Curd is the Word: Kicking Around Rumors

Do we choose to sip the gossip?

This is a fantastic time of year in the NFL. Sure, it's a little depressing that we no longer get to turn on our TVs to see football every Sunday, Monday, and Thursday, but boy, does the rumor mill fill the void to keep football on our minds. But with those rumors, we still received some truths as teams resigned players they wished to retain, and a few franchise tags were handed out. So, let's get into it, shall we?

Mason Crosby

First, Mason Crosby's retirement deserves its front and center acknowledgement. Why is it that sometimes I can't remember what I did a few days ago, but I remember random Packers memories like they were yesterday? When Mason Crosby was drafted in the sixth round of the 2007 draft coming out of Colorado, everyone talked about how he was used to kicking in the snow and the cold weather, so he'd be perfect for Green Bay. Well, they were right. Money Mason went on to become arguably the best kicker in Packers' history. He holds the record for most points in Franchise history (1,918), as well as the record for the most consecutive games played in a Packers uniform with 258. But it wasn't without its dips in the road.

Crosby struggled throughout the 2012 season with misses, having the lowest success rate of his career, 63.6%. That offseason, the Packers brought in some kicking competition for Crosby in Giorgio Tavecchio. That season, I attended my first Family Night practice, and at the end, Coach McCarthy decided to hold a little kicking competition between Crosby and Tavecchio. Despite his struggles the previous season, I was still on Team Crosby as he'd been solid for us before, and I figured he'd return to form. But I was taken aback by how many fans were not. There were fans around me who booed Crosby and cheered Tavecchio. When Crosby missed one of his practice kicks, I was floored by a young woman nearby screaming profanities at Crosby that I dare not repeat here. But despite this tough time for him, Mason Crosby prevailed and went on to win that kicking competition and followed it up with one of the best years of his career. 

Any player who had a great career in Green Bay, I believe, deserves their chance to retire with the team, whether it's a one-day contract or whenever they decide to hang it up still on the team. I'm glad Mason Crosby got his chance as one of the best Packers of all time. Thanks for all the memories, Mason.

Brandon McManus and Isaiah McDuffie

This week, the Packers announced the resigning of kicker Brandon McManus and linebacker Isaiah McDuffie. 

We go from one kicker to another. The Packers are definitely hoping their kicker woes post-Mason Crosby have come to an end, as they've signed Brandon McManus to a three-year deal. McManus joined the team for a week 7 match against the Houston Texans and nailed his first field goal attempt for the team, a 45-yarder, which gave the Packers the victory in the final seconds of regulation. McManus went on to go 20/21 in FG attempts the remainder of the season and 30/30 in extra point attempts. Needless to say, the Packers couldn't let him go and go back to kicker purgatory, especially if they have championship aspirations. So, signing the 33-year-old kicker was a no-brainer. 

Isaiah McDuffie was also resigned to a two-year deal, bringing the linebacker back for a 5th and 6th season after he was drafted by the Packers in the sixth round of the 2021 draft. At first glance, many Packer fans may think this is no big deal. But Isaiah McDuffie is a major depth piece for the Packers' defense. In 2024, he was second in total tackles for the defense and filled in very nicely when Quay Walker and Edgerrin Cooper were unable to play. Not every move is going to be glamorous, but signing players like Isaiah McDuffie keeps your team afloat when starters go down. 

And now, the rumors.

DK Metcalf

This could perhaps be the biggest rumor Packer nation is invested in. It's been floating around for weeks, and we seem to get closer and closer to something happening. But at the same time, that something still seems to be far away. At first, it was just a rumor that Seattle was shopping DK Metcalf, but now that idea is out there in the wild and is running free. The problem is that Seattle is rumored to be looking for too much. Way too much. So far, according to reports, Seattle is looking for a first-round draft pick, a young receiver, and possibly an early day 3 pick. 

It's hard to believe they will receive that compensation when whoever trades for Metcalf will undoubtedly have to pay him a new, costly contract. Brian Gutekunst has said in the past mentioned in the past that when you trade a high pick for a veteran, you're trading a young contract for a proven player, but probably an expensive player, so not only are you giving up the pick, you're giving up salary as well. So, I don't see the Packers ever meeting Seattle's asking price.

A third or fourth-round pick for Metcalf, and that's it? That I could see, but technically, three players on rookie deals? Not a chance.

