Will Jager Burton Become A Starter By Season’s End?

5th round rookie could be a starter sooner rather than later

For years, the Green Bay Packers have built one of the league’s most respected offensive line pipelines. Mark Tauscher, David Bakhtiari, Corey Linsley are just a few of the names to arrive as mid to late round picks and quickly become starters. It rarely matters whether a player arrives as a first-round pick, a mid-round developmental prospect, or an overlooked athlete with traits. If the Packers believe the tools are there, they trust their coaching staff and development system to eventually turn that player into a contributor.

That philosophy is exactly why fifth-round rookie from Kentucky Jager Burton is such an intriguing name to watch entering the 2026 season.

At first glance, Burton may appear destined for a traditional rookie redshirt season. He was selected on Day 3, joins a crowded interior offensive line room, and still has technical inconsistencies that need refinement. But when you dig deeper into Green Bay’s current offensive line situation, Burton’s versatility, intelligence and athletic profile, and the uncertainty surrounding multiple interior spots, a very real question emerges:

Could Burton actually become a starter by the end of the season?

The answer is more complicated than a simple yes or no. However, the path is absolutely there.

Burton enters the NFL after a long and productive career at the University of Kentucky, where he started a total of 47 games at left guard, right guard, and center. That versatility immediately matters in Green Bay because the Packers value offensive linemen who can handle multiple responsibilities. General manager Brian Gutekunst and the organization have consistently prioritized flexibility up front. Burton checks every box in that regard. 

What makes Burton especially fascinating is that he may actually project best at center despite spending time all across the interior during college. According to multiple scouting evaluations, his strongest tape came during his final season at center, where his football intelligence, communication, and movement skills stood out. 

That matters because the Packers are still trying to solidify the long-term answer in the middle of their offensive line.

Entering the offseason, Green Bay faced major questions after offensive line turnover and injuries disrupted continuity. Sean Rhyan who was re-signed this offseason on a modest three year deal, has experience at center and guard and likely pencils in as the teams starting center in 2026. Veterans Aaron Banks and Zach Tom remain key pieces elsewhere on the line and will start the season at left guard and right tackle respectively. But the interior depth chart is hardly untouchable. 

That is where Burton’s opportunity begins.

The biggest thing working in Burton’s favor is the type of athlete he is. Green Bay has long been obsessed with elite Relative Athletic Scores, particularly along the offensive line, and Burton’s 9.88 RAS made him one of the most athletic centers tested in decades. His 4.94 forty-yard dash and movement skills were elite for an interior lineman. 

Those athletic traits fit perfectly into the Packers’ offensive system. Green Bay asks its offensive linemen to operate in space, climb to the second level, execute outside-zone concepts, and handle movement-heavy protections. Burton’s mobility gives him a chance to thrive in those assignments once his technique catches up.

And that last part is important.

Burton is not a polished prospect entering the league. If he were, he would not have lasted until the fifth round. Scouts consistently pointed out issues with leverage consistency, balance, and occasional struggles against stronger defensive linemen. There are snaps where Burton fires out too aggressively, loses pad level discipline, or simply gets overwhelmed by power. 

Those flaws are real, and they may prevent him from starting early in the season.

But Green Bay does not need Burton to be ready in September. The question is whether he can become a starter by season’s end, and that timeline dramatically changes the conversation.

The Packers have one of the NFL’s better developmental environments for offensive linemen. Players are rarely rushed. Instead, coaches focus on technique refinement, cross-training positions, and slowly building confidence. Burton’s football IQ and experience starting 47 consecutive games at Kentucky suggest he has the mental makeup to handle that process. 

If injuries hit the offensive line — and they almost always do over a 17-game season — Burton could quickly become the next man up. Just last season the Packers lost two starters along the offensive line in Elgton Jenkins and Zach Tom.

That possibility feels even more realistic considering Green Bay’s recent history. The Packers consistently shuffle offensive linemen during the year. Position flexibility is not just appreciated in Green Bay; it is required. Burton’s ability to play both guard spots and center could make him the top reserve interior lineman sooner rather than later.

