Packers Vs. Bears - 3 Plays That Make You Go Hmmm
Jersey Al picks out three thought-provoking plays from the Packers' last game.
By JerseyAl

After re-watching the Packers game, here are three plays that made me go hmmm, for various reasons. In general, I try to focus on a theme, the less obvious, or things I didn't notice watching live. These are not likely to be "highlight" plays.
I was looking at the box score after the game and the one thing that stood out to me was that Kenny Clark was not even listed - as if he didn't even play. But he did - he played a total of 48 snaps. I then checked his stats for the season and noticed that he played 37 snaps against Detroit and again, was not listed in the box score - as if he was inactive. So I had to investigate further. As in interior defensive lineman, there aren't many expectations for sacks, so I focused solely on run plays. Clark was on the field for 21 run snaps against the Bears (22 against the Lions) and recorded no measurable stats. Now, I know what you're thinking - "but Al, he's double-teamed all the time!" Well, I counted. Against the Bears, he was double-teamed seven times and six times against the Lions. So that leaves 30 run snaps between those two games when he faced a single blocker and did not so much as get a hand on a running back. In fairness, he has been on the injury list with "a toe," but he did just come off the bye and did participate fully in practice on Friday, so is that a legit excuse? I'll give you three plays and see what you think.
Double Team - First, some details on the Chicago OL on Sunday. LT Braxton Jones 6'5" 310lbs, LG Ryan Bates 6'4" 302 lbs, C Coleman Shelton 6'5" 285 lbs, RG Matt Pryor 6'7" 333lbs, RT Darnell Wright 6'6" 333lbs. Clark lined up mostly opposite of RG Matt Pryor, but when he did flip to the left side of the Chicago OL, that's where he was double-teamed the most. I'm guessing the smaller size of the OL on that side had something to do with that. Here's a typical double-team where they seal off Clark to create a lane for the running back behind the double-team. Bullard avoids the block from the WR and makes the tackle to avoid a bigger gain.
Goal Line - Here's where you want your best defensive lineman to shine, right? So I'm giving you two consecutive plays here. Both times Clark is lined up opposite the right side of the Bears' line. The first play is 1st down and goal from the five yard line. Clark gets out quickly and is met by Matt Pryor one-on-one at the six yard line. From that point Clark is pushed back a full three yard by Prior. This is Matt Pryor, a big boy for sure, but he's on his fourth team in seven years in the league. He's not Pro Bowl caliber, maybe very slightly above average, let's say. But he dominates Clark here like Kenny is a linebacker. On the second play, now 1st and goal from the three, the Bears are blocking down and Kenny tries to get into a gap, but is taken for a ride by second year starter Darnell Wright this time. This is not overly egregious, but you'd certainly like to see more resistance from Clark.
4th and 1 - This is late in the third quarter, fourth and one on your own 43 yard line. This would be one of three fourth down plays the Bears converted and while it's not likely Clark would have affected the eventual play that was run, don't you want to see more of an effort in this situation? Clark should be exploding out, staying low and trying to get in the backfield, the best and sometimes only way to prevent a 1 yard gain. Instead he kind of pops up and accepts a milquetoast stalemate against a 285 lb center. Whether it would have affected the play or not, Clark should have dominated this snap. Instead, it looks like the effort was just not there.
So what do you all think - do we blame it on "the toe" or is Clark's play this season not up to "the standard" as LaFleur likes to say?
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
"Jersey Al" Bracco is the Editor-In-Chief, part owner and wearer of various hats for CheeseheadTV.com and PackersTalk.com. He's a lifetime Packers fan living in the land of the Giants (and Jets). Follow Al on twitter at @JerseyalGBP.
__________________________




Comments (58)
ThunderFromDownunder
November 19, 2024 at 02:22 pm
I am not sure what to say here , has Kenny just gotten old or is it the injury ? I did find the article on the site very interesting . Younger players ( when drafted ) don`t have a longer career they have the same length as other older ones ( when drafted ) statistically .
Guam
November 19, 2024 at 02:53 pm
Clark was one of the guys supposed to thrive in a 4-3 alignment yet he has had a forgettable season to date. I have no idea why he hasn't been better but he is a high dollar, high snap count guy that has not been producing. He and Gary need to figure it out soon or they may be looking for new employment. With fat paychecks comes expectations to perform.