Trey Hendrickson

I was intrigued by Hendrickson earlier in the offseason. He's been a player that's flown under the radar but played at a very high level as an Edge Rusher. He would be perfect to play opposite Rashan Gary and possibly take some of the heat off of Gary to allow him some more shots at the QB, but he has age working against him.

Hendrickson is 30 years old, and while that certainly doesn't mean he won't perform, it calls into question if he does perform, for how long? Brian Gutekunst has no interest in trading high draft capital for a player who may only have 2 years left playing at a high level. So, while Hendrickson is a popular and intriguing candidate who could make an impact, I just don't see the Packers making that deal. 

Free Agency

Monday starts the legal tampering period for the NFL. A lot of deals will be struck on Monday, but how many by the Packers? They have the money to spend, but how much should they spend and on what position?

Last year at this time, I was incredibly high on Xavier McKinney becoming a Packer. I would've picked X up from the airport and taken him to Lambeau Field myself if given the chance. My wish came true and I'd say it worked out pretty well. This year, I don't have a player that I absolutely need in Green Bay. 

This year, I don't have player predictions for signings, instead, I'm just going to go with predictions of position and type of player. 

Edge Rusher - As I said under Trey Hendrickson above, the Packers need someone to play opposite of Rashan Gary and take a lot of heat off him. I could see a veteran pass rusher on a 1-2 year deal. I think the Packers are still on the Lukas Van Ness hype train, so I don't think they want to stunt his growth by paying a lot of money for a younger pass rusher. They need someone Van Ness can watch and learn from a bit while splitting reps. LVN has at least one more year before the Packers need to decide his future, so burying him behind someone on the depth chart who's pay alone will get him more reps than Rashan Gary is not the answer. A veteran on a short deal, I think, is the likely direction.

Cornerback - With the inevitable departure of Jaire Alexander and also Eric Stokes, the Packers need corners. I'd see them spending on a younger to mid-career CB and then drafting one in the first two days. 

Wide Receiver - There's no one I would spend big money on unless Ja'Marr Chase somehow hits the market. Otherwise, there's just no receiver worth a big payday. Perhaps that's why Metcalf and other receivers are in high demand as trade targets. I will say, though, that I could see the Packers signing a kind of middle-of-the-pack receiver to be a hit or miss this year. 

This should absolutely be an exciting week for NFL fans. Hopefully, we will come out of it with a very positive outlook on the season ahead. Go Pack Go. 

 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Greg Meinholz is a lifelong devoted Packer fan. A contributor to CheeseheadTV as well as PackersTalk. Follow him on Twitter @gmeinholz and Bluesky @gmeinholz.bsky.social for Packers commentary, random humor, beer endorsements, and occasional Star Wars and Marvel ramblings.

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (35)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
ThunderFromDownunder's picture

March 09, 2025 at 06:00 am

This is what makes the off season sooo interesting . So many names and possibilities .

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

March 09, 2025 at 12:41 pm

I've enjoyed it too, and I find it funny that there are scenarios in which the Packers trade away their first round pick for a player when the draft is in Green Bay. I don't recall that ever being much of a possibility in previous years. It's just a coincidence, I think. More than usual, the Packers could benefit from a really good veteran player. I doubt they will trade away the pick, but it adds to the intrigue that it could make sense for them to do it this year.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

March 09, 2025 at 08:03 am

I think we'll see the Packers looking at the middle-cut of the available CB, DE and WR. If I had to guess, they'll sign a DB who can be that 3rd CB and a WR who fits into the rotation, and they'll look for an opportunity to add through the draft. I think they'll supplement the lines through the draft.

0 points
0
0
RobinsonDavis's picture

March 09, 2025 at 11:45 am

I agree. The numbers don't add up with Packer needs to simply add in the draft. So, this makes sense to me, though I do believe we will see one big signing (Remember, Gute made the comment about being aggressive). Also, I am not ruling out another DT, despite our "depth" at the position.

Do you have a CB of choice? IMO the Packers will likely let Hadden and King compete for #4 and #5 CB.

0 points
0
0
bjkdad44's picture

March 09, 2025 at 08:21 pm

🤞🏻🙏🏻🤞🏻

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

March 09, 2025 at 08:14 am

It is just not in Packer DNA to trade draft picks for a high priced veteran. Giving up draft picks and significant cap space for one player is a high risk venture and as many have said - you better get it right. Getting it wrong can damage a team for multiple years. I think the Packers will spend for a free agent CB and otherwise stay mid-market or lower for other free agent acquisitions. No trades, no high risk ventures.