If Burton performs adequately in relief duty, the coaching staff may decide to keep him on the field. That is especially true if the Packers are looking for more athleticism inside or if younger linemen begin outperforming veterans late in the season.

There is also the long-term financial reality of the NFL. Green Bay has repeatedly shown a willingness to transition to younger, cheaper players if they believe the upside is there. Burton being drafted at all suggests the organization sees developmental starter potential in him. Teams do not spend draft picks on interior offensive linemen unless they envision a future role.

The biggest hurdle Burton faces is likely strength and consistency against NFL defensive tackles. SEC competition certainly helped prepare him, but NFL interior defenders are a completely different challenge. Players at the professional level can exploit leverage mistakes instantly. Burton will need to improve his anchor and hand placement to avoid getting walked backward in pass protection.

Still, there are encouraging signs.

Multiple scouting reports praised Burton’s effort level, toughness, and recovery ability after initially losing reps. Those are traits offensive line coaches love because they are difficult to teach. Technique can improve. Athleticism and competitiveness are much harder to develop.

The Packers also appear to believe Burton’s ceiling is higher than where he was drafted. Green Bay’s scouting department openly praised his toughness, flexibility, and intelligence after selecting him. In many ways, Burton feels like a classic Packers offensive line pick: athletic, versatile, experienced, and slightly raw technically.

That profile has worked before in Green Bay.

Perhaps the most realistic projection for Burton in 2026 is this: he opens the season as a backup interior lineman, gradually earns trust during practice and limited game action, and becomes a legitimate candidate for a starting role late in the year if injuries or inconsistent play create an opening.

Would it be surprising if Burton started multiple games by December? Not really. Right guard Anthony Belton is the arugbaly the weakest link on the projected starting five for Green Bay. His 49.7 PFF grade from 2025 was good for 73rd out of 81 guards in the NFL. If he doesn’t experience a second year jump and continues to struggle it wouldn’t be a shock to see Burton there. Maybe as early as the week 11 bye week.

The key will be how quickly Burton adapts to NFL strength and processing speed. If he handles the mental side early and proves he can survive physically, his athletic tools could eventually separate him from other options on the roster.

The Packers have built an organizational identity around finding offensive line gems outside the early rounds. Burton may very well become the next name on that list.

So, will Jager Burton become a starter by season’s end?

Right now, it feels unlikely that he enters Week 1 in the starting lineup. There are simply too many experienced options ahead of him. But by seasons end? Whether its due to injury or performance The possibility becomes very real.

Injuries, roster movement, player development, and positional flexibility all work in Burton’s favor. More importantly, he fits exactly what Green Bay wants in an offensive lineman. Athleticism, intelligence, toughness, and versatility give him a legitimate chance to rise faster than many fifth-round rookies typically do.

The Packers may have drafted Burton as depth.

They could finish the season with him as part of their starting five sooner than we thought.

-Dan Saia

NFL Categories: 
2 points
 

Comments (16)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
splitpea1's picture

May 21, 2026 at 10:45 am

If we see Belton replaced by Burton for non-injury reasons, that would be really bad news. I don't think it will happen. Belton has too much upside, and if he develops the way we want him to in his second season, he could turn into a beast as time goes on. As far as Burton goes, par for the course would be eventually rising to near the head of the class in the backup department and showing enough promise to displace some of more unreliable options on the bench.

+ REPLY
5 points
5
0
PackEyedOptimist's picture

May 21, 2026 at 10:49 am

I will never stop believing that Gute chose Belton with the intention of having him become the starting right tackle and moving Tom to center or Left tackle. I think they were surprised at how much Belton struggled at right tackle, and moved him to right guard in hopes it would help him adjust to that side’s movement.

+ REPLY
4 points
4
0
GregC's picture

May 21, 2026 at 01:06 pm

Agreed. Having last year's 2nd round pick replaced by this year's 5th round pick does not feel like progress to me. They would just be spinning their wheels at that point.

