Traits of a Successful 2025 Season for the Packers

As the Packers look to rebound from an early 2024 playoff bounce, a few characteristics will mark an improved season in 2025.

Over the past two decades, the Green Bay Packers have remained one of the more competitive teams in the NFL year after year.

However, over the past three decades, their sustained success has only translated into two Super Bowl victories.

Of course, that is still more than most teams can boast, and the Packers are one of 12 teams to win multiple Super Bowls in the past 30 years.

In fact, Green Bay has been a model example of stability and a level of consistency that is difficult to sustain in the NFL. Unfortunately, that has been marred by many disappointing and underwhelming finishes to promising seasons.

Most recently, the Packers saw a Super Bowl window close without adding to the trophy room as they navigated the final seasons with Aaron Rodgers and the preliminary seasons under Matt LaFleur.

Turn ahead the clock to the first two seasons with Jordan Love under center, and the Packers have realized a new Super Bowl window cracked open, hardly skipping a beat transitioning off of a future Hall of Fame quarterback.

Coming off being the youngest team in the NFL for the second consecutive year, the Packers created high expectations after an overachieving 2023. But similar to seasons past, the success translated into another underwhelming follow-up season to disrupt a promising ascent.

As the Packers turn their attention to the 2025 season, where they hope to put back into gear their climb toward a Super Bowl, the expectation for improvement has been voiced far and wide, even from the front office. Many remain split on the direction of the franchise or the required adjustments to get on track, but one thing is abundantly clear to everyone: the Packers need to take a significant step forward in 2025.

So what does that look like?

Improved consistency in the passing attack

Per Aaron Schatz of FTN Network, last season, the Packers led the NFL on throws to "other receivers" (not WR1 or WR2) with 36% of targets. That's the highest percentage of target share dating back to 1999.

In a season where the Packers ran the ball more than they have since 2003, spreading the ball around as much as they did not only led to an often out-of-sync passing attack but made it difficult for any of the Packers' talented young receivers to progress their development due to limited volume.

In fact, Jayden Reed's 55 catches were the fewest to lead the Packers in receptions since Donald Driver's 52 catches in 2003.

Simply put, there's nothing wrong with the Packers running the ball as much as they did due to their effectiveness. They could also have run more than expected due to Love being hobbled on a bad leg most of the season which had a clear impact on his play for a good stretch of the season.

But should the ground and pound trend continue, that leaves far fewer targets to go around when they do decide to pass, and thus, the Packer's offense would benefit greatly by dialing in on two or three players to disperse a majority of targets.

Without consistency for a receiver, there's less comfortability navigating within the offense, which leads to more miscues, drops, and difficulty for coaches to define who could potentially be "the guy." Last season, only Tucker Kraft and Reed were able to string together two straight games with at least four catches and 100-yard receiving games were few and far between.

Love never seemed to establish his go-to target in "gotta have it" situations, and too often, any given pass catcher would disappear throughout a game.

As the Packers enter an important year with their receiving room, with contract talks coming up, it will be important for Green Bay to establish more obvious focal points in the passing game to better complement a run-heavy scheme. This will go a long way for Love's rapport with his top weapons, the development of young pass catchers that Green Bay is figuring out who to build around, and allow the Packers offense to operate more efficiently as a whole.

For this to happen, LaFleur will need to take a hard look in the mirror at how he calls the offense, extend certain players' expanded roles, and allow guys to develop on the field through consistency rather than hoping someone emerges with a small handful of targets every game.

If Green Bay is able to take what is still a potent passing attack and refine it to match their offensive game plan, the offense should have fewer issues elevating and staying in stride throughout the season.

Young pass rushers step up

Lukas Van Ness and Devonte Wyatt are entering critical years in their time with the Packers. For Wyatt, the decision looms large on whether the Packers will pick up his fifth-year option. Even if he's extended the fifth year, he's still not showcased enough meaningful play to be a guarantee long-term.

Wyatt has been disruptive in getting after the quarterback, racking up at least five sacks in each of the last two seasons despite playing a measly 362 snaps last season. Regardless of the lackluster run defense out of Wyatt, there's no denying that he could be a larger snap share away from being a premier force up the middle in pass rush. Each year, there are only a few defensive tackles putting up double-digit sack numbers. Otherwise, the top sack producers at the position are barely out-producing Wyatt but are far out-snapping him.

In the case of Van Ness, he enters critical year three in his development, during which the Packers will realistically expect him to make the jump in his game after a slow start to his career as he worked on his craft in limited game reps.

For both players, of which Green Bay invested premium first-round draft capital, 2025 will not only be critical for their development, but their improvements will go a long way towards Green Bay's defense improving altogether.

Van Ness, for whatever reason, has had about the most obscure, outlier usage for a top-15 pick in recent memory. Not only does he have the fifth fewest snaps among all 2023 first-rounders, but he's also the only first-rounder since 2020 with 100+ special teams snaps in each of his first two seasons and 200+ special teams snaps in a season before year three.

Green Bay would be wise to at least see what they have in Van Ness because the usage nowhere near parallels the investment to this point. As of now, he has not finished a season with even 40% of the snaps.

Rashan Gary walked a similar path to Van Ness in his first two seasons, playing behind Preston and Za'Darius Smith before breaking out in year three with an 88.9 PFF pass-rush grade (8th) in his first season as a full-time starter. In the case of LVN, and similar to Wyatt, it could be as simple as giving him a reasonable amount of snaps to turn him into an important contributor on the defense.