0 points
0
0
KenEllis's picture

March 09, 2025 at 10:21 am

Slight correction, since 2002 it has just not been in the Packer DNA to trade ANY ROUND 1-5 pick for ANY PLAYER at ANY TIME, whether the player was a high priced veteran or a low cost younger player.

No trades of picks for players other than the odd 6th or 7th rounder for a marginal roster filler is the Packer way.

High risk ventures such as trading 1st round picks for players may be OK for franchises like the Eagles, Chiefs, and Rams (winners of the last 4 Super Bowls) and the Packers when Ron Wolf was the GM, but since Ted Thompson took over 20 years ago and was followed up by his protege Brian Gutekunst it is just not done in Green Bay, Wisconsin

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

March 09, 2025 at 11:27 am

Fair point. Thompson and Gutekunst did/do not give up draft choices easily. Which is why I don't see the Metcalf or Hendrickson deals happening.

0 points
0
0
pantz_bURp's picture

March 09, 2025 at 08:31 am

"Do we choose to sip the gossip?"

Well Greg, I would rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.

Pantztradamos

*running to daylight (savings time)

**I GOT IT! Right before the Packers make their first round selection. They cue up Kevin Greene's words to Clay: "It is Time. It is TIME..."

Genius! Chef's kiss to myself in the mirror.

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

March 09, 2025 at 09:03 am

Hey Greg, Agree, I think you hit the nail on its head!

0 points
0
0
NickPerry's picture

March 09, 2025 at 09:10 am

Call me crazy but I wouldn't mind the Packers trading draft picks for a FA like Metcalf. This obviously depends on which picks the Seahawks want. IF they could trade the 1st and 3rd I'm not completely against it. Is it a lot? Yes, but what Metcalf could do for this offense would be well worth it IMO.

I also look at Gutes track record. He hasn't exactly killed it it rounds 1 and 3. Yes, he picked Tucker Kraft in the 3rd round. But he also selected guys like Sternburger and Amari Rodgers. Don't even get me started on who was picked after those guys. While the jury is still out on Wyatt and Walker, remember Savage? Stokes? UGH!!! The jury may be out on Van Ness but IMO I doubt he's much more than last year. I'm hoping our new D-Line coach can do something with him.

Right now, IMO the Packers have Kraft, Reed, and probably Wicks (Hoping) and a nice RB group as the weapons for Jordan Love. Not one of them really strikes fear in an opposing defense. Hopefully they all continue to grow and last year was just growing pains. But they NEED a Metcalf in this offense. They also NEED to picks a WR fairly high this season.

I'll be watching anxiously this week starting Monday morning. Gutes been here 8 years and now ne has been a bigger supporter. But the time is NOW for this team to try and make some moves to get closer to the Eagles and Lions. It STARTS Monday...

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

March 09, 2025 at 09:45 am

NP: Why not just draft Egbuka or someone similar rather than pay such a high price for Metcalf? It isn't just the draft picks, but the massive chunk of salary cap that Metcalf wants. If you sign Metcalf to his desired $30MM AAV, there will be nothing left to sign a CB or fill other needs. I wouldn't mind just the draft choices or just the cap hit, but both is prohibitive.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

March 09, 2025 at 09:57 am

And that's the simple question for me, too, Guam? $20M for a vet for one year, or a first round draft pick for 4 years about half of that.

But this means that you get the best guy you can get. The One. Not some guy in back part of round 2.

0 points
0
0
PackyCheese500's picture

March 09, 2025 at 10:49 am

I do really like Egbuka, and he seems like the type of prospect who can make a day 1 impact, so I would be thrilled if the Packers drafted him, but that being said,

1. a veteran WR is the best solution to the Packers’ WR problems (red zone, drops, beating man coverage). Rookies, no matter what, are always more uncertain than Vets, and the Packers need a consistent, proven commodity at the position.
2. Metcalf’s cap hit this year, if we traded for him before June 1, would only be about 11m. We would, after that, sign him to a multi year extension if we traded for him. We could definitely still pursue other needs
3. The DT class is loaded this year, and I think the CB class is underrated as well. For where the Packers are, I think those positions are more amenable to being addressed via the draft, whereas WR and DE I think would be better addressed by adding a veteran.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

March 09, 2025 at 11:21 am

The only problem is Metcalf reportedly wants his contract renegotiated NOW. And that typically happens with this type of trade - the old contract gets torn up and a new one negotiated. I wouldn't count on Metcalf costing $11MM in 2025.