+ REPLY
3 points
3
0
PackEyedOptimist's picture

May 21, 2026 at 10:46 am

I think there is a decent chance we get two starters out of the Burton/Gesky/Wade trio. Each has their own strengths. Burton is probably the best “ all around,” but Gesky is even stronger and faster, and Wade has lots of experience at tackle and has simply “gotten it done,” which is a great quality for OL.

Injuries could launch them this year, but 27 or 28 is more likely.

+ REPLY
3 points
3
0
Coldworld's picture

May 21, 2026 at 03:39 pm

I always thought that Belton would end up as a G, even before we picked him. The good news is that I thought he’d be a good one. Given he was thrown in with no practice at a position that wasn’t his in college, I think he did relatively well, albeit on an upward curve, unsurprisingly.

As to Burton, it will be interesting to see how he compares at G to Williams, who dropped during to health. Williams may not have the same testing but he’s got more nasty. Let’s see how that works out before we start anointing amongst the incomers let alone those returning.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
Since'61's picture

May 21, 2026 at 11:36 am

For all the versatility and development that the Packers allegedly have in their OLs the Packers OL has not been very good over the last few seasons with 2025 possibly the worst season in several years. I realize injuries are the major factor but our backups have not shown much when they fill in for the starters. Add the fact that the Packers play musical OLs throughout the season which exacerbates the problems with the OLs effectiveness.

The Packers need to decide on their best 5 put them in their positions and let them play. I believe that the musical OLs has hurt rather than helped OL performance and has not necessarily supported the young players development. For some reason we moved Jenkins from LG, his best position, to Center last season where he was not very good and eventually injured to being off the team. WE let Walker leave via FA creating an opportunity for Morgan but also creating numerous questions over whether Morgan will be effective at LT.

It just seems like, at least in some cases, that the Packers have outsmarted themselves with all this versatility among their OLs. The depth has failed to deliver at the worst possible times especially during the playoffs the last few years. At this point the only OL I have confidence in is Tom and he is returning from an injury so who knows if he will the same he was prior to his injury.

Bottom line the OL is a major question mark for the Packers going into the 2026 season. Thanks, Since '61

+ REPLY
8 points
9
1
Cheezehead72's picture

May 21, 2026 at 12:11 pm

I agree and yes I will never understand the reasoning on moving Jenkins. He was paid to be a guard. He was a good to above average guard, why not leave him there.

A better way to phrase your best 5 is find the position that the player plays the best and then start your best 5. Yes they should have one back up position but let them stick with their best position. And when you need to sub try to sub the next guy up in that position if at all possible. I do not like moving two or three players because one went down.

+ REPLY
4 points
4
0
Coldworld's picture

May 21, 2026 at 04:37 pm

When did a back up OL come in at his primary position? Rhyan maybe, but at the time we were told that was G. Glover was a T inserted at G. Belton was I think always a G candidate, but we had not had him practice there at all. Even Kinnard was a G in the Eagles’ assessment that we used as a fill in at T.

I can’t think of one example in recent years where our primary backup inserted was obviously being inserted at his best position or, often even one he’d been prepared for. What then is the value of all the versatility in practice? We carry 8 OL on game day yet they seldom seem to fit any injury created hole well, despite versatility training.

Part of that is injuries, but a B lot seems to be positional misjudgment, poor decisions in preparation—the wrong positional mix for not just talent but risk management across the active roster group—and, perhaps, the failure to get them to be as good as they can be in the rush to get them ready to play multiple positions.

This has been going on ever since Stenavich got promoted and changed the whole look of the OL in the playoffs, probably being the key factor in our exit. It’s passed through Hansen and Newman, using Glover unprepared at LG in the playoffs despite that not being his position or him ever having meaningful snaps at it (echoing Belton) as playing Newman at RT over Tom echoes forcing Morgan to G over Belton. If anything, this practice has become more expansive.

Yet here we go again, wondering if we will get it right and if we will be developing the depth in a way that maximizes both their chances to succeed and ability to contribute effectively while complaining it hasn’t done so in the past. Sometimes what is staring everyone in the face is actually just what it looks like. Despite that, we have the same coaches presiding. It may be their last chance to get it even mostly right.

