Packers vs. Cowboys Game Predictions from CheeseheadTV.com
By JerseyAl
|
GAME PREDICTIONS Divisional Round Green Bay Packers vs. Dallas Cowboys |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Name | Record | Pick | Prediction |
| Adam | 16-0 | Green Bay Packers |
| Jersey Al | 9-8 | Green Bay Packers | 31-27 |
|
There can be no slow starts to the game for the Packers' offense this week. They will not get as many possessions as they did against the Giants, so they literally need to score practically every time they have the ball. This will be a back and forth game with the Cowboys ahead late but Rodgers leads a game winning TD drive to sens the 'boys off to the gold courses.
|
| Andrew | 11-6 | Green Bay Packers | 27-21 |
|
This is likely to be one of the better games for the weekend, and it will come down to how well the Packers contain Ezekiel Elliott. Yes, Dak Prescott is a threat as well, but if you're going to choose your poison, he's a bit shakier under pressure. If the run defense can live up to its top ten billing, the Packers should control the clock and tempo of the game. I expect Rodgers to find his way through a solid but unspectacular Dallas defense, so it's a matter of limiting Dallas on offense. I think they get the job done.
|
| Cory | 12-5 | Green Bay Packers | 27-24 |
|
The hottest quarterback in the league takes on an unproven rookie. With or without Jordy Nelson, the Packers win because Rodgers doesn't make mistakes and Prescott most assuredly will.
|
| Jason | 13-4 | Dallas Cowboys | 31-27 |
|
I had hoped this week would sway my pick but I just can't see it. The Packers, despite being without Jordy Nelson, will find success on offense and score enough to win. Defensively, I just don't see Green Bay with enough to keep both Zeke Elliott and the passing game in check. If Dez doesn't bring the dropsies, it could be a long day. Many are also talking about rookies Dak Prescott and Elliott and how they might fare in their first postseason game. I see no evidence that will be a factor on Sunday. It's another valiant effort in a playoff game in Dallas (the first since the 1995 season) but the Packers allow a late score and the magic carpet ride comes to an end.
|
| Jayme | 11-6 | Green Bay Packers | 28-21 |
|
Hard not to be nervous for this game, with the injury to Nelson and the porous nature of the banged up Packers defense. But my middle school self is really hoping to finally go into Dallas in the playoffs and get a win. And here's hoping my 28-21 prediction luck will remain.
|
| Michelle | 11-6 | Green Bay Packers | 21-20 |
|
This matchup will be as close as can be; I don’t anticipate either team striking out to an early lead. As the teams trade scores, this game could veer out of hand if one team makes a mistake. The hope is that the Packers are able to force the Cowboys into a mistake (to the tune of a turnover), and that gives Green Bay the extra boost it needs to pull ahead in the fourth quarter.
|
| Ross | 12-5 | Green Bay Packers | 41-33 |
|
I have never claimed to be an objective bystander when discussing the chances of the Green Bay Packers. Part of being a fan is the feeling of faith, the feeling of belief. I have to believe in the Green Bay Packers. Rodgers on the road in the playoffs (good), on turf (real good), against a team held together by two rookies (real, real good). I have the same feeling about this game that I did before Rodgers took on Matt Ryan in Atlanta. I don't think Green Bay wins by a wide margin, but they do win.
|
| Zach | 11-6 | Green Bay Packers | 27-20 |
|
Something just feels different this season. I haven't seen this team playing complete football in two years, but they're piecing it together at the perfect time.
|
| Mr. X | 11-6 | Green Bay Packers | 41-38 |
|
This will be a wild barn-burner of a game. Defense will go out the window but the Packers will be the last team standing.
|
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
"Jersey Al" Bracco is the Editor-In-Chief, part owner and wearer of various hats for CheeseheadTV.com and PackersTalk.com. He's a lifetime Packers fan living in the land of the Giants (and Jets). Follow Al on twitter at @JerseyalGBP.