0 points
0
0
RobinsonDavis's picture

March 09, 2025 at 12:01 pm

Why not do both? Trade for Metcalf and pick-up another WR later in the draft is my choice, but if Egbuka is there, when the Packers draft, there are worse decisions. Nick, I love the enthusiasm, but I simply am not giving up more than a 3rd round Pick and another player not named Watson for Metcalf. The next 2 years we will have to make decisions on our WRs anyways, and the market may get nuts. Lets see what happens with Free Agency first prior to locking in any decisions.

0 points
0
0
NickPerry's picture

March 09, 2025 at 12:24 pm

I see that side and actually agree. My concern is does Gutey go and get one of the few WR's in this draft? I'd much rather get Egbuka and not pay the 30 million. I just don't think Gute does that.

But I also don't think he'll go get Metcalf for the exact reasons you laid out. Like everyone I was really high on the WR group after the 2023 season. It's the 2024 season by the WR's and very little if any growth they displayed that has me super concerned.

They were a fingernail from 0-6 against the division last season. A fingernail! This year will be huge for Gutey. He better nail his picks and we better see growth from last years class (great class BTW) and hopefully the year before as well. New team president taking over. I'll be very curious what he does after the 2025 season.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

March 09, 2025 at 02:14 pm

After last year it is pretty clear the WR group needs some reinforcements and not just the return of Watson. Too many of the Packer receivers can't separate from man coverage and that is even more concerning for me than the dropped passes.

I don't know that Gute gets a veteran WR just because of the price tag, but I will be shocked if he doesn't spend a day one or day two pick on a WR. I don't know enough about the college WRs to identify who might be the target but the WR group needs an addition or two. Gute is usually pretty good at defining needs and filling them so the next two months should be interesting.

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

March 09, 2025 at 10:00 am

You give away too much and the team has too many holes for that kind of move. If the Packers just needed one piece to make a Super Bowl run I would say maybe but even then I am not in to pushing all the chips in on one move.

If you give up a 1st and 3rd and pay him $30M a year you took away a lot of resources to build the rest of the roster. DK is a good player but he isn't a dominate WR. He is fast in straight lines but has never been a guy who takes over games.

The contracts of Love and Metcalf would almost be 25% of the cap, you aren't going to win like that.

0 points
0
0
PackyCheese500's picture

March 09, 2025 at 10:58 am

The asking price for DK has been lowered to a 2nd round pick. We could probably get him for Doubs, a 3rd, and maybe a day 3 pick. Also his cap hit for this year is around 11m. A prospective new contract wouldn’t kick in till next season.

0 points
0
0
bjkdad44's picture

March 09, 2025 at 08:22 pm

Metcalf is gone… but not to the Packers… as usual…

0 points
0
0
PeteK's picture

March 09, 2025 at 10:07 am

I'm going for it all: CBs-- Adebo or Reed, WR--Keenan Allen ( 70 rec & 7 tds, knows the division and will teach youngsters ), and finally center--Dolman ( fits our zone blocking system is an excellent run blocker and solid in pass, graded 5th in PFF ).

0 points
0
0
PackyCheese500's picture

March 09, 2025 at 10:33 am

My prediction is that Gutey will go on another spending spree like ‘24 and ‘19. Every time Gutey has had a reasonable amount of cap space to work with, he’s always dipped rather significantly into free agency.

These are the FA players I think we should target:
WR: Davante Adams - he knows the MLF system and we need someone who can consistently beat man coverage, can help in the red zone, and doesn’t drop the ball. Even at 32, he’s by far the best FA out there at WR.
C: Brady Christensen - Christensen is a 5-position OL, but his best is Center, where he was the 9th best run blocker and 22nd best pass blocker, per PFF - big upgrades over Myers. He wouldn’t be too expensive and he’s also much better than the other FA centers (Dalman) at gap run blocking, which the Packers did more of with Jacobs.
DT: Calais Campbell - it would just be a 1-year deal, but this guy doesn’t seem to age at all. He had 5 sacks last year (would have been 3rd on the team) and PFF’s #1 defensive grade. An excellent #3 DT.
DE: Josh Sweat or Dayo Odeyingbo - Sweat has always had great pressure numbers, and he would add a speed element to GB’s pass rush that they currently lack. I would not mind if Gutey paid up to get him - he is a #1 DE and will get paid like it. His best year also came when he played about 60 pct of defensive snaps, so i don’t think LVN’s development would be stunted. Dayo I heard the Packers are interested in, and if they can’t get Sweat he’s a very intriguing player with a lot of upside and versatility.
CB: Paulson Adebo: I think signing an older CB to a big contract is a bad idea, and Adebo is just 25 and has the most upside. Coming off an injury he would not be too expensive either.