LambeauPlain
November 19, 2024 at 06:29 pm
At least Gary showed up on Sunday. I am hoping Kenny is not suffering from "I got it made now" disease. He usually shows up on game days...but not this season.
KenEllis
November 19, 2024 at 02:55 pm
Prior to 2024, Kenny Clark was mostly a very good player for the Packers.
So far in 2024, Kenny has been a ghost. No positive impact at all.
I don't know if his lack of production this season is due to the switch from the 3-4 to the 4-3, injury, or because he got old fast and is washed.
I do know that the fact that Clark has joined Rashan Gary and Jaire Alexander as veterans whose productivity declined after getting the bag should cause Gutey to ponder why that has become the norm on the defensive side of the ball in Green Bay.
Bitternotsour
November 19, 2024 at 03:36 pm
Technically speaking, McKinney is the guy who got "the bag" and it effectively negates your theory.
KenEllis
November 19, 2024 at 04:38 pm
My point is that GB giving the bag to its own players on defense has not exactly worked out of late.
Clark (3rd contract to be fair), Gary, Jaire, Cambpell, Savage (5th year option) were all internal re-signings who all failed, or at least so far have failed, to live up to the contracts given to them.
As for McKinney, he came in from outside the organization and got the bag and he has certainly shined. Great signing by Gutey.
If you are advocating for more external signings rather than loading up on the likes Stokes, Quay, Wyatt, and it looks like LVN, then I completely agree.
WestCoastPackerBacker
November 19, 2024 at 04:49 pm
You got any solutions? You got a crystal ball that tells you whether/when a player is going to get hurt? If not, there's not really a point to the point you're making. It's football. Players get hurt. Sometimes the highly paid players get hurt. Would you rather churn the squad and have an even younger roster? I like that they pay productive players; it tells the guys coming behind them that you'll get paid when it's your turn.
Sounds like you're unhappy with the drafts as well. USA Today did an analysis of draft success overall in the NFL. They looked at which positions were most commonly offered a 2nd contract, as a measure of drafting success. For edge rushers, less than half first round picks were offered 2nd deals (2000-2019 at 44%). So you can complain about Gutey's first round picks but overall it's the reality of the draft. I think the bigger issue is fan expectations. We should be expecting GMs to hit on less than half of their draft picks, but fans here regularly complain about Packer drafts. Well, only 30% of all drafted players even make an NFL roster.
Does finding starting tackles in the 4th and 7th round matter? Or a franchise QB, when teams all over try for a QB draft after draft after draft. But GB moved on pretty seamlessly from Rodgers.
LeotisHarris
November 19, 2024 at 05:48 pm
Kenny looked like a lock, and I have no explanation for his drop in performance. I don't recall any negative comments about locking him into this contract.
Curious though, ol number 48, where did "giving the bag" come from? That's a unique phrase.
barutanseijin
November 19, 2024 at 05:56 pm
I was against it. I don’t recall whether i put it in a post. My feeling was that though he was still young for someone who was up for a third contract, he had played tons of snaps over the years. He didn’t seem to be quite the force he had been earlier in his career even though last season was a decent year for him.
Bitternotsour
November 19, 2024 at 06:30 pm
I'm shocked you weren't consulted. The nerve.
barutanseijin
November 19, 2024 at 07:16 pm
Leotis was wondering whether there had been people here who were against Clark’s contract. Just responding to that. I think there were, myself included.
I certainly don’t feel aggrieved about personnel decisions as some folks seem to be. I’m too old for that, and in the end, it’s just entertainment.
LambeauPlain
November 19, 2024 at 06:32 pm
McKinney had his worst day as a Packer on Sunday...by far. What did the defense eat for breakfast Sunday AM?
WestCoastPackerBacker
November 19, 2024 at 04:13 pm
Jaire and Gary both suffered injuries the season after a big contract was signed, but that's football. They don't sign a deal and then look to get hurt and wreck their knee for back for a year. It's part of the violent nature of the game and the fact that 2nd and 3rd contract guys are older and maybe don't heal as quickly.
It's ridiculous to suggest that play declines after a contract is signed. Look at McKinney.
KenEllis
November 19, 2024 at 04:48 pm
"Jaire and Gary both suffered injuries the season after a big contract was signed,"
No they didn't
Jaire injured his shoulder and missed most of the 2021 season. He then signed his big deal in 2022.