__________________________
NFL Categories:
On today's show, join Andy Herman for his full observations from Day 1 of Packers Minicamp, plus the latest on the injuries to Zach Tom & Tucker Kraft.
Comments (52)
Ferrari Driver
January 13, 2017 at 08:56 pm
I think the people in the article are picking with their heart rather than their head by taking the Packers on the road against a team that beat them easily in the first meeting and is favored to win the game by the experts.
I predict the Packers 31 Cowboys 21
chugwater
January 13, 2017 at 09:41 pm
Nicely done.
pooch
January 13, 2017 at 11:37 pm
Lot of cheeseheads drinking green and gold koolaid,Monday reality will settle in.
chugwater
January 14, 2017 at 07:39 am
I will say this...People think the Packers playing on the road works in Dallas's favor, but there's a legitimate point to be made that playing indoors helps GB's passing game. Better conditions for a track meet.
JerseyAl
January 14, 2017 at 08:53 am
"I think the people in the article are picking with their heart rather than their head "
So? Speaking for myself, I'll make my predictions however I want. Any time you have an upset, that means the "experts" were wrong. Happens a lot.
How many experts thought Alabama could lose?
Ferrari Driver
January 14, 2017 at 10:26 am
Dear Sir,
The comment was made "tongue in cheek"
Sorry to upset you.
Bert
January 13, 2017 at 09:19 pm
Packers 34 - Dallas 30. Rodgers has the hot hand and will stay hot this week.
Rossonero
January 13, 2017 at 09:29 pm
Packers 27, Cowboys 26. Down 26-24 with 2 minutes to go, Rodgers engineers a masterful drive and Mason Crosby hits a game winning 50 yarder as time expires.
Tundraboy
January 13, 2017 at 11:30 pm
"I have haven't seen this team playing complete football in two years, but they're piecing it together at the perfect time.
So true. Playing with passion as a team, contributions from unexpected players, more weapons and Rodgers hot, somehow I truly like our chances better than at any point in recent memory. GPG
TommyG
January 14, 2017 at 01:39 am
With jordy the packers take a lead and keep it. Without ( which is our case) this one is going to get out of hand quickly. I hate that I am making this prediction, but it is what my brain and not my heart is telling me. Without AR's usual safety valve I foresee many 3&out. Now there is a chance that because there is no tape of this team without jordy that the offense may be quite successful. The defense will still struggle. Agh! This is agony! Dallas wins 31-16. I hate myself.
chugwater
January 14, 2017 at 07:43 am
Let it all out TommyG. Your honesty is appreciated. The good thing is the outcome of the game doesn't depend on our commentary.
Go Pack Go!
Chad the white Scandinavian
January 14, 2017 at 03:55 am
I keep going back and forth on this stupid game, just can't get off the fence. In one sense, the Packers may actually dismantle the Cowboys, similar to how they did against the Seahacks and the NY Giants. In another, the Cowboys can completely control the line of scrimmage and time of possession, giving them the heavy advantage, plus they're at home. This could put pressure on the offense, possibly leading to a lot of mistakes just like in their last meeting.
This is a game where Aaron and every receiver are just gonna have to play at their absolute best, and while I believe they're a strong unit, especially with Jared Cook giving them a further edge, if we do run into any trouble at all, I'm worried the lack of Jordy Nelson will be too much to overcome.
The Packers should seriously consider playing Ty Montgomery quite a lot at WR in this game, even if it gasses him out completely. They need to give him 10 snaps at RB and 30+ at wide receiver, unless of course he gains a hot hand like he did against the Bears. Christine Michael and Ripkowski need to carry the RB load as much as possible.
If they can do that successfully, they should have what they need to compete strongly enough to win, especially if Dallas dominates on offense like they're expected to. We DO have a better defense for the first time in months, but it may not matter against a run game and offensive line as good as theirs. It could be a game where we simply have to outscore them in a high stakes shoot-out.
