possibility.”
In the Cowboys game, both offenses were scoring at will and basically played an entire 5th quarter. In a hot environment like Dallas, that can wear you out. The Browns game? That’s a harder sell. But if LaFleur and Hafley believe conditioning is the issue, maybe quicker substitutions in the first half could help keep guys fresh.
The easiest solution on paper? Force more turnovers.
Turnovers can cure a lot of defensive issues. They keep the opponent off the field, prevent points, and give your own defense a breather. Through five games, the Packers defense has only forced two takeaways (both interceptions) and are one of just three teams in the league without a forced turnover after halftime. The others? The Dolphins and Jets — who are a combined 1-11.
At this point, I think it’s safe to say the Packers are a good team — one likely headed to the playoffs, with Super Bowl potential. The defense has the ability to take over games and lead them to victory. It also has the ability to disappear and lose them games.
Whether the issue is fatigue, a lack of turnovers, or something even more complex, it needs to be fixed — and fixed quickly — so fans aren’t left with yet another disappointing playoff exit come January.
-Dan Saia




Comments (15)
TKWorldWide
October 16, 2025 at 02:48 pm
If there is something to figure out, I’m confident Jeff Hafley will do it.
splitpea1
October 16, 2025 at 03:11 pm
Three things:
1) The Packers are getting a decent amount of QB pressures and hurries, but not finishing them off with enough sacks.
2) Creating more turnovers was supposed to be a point of emphasis, but saying it and doing it on the field are two different stories. The linebackers haven't forced any fumbles (interestingly, Walker had three in his rookie season, but none since). The ball can be stripped by pulling, uppercutting, or tomahawking, so maybe more drills are in order here--in addition to carrying that mindset into the game.
3) More penetration is needed from the interior DL, so it's up to those guys to get more of it. I can see conditioning possibly being an issue as the fourth quarter winds down, but not coming out of the halftime break.
Major Snafu
October 16, 2025 at 03:16 pm
Hafwit come to GB with no or little defense experience. They handed him the Barry playbook to learn and he is winging it.
I got it Figured out and its easy. Capers, Barry and now Hafwit all had one thing in common: average players in needed skill positions. No 6'2 speedy cover guys. No speedy lateral line backers. Absolutely no top defensive ends drafted in the first round.
Thus, you got guys playing a phony zone because they cant press or cover man. No speed and size to do that.
Teams figure it out pass pass pass against the pack and you will score points and move the ball.
LeFleur gets it, you keep these clowns off the field using the run to move the ball slowly. This is thee Green Bay Packers. I say there going down, ikt wont be pretty and no playoffs.
Oppy
October 16, 2025 at 05:46 pm
We all know you're a troll, Fubared, but you keep on surprising us with how unapologetically stupid you are.
Packers0808
October 16, 2025 at 06:07 pm
Yup there is THEIR too! And so unique in your Trump like childish name calling!
TKWorldWide
October 17, 2025 at 07:24 am
Opinions are like…what, exactly? I forget…
Snap the ball
October 16, 2025 at 04:28 pm
They need to sub a bit more so your fresh at the end.
I always say
We dont need starters. We need finishers !!!!
Snap the ball
October 16, 2025 at 04:32 pm
You do what you can get away with..
Don’t want to show your stuff for division games
HarryHodag
October 16, 2025 at 04:41 pm
A win is a win.
What teams have figured out is you quickly throw the ball into open areas in the zone. You won't see any team sit back in the pocket and wait for players to open up. This is 'bend but don't break' defense. After five games the team has three and a half wins.
The real test comes when more of the division games arrive. All you need do is win enough to get into the playoffs and that is very much a possibility.
Vachio
October 16, 2025 at 07:18 pm
But they know that's the formula walking in the door. It's not like they need the first half to figure that out. Somehow, the Packers defense is shutting that down in the first half and not doing it in the 2nd. I don't know if the play calling in the 2nd half is changing or what, but it's definitely a perplexing problem.
CanPackFan
October 16, 2025 at 04:47 pm
I'm finding the GB pass defense confusing? You have a good pass rush that is pressuring the QB yet the DBs are sitting back giving up easier short passes? Very reminiscent of a Joe Barry defense. More DB pressure off the Line of Scrimmage might solve this. And Hobbs has not looked good thus far. We need another stud corner.
Coldworld
October 16, 2025 at 05:31 pm
Yes, there needs to be some adjustment in the use of ILBs/slot against teams set on dunking and dunking. They are exploiting what is otherwise a strength in that our ILBs are covering a large area, often vacating the one targeted. Perhaps that’s more Hobbs at slot in part when teams go that way over the run? This week though, we likely see a lot of their TE, so a good test of Hobbs’ ability to cover him or Bullard being perhaps better set up to bring him down consistently? I think I’d try to cover him and prevent completions first.
The other issue is more involved, that’s getting Wyatt back healthy and someone who can collapse the pocket in the middle to pair with or sub in for him. So far Brooks and Wooden aren’t getting it done well enough in terms of tackling or disruption.
21Savage
October 17, 2025 at 06:53 am
The lack of turnovers is befuddling. The defense has effectively forced 0 turnovers since the EW interception in Week 1. I can't even count the interception against Cleveland because it was an arm punt hail mary to end the half, basically an intentional giveaway by Cleveland.
On one hand, it's nice that turnovers aren't a load-bearing part of the good first half defense. It means they're just straight up playing well. On the other hand, this defense shouldn't be tied with the freaking Jets for the least amount of forced turnovers in the league. This also hampers the offense, because the offense has had ZERO short fields to work with all season. Relying on your offense to consistently rip off 80+ yard TD drives has mostly worked out so far this year, but also we saw what happens when the offense isn't uber efficient during the Cleveland game, and I don't know if "hope the offense is constantly the most efficient unit in the league for every game" is a solid long term formula.
GregC
October 17, 2025 at 07:30 am
I take issue with the statement about "subpar cornerback play." I can't think of a lot of bad plays by our CBs. In the Dallas game, they were victimized by great throws and some crazy sideline catches. In the Bengals game, it was Jamar Chase catching perfectly placed back shoulder throws. I just think Hafley needs to trust the CBs to play tighter coverage.
joejetson
October 17, 2025 at 12:07 pm
After watching Flacco tear up Pittsburgh's defense last night, I don't feel quite as much apprehension about GB's defense.
However, it would be nice to figure out the dropoff in the 2nd halves.
Sounds like LeFleur and Hafley are aware of it.