+ REPLY
4 points
4
0
GregC's picture

May 21, 2026 at 01:13 pm

I don't remember the last time there were such high expectations for an offensive lineman who was drafted in the 5th round (or later). If Burton is so good as a rookie that they cannot keep him off the field, that would be a great thing, but it seems unlikely. After all of the shuffling on the O-line the past couple years, I just want to see the current starters settle into their positions and stay there all year.

+ REPLY
3 points
3
0
Guam's picture

May 21, 2026 at 03:05 pm

"The Packers have one of the NFL's better developmental environments for offensive linemen."

Really? Is that why the O-line has been so dominant the last couple of years (sic)? The OL development program was pretty good a few years back but I am not convinced it still is. The musical chairs development program has not produced much since the Tom/Walker draft of four years ago. Maybe they can get back on track with Belton and Burton, but Monk, Glover, Jennings, etc. etc. haven't exactly set the world on fire and I don't expect that to change this season.

+ REPLY
4 points
4
0
golfpacker61's picture

May 21, 2026 at 06:03 pm

"The Packers have one of the NFL’s better developmental environments for offensive linemen."

That's the thing that caught my eye too Guam. I am not an O-line expert but there are a lot of knowledgeable posters on here that have complained about our OL coaches and player development. In fact, to the point where I would not have been surprised if Butkus was replaced this off season.

If Burton is better then he should play, period. While I like the player, it would be a surprise and the steal of the draft if a 5th round OL started his first year. Although I could easily see Burton or the UDFA guys replacing Monk and other backup this year.

+ REPLY
2 points
2
0
GreenandBold's picture

May 21, 2026 at 03:27 pm

When it is so obvious that the fans know that moving your lineman all around instead of putting the best 5 out there at their best positions and keeping them there then there’s a problem . I understand injuries but when you find a good guard or tackle leave him there and be glad you found a good one . I would love for Burton to be the best center and win the competition in TC . That would be a great draft pick .

+ REPLY
3 points
3
0
MnPackerFan's picture

May 22, 2026 at 08:28 am

I am amused by all these fans who say leave players at one position and then state they know the best position which may be different from the one they are currently playing. Jenkins had been an outstanding center for his last two years of college. He had even started for GB at center because of injury. Jenkins showed enormous versatility playing well at many positions. Certainly better than any backup. He appeared to be declining at guard and was no longer one of the best. Belton did not play great at guard or tackle. His biggest issues appear to be technical which I think affected both positions. He started his last years at tackle. Those who say we should have immediately trained him at guard, are some of the same ones who complain about playing players out of their college positions and say never change positions. Also it takes time to acclimate developers to the nfl and changing or multitraing could be detrimental. I think starting him at the position he knows was a good plan. I do not think anyone can say if he will ever be much better than average at any position. He still could end up better at tackle or just a backup at both. There are a lot of poor tackles, some which have to start.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

May 21, 2026 at 05:37 pm

"The Packers have one of the NFL’s better developmental environments for offensive linemen."

That was an interesting sentence. Then Dan went on to say he would not be shocked if a 5th round rookie beat out a 2nd round veteran.

The OLine coaching battery...and that includes LaFluer...would not be graded as one of the NFL's best OL hatcheries. Far from it...ask 4 year developmental T Rasheed Walker.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Since'75's picture

May 21, 2026 at 06:09 pm

"David Bakhtiari, Corey Linsley are just a few of the names to arrive as mid to late round picks and quickly become starters."

Now include, Sitton, Wells, Lang, Tretter.
All 4th and 5th rounds, not too bad for day 3 picks.

All Big Ted (R I P)

+ REPLY
-1 points
0
1
Dragon5's picture

May 21, 2026 at 07:37 pm

born in a HORSE year

time to gallop

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0

Log in to comment and more!

Not a member yet? Join free.

If you have already commented on Cheesehead TV in the past, we've created an account for you. Just verify your email, set a password and you're golden.