NickPerry
January 14, 2017 at 06:15 am
I like Michael in this game for some reason. He didn't play that much last week but when he did he was effective. Montgomery caught 10 balls against the Cowboys in the last game and I think he could do something similar again. But it's Michael who will be the more effective runner Sunday.
He played really well last week when he ran the ball against the Giants. This might be the game MM goes to him earlier and more often. Just a hunch MM really liked what Michaels did last week (10 carries 47 yards).
dobber
January 14, 2017 at 08:33 am
Michael played at a whole different speed last week than we've seen for awhile. Sometimes he finds a hole...sometimes he doesn't. But if the Packers get a couple early runs out of him (or Monty) that chew up yardage it will make things much easier for the offense.
NickPerry
January 14, 2017 at 11:19 am
Exactly my thought. He ran really hard last week, almost violent and he was doing it with a hell of a lot of passion. A few times I've seem him go East and West when it looked like if he had just planted his foot and cut up and inside he'd have been gone.
Andrew Lloyd Peth
January 14, 2017 at 09:01 am
I agree, Chad. You're dead right in how to use Montgomery, and Green Bay must play a near-perfect game to compete.
In the end, Dallas's offensive line will be far too much, so my prediction is a blowout.
Dallas, 41-20.
johnnyd17
January 14, 2017 at 10:40 am
but the Packers O=line is vastly superior at pass blocking...
erikgj
January 14, 2017 at 04:26 am
Pack 34-13. Pack just play lights out and do not turn over the ball. Atlanta 2010 without the mistakes.
chugwater
January 14, 2017 at 07:45 am
'Bartender, I'll have what he's having.'
johnnyd17
January 14, 2017 at 10:40 am
Kesslers?
cheddarhead
January 14, 2017 at 10:21 am
We have won there before, let me see, oh yeah it was SUPERBOWL XLV. Don't let the negative Nellys, Debbie Downers, Johnny Rain Clouds, COWS, and Al Bundys of the world get u down to their level.
I'm from northern Wi. I'm guessing these fans r of the older variety. All I hear from them is we're going to lose, fire TT, Fire MM etc....
It seems that no matter how many trophies, MVPS, playoffs appearances, championships u get it's never good enough. (I'm thankful I'm not a Cleveland fan right now.)
We may lose tommorow or we may win, but I at least don't have the Packers losing before they even play. A true fan BELIEVES. Even when the odds r stacked against u.
I think some how this team plays it's best when their backs r against the wall. So lets chear hard for are green and gold so we can make up for all the negative Nellys that try to bring us down.
GO PACK GO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Spock
January 14, 2017 at 12:17 pm
Hey, I'm a fan of the "older variety" (62+) and unlike some here I never gave up on this team (like "since 61" and a few others) even when we were losing. MM's teams typically peak in December and I fully expected that to happen again. Don't be throwing the "older variety" fans under a blanket comment, especially if you are more of a "junior" fan. It's disrespectful ( I "Harrumph, and head back to the couch) :).
cheddarhead
January 14, 2017 at 01:43 pm
I am 57. And I didn't direct it at all fans over 60. These r fans that remember the good old days. The Lombardi era. Then lived through the 29 year drought. Sorry if I offended any one.
NickPerry
January 14, 2017 at 06:07 am
Personally I'm waiting for "dobber" to make his prediction. The Packers are 7-0 in the last 7 games since he began making his predictions! GO DOBBER GO!!!
dobber
January 14, 2017 at 08:37 am
Seven weeks ago, I finally relented and picked Philadelphia to beat the Packers, 27-13...Packers won.
Six weeks ago, I picked Houston to win 27-13...Packers won.
Five weeks ago, I picked Seattle to win 27-13...Packers won.
Four weeks ago, I picked Chicago to win 27-13...Packers won.