Rashan Gary tore his ACL in 2022 and signed his big deal in 2023.
But carry on and don't let indisputable facts get in the way of your argument that the contracts given to Clark, Jaire, and Gary have turned out great for the Packers.
I look forward to a tutorial on how fans watching Clark make no tackles over the past 3 games (and with ZERO sacks through the first 10 games), Gary on his way to 5.5 sacks this season, and Jaire playing every other game due to injury are not grasping the value this trio brings to the D.
WestCoastPackerBacker
November 19, 2024 at 04:59 pm
Ken, timelines or not, players get hurt. That's my main point. I wish for the days when fans weren't all up in the air about salary cap and contract deals and signings. I truly miss that. Fans now seem to think players who get paid personally owe them something and if their expectations are not met, then the player is a bum.
Either these guys are not as good as we thought they were (which may well be true) or the coaching has failed them (probably also true). But none of these guys were ever game wreckers. Well Jaire has been a true shut down corner when healthy, but the Barry scheme pretty much limited what any of the secondary was doing.
I just think it's a weird take to complain about guys who get paid and are hurt. Jaire has been hurt on and off since he signed a big dea, Clark apparently is dealing with an injury now. We don't get to see the reality of injuries usually, sometimes until the following season, or sometimes never.
Dude, you went all opposite on me. I never said those contract "turned out great" so please don't put words in my mouth. Would I love some game-wreckers on defense? Yes, but we rarely draft high enough to get one, and they are rare enough in the draft anyway.
LambeauPlain
November 19, 2024 at 06:44 pm
Ken, I have to agree the big deals to those 3 former first rounders have returned a lousy ROI, so far.
Clark, Alexander, and Gary should have been leading the change to the new Defense. They haven't. Some flashes from Alexander when he's available. Maybe Gary is beginning to awaken. But Kenny has surprised me with his fall off. And he's only 29.
Mister Chievous
November 20, 2024 at 10:10 am
let's hope you don't have to add love to that list
LambeauPlain
November 20, 2024 at 11:57 am
You actually thought this would be an appropriate comment after Jordan Love had his best game of the season?
LOL!
splitpea1
November 19, 2024 at 03:39 pm
Actually there is an expectation for QB pressure and sacks if you've been defensive anchor like Clark has been over the years. Last season he recorded 7.5 sacks and 16 QB hits, but this year 0 sacks and only 2 hits. So something is wrong here: either the toe, difficulty with the new scheme, or maybe it's just wear and tear--he's accumulated over 6400 snaps in his career.
Everyone used to say, "Get Kenny Clark some help!", but this whole defensive line needs a ton of help. And Clark wasn't the only one not to record any stats; Van Ness was in the same club despite 25 snaps. We'll have some interesting decisions to make in the off-season to reconfigure this defense with the right personnel. Isn't it fun perpetually going around in circles trying to fix this side of the ball?
Packerpasty
November 20, 2024 at 05:23 pm
the Pack sure isn't getting anything substantial out of Clark or Van Ness...Van Ness hasn't learned any new moves since he was drafted, gets washed out easily, Clark I think hit the wall with aging out..
PeteK
November 19, 2024 at 03:41 pm
Of late, Clark needs to be a bit more stout on run plays, instead he shoots the gap and misses some tkls. When I look at very good run defenses, I see the whole line stalemating the blockers which leaves the LBs a clean lane to the ball carrier. It seems our pro bowl veterans including Jenkins are not performing to their expectations.
Oppy
November 19, 2024 at 03:56 pm
You may remember that hafley’s defensive game philosophy was touted as an attacking, penetrating defensive line that aggressively shoots the gaps and gets upfield to cause chaos behind the LOS. If you’re going to make mistakes do it 100 mph, I believe Hadley said.
Well, seeing the linemen shooting gaps instead of staying home and overshooting the run is a symptom of that. How much of this is system related? Guess we’ll find out over time. But when Clark was staying home, playing 0 tech, absorbing blocks and keeping the LBs clean in a 3-4 base (even if in nickel fronts or playing off the nose), most fans complained he wasn’t getting enough sacks.
Tough room. If it’s turf toe, that’s a problem. Hopefully he’s just in a lull and resurfaces. He C was playing impact football earlier in the season, even if he wasn’t racking up stats.
Bitternotsour
November 19, 2024 at 04:14 pm
an especially tough room for a team effort that yielded only 19 points.