Also, Seattle has lowered their asking price for DK Metcalf to a 2nd round pick. I would not be opposed to that deal.

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

March 09, 2025 at 12:29 pm

Yes - the past has shown that when Gutekunst has an ample amount of cap space - he will spend it on free agents. This year should be no different. So my expectation is that he will sign anywhere from 2-4 free agents - comprising of :

A. 2 upper tier FAs
B. 1 upper tier + 2 mid-tiers
C. 3 mid tier + 1 lower tier
D. Any other permutation

0 points
0
0
Brewcity_BearsFan's picture

March 09, 2025 at 07:15 pm

Well, Adams and Metcalf have their new teams, and new deals

0 points
0
0
PhantomII's picture

March 09, 2025 at 04:09 pm

Ideally we trade Willis to Seattle strait across for WR1...Double down in the draft and get a top rated #1 WR with a move-up in the 1st RD.
Burn a 2026 #1 draft pick and a 2nd RD pick and go get the best DL we can. Pick up a better DL in FA and a FA CB1. The Browns just made an Elite FA DE untouchable any time soon. The cheaper route is beefing up the DL for a pass rush. Use the rest of the draft for OL and another CB...If we do these things...we will be able to go deeper in the playoffs and if we get the right FA's, we will be a much tougher out.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

March 09, 2025 at 04:25 pm

I wonder why there's been no talk of the Packers possibly signing Chris Godwin of the Buccaneers? He is the #1 free agent WR out there. Sounds like the Patriots are the team that is most likely to sign him. Godwin is 29 years old and is coming off an injury (dislocated ankle), but he was on pace for a career year after 7 games before he got hurt. I'm not saying the Packers should try to sign him, just that it seems like they might be interested.

0 points
0
0
Starrbrite's picture

March 09, 2025 at 04:30 pm

I like it GregC—he’s kinda been off the radar.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

March 09, 2025 at 05:14 pm

He played 60% of his snaps last year and they're full up there with Reed and Musgrave.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

March 09, 2025 at 06:07 pm

Yeah, he's mostly a slot receiver, although in 2023 they played him in the slot only 32% of the time, and he still had a productive year. Last year he went back to mostly slot. He's a lot bigger than Jayden Reed--two inches taller and about 20 pounds heavier, which gives him some more versatility. Maybe he wants to go to a team where he can play mostly in the slot, though, in which case the Packers are not the best place for him.

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

March 09, 2025 at 11:13 pm

Godwin does not meet the Packers free agent criteria - especially age.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

March 09, 2025 at 07:26 pm

This just in: DK Metcalf has been traded to the Steelers for a second round draft pick. He will sign a new contract: 4 years, $132 million.

TE Austin Hooper back with the Patriots for one year, $5 million. Some people wanted the Packers to go after him.

Aaron Jones signs a two-year deal to return to the Vikings.

0 points
0
0
PhantomII's picture

March 09, 2025 at 08:06 pm

WOW...WR's getting big money....GB better now use top 2 draft spots for WR, because what we got is not cutting it or draft a bunch of RB's and make them into WR's and some TE's and just run it heavy all the time. I don't see us signing any WR's we have now long term unless someone finally shows us he can play a consistent couple years at a high level...though I hope at least a couple do.

0 points
0
0
bjkdad44's picture

March 09, 2025 at 08:19 pm

Met calf is signed… not by the Packers though!…

0 points
0
0
gsd3's picture

March 10, 2025 at 05:57 am

Now that DK and Davonte are off the table I would look for Pittsburgh to trade Pickens. That's 2 deep ball guys. They need a chain mover / red zone type.
They both wear #14 as well. I could see Doubs and a 4th. Both teams get what they need. Personally, I could do without the drama that comes with Pickens. The pure talent is undeniable though.

0 points
0
0