Three weeks ago, I picked Minnesota to win 27-13...Packers won.
Two weeks ago, I picked Detroit to win 27-13...Packers won.
Last week, I picked New York to win 27-13...Packers won.
Dallas 27-13.
Razer
January 14, 2017 at 08:51 am
Putting the team and Packer Nation ahead of your personal stats - you are a good man Dobber.
dobber
January 14, 2017 at 08:58 am
My personal stats aren't much better...although I did finish third in both of my FFLs this year, so I've got that going for me.
NickPerry
January 14, 2017 at 11:33 am
Thank you dobber! Now everything seems okay in Packerland...
chugwater
January 14, 2017 at 10:23 am
I tip my hat to you, sir.
GVPacker
January 14, 2017 at 01:39 pm
There is No Doubt Dobber you are on fire! keep up the good work!
Razer
January 14, 2017 at 08:49 am
I am looking for modest success against the run. Keep Elliott from getting too many favorable down and distances. I am looking for success in our run game. If Montgomery and Michael can force Dallas to come up for the run, I will look for Rodgers to put on his best "fish shooting" outfit.
So looking forward to the Packers playing hard and fast. Go Packers
Andrew Lloyd Peth
January 14, 2017 at 08:56 am
Rarely have I seen 2 teams meet in Round 2 with such a disparity in talent. Dallas isn't just better; they're dramatically better.
Love my Pack, but I never, ever pick with my heart.
Dallas, 41-20.
vj_ostrowski
January 14, 2017 at 09:54 am
Not disagreeing that there's the talent disparity you speak of in THIS game, but...
You know Houston plays in New England this weekend, right?! XD
Razer
January 14, 2017 at 10:39 am
Sorry, I don't see the disparity in talent. Yes, their O-line and Elliott give them an edge that we haven't been able to muster but after that we matchup well and exceed. Our offense is better than their defense and Rodgers playing well is a huge x-factor for us. And, we have been playing well on defense despite the injuries. Our takeaways and forced turnovers on defense have been off the charts lately.
We are not outgunned here and we are nobodies underdog.
dobber
January 14, 2017 at 11:00 am
It galls me because Dallas plays exactly the kind of offense I really like to watch. But if there's a team I despise more than Minnesota or Chicago, it's Dallas.
Razer
January 14, 2017 at 11:57 am
You named in order the teams that I always want to trounce. And yes, Dallas pounding the ball is something that I was hoping we would be able to do this year. I am still hoping that our gameplan brings some surprises from Montgomery and Michael. It adds a whole new dimension to an offense.
Since'61
January 14, 2017 at 09:08 am
This game is about the Packers OL v. the Dallas OL. The Dallas OL is the best in the league at run blocking and the Packers OL is the best in the league at pass blocking. So who will execute behind their OL, Rodgers or Eliott? I'm going with Rodgers because Rodgers is mobile and can throw on the run or run for a 1st down or kill a defense from the pocket. Eliott can only run and only so far. I'm taking the Packers OL over the Dallas OL for that reason, plus the Packers defense doesn't need to be perfect to win. Hold Dallas under 30 points and we'll be fine. However, Dallas needs to defend Rodgers, running and passing, our receiving even without Jordy is still very effective and also defend against Monty, Michael and Rip. Taken all together, that is a tall order for any defense as the Giants found out. No one has spoken about special teams this week but the Packers STs looked really improved versus the Giants. Look for a big play from Hyde or Janis or even Michael on Special teams. Add in a turnover or 2 from our defense. I like the Pack 37 - 24. No excuses, no let ups, no prisoners. Go Pack Go! Thanks, Since '61
dobber
January 14, 2017 at 09:26 am
The last couple weeks of the season, Dallas's defense was really pursuing aggressively and swarming to the football. They were tackling very well. I think this can be expoited...misdirection, bootlegs, etc. There are some big plays to be made there, this week.