Oppy
November 19, 2024 at 04:27 pm
In an even broader sense, so much more belly aching than appreciation after a win in a season where the Packers find themselves at 7-3 coming into the final stretch. It’s crazy.
I get it, I really do- the Packers could be playing a lot better and they barely survived vs. a shaky bears team. And, yes, the North is stiff competition. … but they won. And the they’re 7-3 with so much room for improvement should be ground for at least measured optimism.
Here’s to improvement and finding their groove. GPG.
Bitternotsour
November 19, 2024 at 04:34 pm
when was the 7th win last year? 2nd to the last week of December? perspective people.
WestCoastPackerBacker
November 19, 2024 at 04:52 pm
I mean, I was looking forward to fans finally celebrating a healthy Watson kicking some Chicago butt. But no, there's too many other things to complain about. When we could be celebrating his career day, or another win, or another productive day by Jacobs, or a day when Love looked much better than he has in several games.
But nope, we have to write about how Kenny Clark isn't being Kenny Clark enough.
Bitternotsour
November 19, 2024 at 06:36 pm
to be fair a lot of the complainers are trolls from division rivals. but there is truth to the "entitled town" moniker. my view is that doomed mindset is a feature of Scandinavian Protestantism.
barutanseijin
November 19, 2024 at 08:07 pm
In general i agree with you that people are complaining a lot about a win, but people who disagree aren’t necessarily trolls. The Viking contingent hasn’t even chimed in yet.
As for your hypothesis, what about all the Catholic Packer fans? And by now, there are plenty of protestant Packer fans who aren’t Scandinavian.
Bitternotsour
November 19, 2024 at 08:40 pm
i'm referring to the core "original sin" Protestantism that we imported from the homeland. You're damned regardless, accept the fire and brimstone.
It shades the mind, it makes you look for impending storms on a sunny day. Turns a 7-3 record and a team on the upswing into a harbinger of doom
barutanseijin
November 19, 2024 at 09:35 pm
Well sure, Max Weber and all that.
However, there are plenty of Catholics in the Fox Valley, Milwaukee & SE Wisconsin. That’s a good chunk of Packer fandom. How do German or Polish Catholicism fit into this theory? On top of that, you have newer arrivals to the area who don’t share in any of that. Tony Romo, whose father was from Mexico, grew up a Packer fan in Burlington. My black neighbors in Milwaukee were Packer fans like me, but came from a very different cultural and religious background.
Thinking about my own Norwegian family, they must have been descended from Vikings who particularly relished sacking Irish monasteries because they never converted to Christianity. Nevertheless, we fit all the stereotypes: dark, brooding, taciturn and grudge-bearing.
Thegreatreynoldo
November 20, 2024 at 11:29 am
It is his third game without a pressure, much less a sack. But I have been writing that Clark gets moved too often for the last 2 years, Every season since 2021 has shown regression.
NJ-RICK
November 19, 2024 at 04:01 pm
After watching the first eight games we could all see the D- Line & LB play were in trouble. Again our GM does nothing about it before the trading deadline. But Preston Smith had no trouble getting out of cheese land. He could see the problems the Packers were having and was happy to move out. And first round pick Luka VanNess what is he doing...? Not much, another great pick by a weak GM. I'll be shocked if the Packers beat the 49ers with this defense. The 49ers need this game much more then the Packers do.
Packers have to many holes on defense.... 49ers 30 Packers 21. I hope I'm wrong GPG.
Dragon5
November 19, 2024 at 04:47 pm
A pig, that enemy year (snake) is a coming for Kenny Jan 29th. Ditto for Jenkins.
Coldworld
November 19, 2024 at 04:55 pm
I don’t think Clark has been the same since he slimmed down. The change to the new system seemed like that finally might reanimate him. In fact, as you point out, he’s been largely non existent as a rusher and absent from the run game stats as well.
At some point, system adjustment becomes harder to swallow as an explanation. However, though Clark is perhaps the most surprising non beneficiary, no one has really thrived. Wyatt looked to be early, and perhaps he’s still not fully back. It could, of course, be poor fit or, as you seemed to imply, effort. Alternatively though, could it be that the way Hafley is having them play is also part of the problem? Is what he’s asking of them somehow neutering their potential?
GregC
November 19, 2024 at 05:28 pm
I like the picture: three players to go with the three plays theme. Nicely done.
These clips are concerning, except for the first one by the goal line, where Clark seemed to clog things up pretty well. He has historically gotten better toward the end of the season, but I don't think he's ever been such a non-factor earlier in the season. All we can do at this point is hope something clicks. Clark can be a difference-maker when he gets rolling.
Leatherhead
November 19, 2024 at 05:33 pm
Well, I guess we're going to add Kenny Clark to the "not good enough'' list. I really hate that we do this.
The #10 scoring defense, despite guys who are never healthy enough to play (Alexander) and guys who aren't good enough. Nixon, Walker, VanNess, Gary, and now Kenny Clark. It's a miracle that every team in the NFL doesn't run it up to 40 against us.
greengold
November 19, 2024 at 06:01 pm
The Packers have yet to play a team with a winning record.
I get what you're saying, but, FFS, Kenny Clark has taken a really bad turn into mediocrity. That dude needs to get his shit together and start bringing it.
PackoPhish
November 20, 2024 at 01:59 am
Not sure what you mean. They BEAT the Texans who are currently 7-4 and atop their division.
Thegreatreynoldo
November 20, 2024 at 11:40 am
Well, they beat
2-9 Jaguars
2-8 Titans
4-6 Bears
5-6 Indy
5-5 Rams without Cooper Kupp and Nachua
6-4 arizona
7-4 Texans without Nico Collins
31-42
LeotisHarris
November 19, 2024 at 06:12 pm
I hear ya. I loathe myself for even cheering for these guys. I mean, they were drafted by a mouth-breather from the depths of a dumpster fire, handed wads of cash by a bean counter, and they don't have the character to play well enough for PFF to rate them at the tippy-top where I need anyone I cheer for to be. Yet, this group of inadequate players is somehow a team that has won 7 games. This whole fandom thing is a heavy load to carry.
Bitternotsour
November 19, 2024 at 06:24 pm
self-hatred is underrated.
greengold
November 19, 2024 at 05:38 pm
That's what I've been getting at, Al. Kenny Clark has been doing some kind of Houdini act. Just completely disappears.
Clark's best position, the one where he turned the tables on opposing Offenses is NT. Slimming him down at DT has been a wrong turn from my perspective. Kenny Clark would benefit from beefing the F up and working in a rotation with Slaton at this point.
Thanks for digging those 3 plays up, Al. GB got rid of Preston Smith because he was mailing it in... as evidenced by a quick look at his stats. The year he signed his contract extension with GB, 2022, he had garnered an 80.8 DEF grade at PFF. Run D was 72.1. Pass Rush was 75.1 in 2021. Coverage was 78.0. His numbers today pale in comparison. 63.1 overall DEF grade. 68.8 RDEF. 56.5 PRSH. Smith had 31 and 32 STOPS in 2022 and 2023. He currently has 10. Sackk Totals were 10/9 20222-23. Today they stand at 3. 1 Qb Hit. 7 QB Hurries. There's more, but, I'm not going to dig further.
Preston Smith turned into dead weight on this Packers team, and I'm glad we traded him.
Kenny Clark? His Pass Rush numbers have dropped from 3 consecutive years in the mid-high 70s down to 57.8 this season. His Total DEF grade is 49.6, far and away the lowest of his career.
Clark had 16 QB Hits in 2023. This season he has 2. Clark had 7.5 sacks last season. This year he has 0.
Bitternotsour
November 19, 2024 at 06:26 pm
with all these guys underperforming the coaches must be miracle workers to have the team at 7-3 and the defense in the top ten in scoring. miracle workers I tell you.
LLCHESTY
November 19, 2024 at 07:53 pm
Being 10th in scoring isn't as exciting as you would think. The difference in 1st and 10th is 6.8 points a game, between 10th and 20th is 2.3. Between 10th and 17th is .9 points a game. That's a team or two missing a starting QB.
Coldworld
November 19, 2024 at 11:10 pm
I don’t understand why the record would erase questions over the pass rush. I freely admit to being puzzled at the lack of success by all of the front 7 bar, perhaps, Wyatt. I find it hard to believe it’s individual problems alone when it’s universal or near so. The change to a 4:3 alone shouldn’t have had such a general effect. They didn’t all get lazy or old. It had to be something in the way they are being asked and coached to play, surely?
Packerpasty
November 20, 2024 at 05:26 pm
so you think these guys will take the Pack deep into the playoffs against a team with a really good offense? Not me...unless they start scoring 40 a game which they cant seem to do.....reality..