Cwoodson21
January 14, 2017 at 11:07 am
I agree. I think that our OL will be motivated going up against an OL whuch is widely regarded as the best in the NFL. Packers 38-28.
Lphill
January 14, 2017 at 09:26 am
Packers by 7 , experience pays off plus the bitterness of recent playoff disasters , Peppars makes some plays , Daniels, no Jordy no problem . Cowboys turn it over. Don't have to stop the run just limit it , let them burn the clock and kick field goals .
johnnyd17
January 14, 2017 at 10:43 am
look for Packers to run and pass well...even if they start slow, 4 turnovers last time a big factor, max factor even, special teams, could be decided at the gun
4thand1
January 14, 2017 at 11:27 am
Rematch BS. Remember the dismal performance in Az during the reg season last year? The Packers took em to ot with a ton of injuries. They also dropped some key ints and should have won. Packers turned it over 4 times against Dallas this year and lost by 14. They play a clean game in Dallas, they win. Pack 35-24.
GOPACKGO
Rossonero
January 14, 2017 at 12:32 pm
Exactly. I think sometimes the losing team is at more of an advantage, as long as they make the adjustments and have the personnel to do so. It's hard to beat anyone twice in the NFL.
stockholder
January 14, 2017 at 12:36 pm
This game will be determined by A-Rod. Quick Passes to Adams and montgomery will be to hard to stop. Cook will have his biggest game as a Packer. Special Teams and field position will keep Dallas fans quiet. Dak will try to go over the top, only to be picked off. Burnett is the key in the middle. Our secondary will look to the veterans. This game is going to be fun. Hopefully the players can enjoy It! Packers win. 35-28. And we are AMERICA'S TEAM!
LASVEGAS-TOM
January 14, 2017 at 04:22 pm
Guy's help me out. I need OVER 52 in this Seattle game.
LVT
LASVEGAS-TOM
January 14, 2017 at 06:31 pm
THANK YOU!! THANK YOU!! SEATTLE
LVT
LASVEGAS-TOM
January 14, 2017 at 07:34 pm
It could be a Good Day. We need the Pats by 17.
LVT
LASVEGAS-TOM
January 14, 2017 at 10:31 pm
YES!! YES!! YES!! THANK YOU!! THANK YOU!!
NEW ENGLAND. COW, You want to drive the truck??
THANK YOU NEW ENGLAND!!
LVT
LASVEGAS-TOM
January 15, 2017 at 12:15 am
Well that's 8 out of 9 for me. I have GB +4 at Dallas, but to be Honest, It goes against how I think. 65% of the internet, thinks GB is going to win. That's not Good!! From what I can gather, the Handicappers are about 50/50. The Dallas people were hoping for Seattle. As I've told you many times, & was correct, GB getting 4 pt's is as a rule an automatic loss. I hope I am misreading Dallas. I really can't call this game, because I can't determine who the better team is. Go ahead & laugh if you want, but I win a lot more than I lose. I'm hoping the money is going either to the Dallas side, or on the Over/Under. 53 when I looked last night. All the Favorites have won & covered so far, all 7. Let's hope there's a Junk Yard Dog running loose. I hit 2 Big Ones today, so I can't lose. Had a Great Night at the Casino last night. I just hope I have the GB game figured right. It's been a Great Weekend. Hope it carries through the GB game
Whoever keeps giving me the dislikes, I hope I get one here. I'm laughing all the way to the bank!!
LVT
LASVEGAS-TOM
January 15, 2017 at 12:29 am
6
LVT
Stormin24
January 15, 2017 at 01:11 am
Packers 38 Cowboys 27
Coaching gives the Packers an advantage. The team is in sync and will stay in sync. This game is about the Packers
Doug_In_Sandpoint
January 15, 2017 at 08:37 am
We own Jerryworld. The pokes have never won as big of a game there as we have. It will be so again. Like Dobber, I've been riding a streak...
Pack rolls 32-12.