Oppy
November 19, 2024 at 08:42 pm
The Packers 'got rid' of Preston Smith because he requested a trade and it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to keep a 32 year old OLB who would rather be playing in a 3-4.
NFLfan
November 19, 2024 at 06:20 pm
Part of obtaining a big salary is scrutiny and follow-up. It's called a ROI-'Return on Investment' and it should be expected.
If we are honest, all 3: Jaire, Kenny and Rashan are heading towards being very poor investments and as a business, this trend needs to be investigated, there is too much $$$ draft capital @ stake.
The Green Bay Packers are a business and have every right to act as such.
I appreciate Al looking into this situation and using film to illustrate.
LambeauPlain
November 19, 2024 at 07:04 pm
It's the second half of the season and there is plenty of tape on Hafley's new system now. Offenses will attack tendencies. Still, I expect the Defense will continue to improve.
The 7-3 record is a solid way to make the turn, and the D has helped to earn that record. Some of those early season turnovers would help!
I am surprised Hafley uncharacteristically did very little adjusting at halftime on Sunday. The Defense was on the field...a lot...like 65 plays or something crazy like that. And still held the bares to 19 pts.
stockholder
November 19, 2024 at 07:31 pm
I don't have a problem with Clark.
His sack totals are down.
But so are everyones.
The time to be concerned is
when he doesn't get double teamed.
As far as adjustments.
There's a saying that says-
Save it for later.
LLCHESTY
November 19, 2024 at 07:43 pm
Clark has been double teamed at the 3rd highest rate among DTs this year. I focused on him a few times on Sunday and he was double teamed from both sides of the line. I was more disappointed in Slaton who had a sack but was handled by a single blocker in the run game every time i watched him. It's very disappointing Clark hasn't recorded a statistic but teams are still more worried about him than any of DT on the team, also very disappointing. What seemed like a two deep strength going into the season hasn't materialized at all.
Fabio
November 20, 2024 at 04:22 am
Hi everyone
I haven't written in a long time, but I've never stopped reading Al and all the others. I have always thought that the good year for SB is 2025, but I believed that this year would still be very significant. To date (despite a positive record) the game is not good.
The worst part is that we have to be honest that the top 90% of the players (Love, Gary, Klark, Alexander and Jenkins) are absolutely not deserving of their money. I believe this requires serious reflection on the future, but above all on the work of management.
If next year (mainly in relation to the spending possibilities we will have) drastic and important choices are not made, I believe it will be a big mistake.
Last thing, I think MLF is in big confusion. The choice to go for a TD on a 4th and 6 with 13:30 left down by 5 points is just crazy!
And competent management should take it seriously.
Despite everything we all cheer together until the end (as always!)
Go Pack Go
barutanseijin
November 20, 2024 at 06:00 am
Good to hear from you!
I agree, in the end we’re all just Packer fans cheering on the team.
Fabio
November 21, 2024 at 02:29 am
Greetings to you and the whole community too
GB@Germany
November 20, 2024 at 05:42 am
Good article.
Regarding Kenny Clark I still believe it's injury related. He is one of my absolute favorit players on the team and I was happy, he got the extention.
Back to full strength, he will be a game changer on our way to New Orleans!
Go Kenny Go!
T7Steve
November 20, 2024 at 07:44 am
Al, do you or anyone have the previous year's stats to break down? If I remember right Kenny has always come on in the second half and late in the season and playoffs. I think that's where he's done his best. I could bring up that he didn't have Preston next to him for the first time, but I see in your videos what you were talking about and how it seemed he was just mailing it in.
Mister Chievous
November 20, 2024 at 09:59 am
might be time for you to get some new glasses because you can't see so good from the empire state building. on the first of your two "goal line" plays (which aren't really goal line) Clark was clearly double teamed, not "one on one" as you claim. on the second, he's shooting the gap which leaves you susceptible to being washed out from a side block. walker filled the hole so I would call this a coach's decision. I know Clark is not having a great campaign this season but I think your analysis is weak here.
JerseyAl
November 20, 2024 at 11:41 am
Maybe you should schedule an eye exam because it's clearly one-one-one. Only after Clark is driven back 3 yards does the center, who is double teaming Wyatt, make some contact with Clark. That's not a double-team. And no, I did not down-vote you.