With the Packers having not yet pursued an outside player to come in to improve the pass rush, and with any rookie being no sure bet to be an improvement or an upgrade, their best bet and intentions seem to be to lean into Van Ness, Wyatt, and the new defensive line coaching that is more focused on technique. Sometimes, it's those simple changes that are all it takes to get a player's career on track.

If they can get more out of both Wyatt and Van Ness in 2025, that will be a tremendous win for next season and many years to come. Not to mention help validate Brian Gutekunst's first-round draft plan that could use a win after a handful of underwhelming picks recently.

No, it's not Super Bowl or bust

But yes, the expectation should always be to go into a season expecting to win a Super Bowl.

The Packers' renewed Super Bowl window has only just opened, and it's far from fully open. Jordan Love is only two years into starting, most of their starters are playing on rookie contracts, and an immensely improved defense is only entering its second season after a top-10 performance under first-year coordinator Jeff Hafley.

Simply put, the Packers' current group is nowhere near its ceiling, and the additions of All-Pros Josh Jacobs and Xavier McKinney last season have only pushed that ceiling higher.

It's teams like the Buffalo Bills, who have spent four of the past five post-seasons getting bounced by the Kansas City Chiefs despite Josh Allen playing MVP-level quarterback, that are knocking at the door of Super Bowl or bust. Or the San Francisco 49ers with their group of "Avengers" that is aging and has started disbanding without securing another Lombardi Trophy before now looking to spend top dollar on Brock Purdy with question marks around what he's capable of without All-Pros all over the offense.

Even the Detroit Lions are entering more trepidatious waters after fumbling the bag with Ben Johnson calling plays for what has been a top offensive team over the past three seasons. With losing Johnson inside the division to the Chicago Bears and losing defensive coordinator Aaron Glenn to the New York Jets, the Lions are faced with a season of sky-high expectations but two brand new play callers.

For the Packers, a key indicator of success will be getting over their own hump and back into the NFC Championship game. That's not settling for less than a Super Bowl; a championship game appearance is instead a low-end target to aim for to consider 2025 a considerable step forward from the first two seasons with Love. Achieving what is essentially a "final four" appearance in the NFL will be a measuring stick for where the Packers roster is at after a disappointing finish to 2024 and what final tweaks would be necessary to then get back to the big game.

But by no means have the Packers reached the doorstep of Super Bowl or bust.

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Based in Seattle, Austin's roots are in Wisconsin and he bleeds Green & Gold. He also currently writes for Lombardi Ave and has been featured on various Packers podcasts. Follow him on Twitter at @AustinKrueger_.

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (36)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Coldworld's picture

April 02, 2025 at 10:52 am

You say our current group is nowhere near its ceiling. That may well be true of Love, Tom, Kraft, McKinney and we are a young team, but how long is the window for other key pieces: Clark, Jacobs, Gary, for example. Will Van Ness, Wyatt, Q Walker ever hit their hoped for peaks or will they fade away after this year? How many current WRs will get a second deal?

We don’t have a long window with the roster before a period of renewal. Yes a core will be there, but the current low level of turnover is not going to sustain through 2027. We need to find fixes now for this year and next in reality and hopefully roll in some new standouts to keep the window going.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

April 02, 2025 at 11:03 am

Our window, the Love Window, is open for a few years.

Last year, in every game we lost, I had the profound feeling that the Packers ended up beating themselves. That's to be expected, to an extent, when you're playing youngsters, but it's time for them to grow up now. No more excuses for dropped passes, untimely penalties, etc.

The Packers CAN win the Super Bowl this year, if they just don't go out there and beat themselves.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 02, 2025 at 11:18 am

I think the roster is not that far off. I am concerned about the DL in terms of fit and approach, as much talent. I am concerned about WR, with the loss of Watson and Doubs concussions and contracts nearing their ends: renewal there needs to happen.

I’m more sanguine than most at CB and in the OL. I see us as better there now and dealing with relatively normal needs to restock or superable contract pressures. What we need now is to see this offense function more smoothly and consistently, which needs to come from LaFleur. That’s the overarching goal and I think he needs a little help at WR now, but that Banks will help, potentially Lloyd too. A good blocking TE behind Musgrave and Kraft would free up more weapons and options, but ultimately LaFleur has to show he can deliver a winning O, especially if he has those pieces.

There was more talent out there than his offense delivered. That has to stop. He has to prove it this year. Hafley needs to continue and a better base rush should be a big boost to his chances. At this point though, LaFleur has to show he is real. If he does then we can be a factor, particularly if Gute gets him the seemingly obvious missing pieces in a draft that looks perfectly aligned for DT, DE and X and Z WRs.

0 points
0
0
AustinKrueger's picture

April 02, 2025 at 11:30 am

I agree that something has to start kicking into gear. While the Super Bowl window with Love is still fresh, the point of who knows what this team will look like in 2, 3, or 4 years is exactly it. There might be no McKinney or Jacobs or other top starters, and Green Bay will likely have to have modified most of their roster by then. Would be a damn shame to get nothing out of the current group that they assembled to specifically be at its peak over the next two seasons.

What's most frustrating is how LVN has been used and the impact of not having instead selected a player to provide meaningful contributions to the team yet. He's the only top-15 pick in recent history to log 50% of special teams snaps in one of his first two seasons. He's an extremely rare outlier in that sense. Meanwhile, he hasn't logged even 40% of defensive snaps yet. Something drastic has to change with him and hoping Covington gets him on track to start to validate using pick 13 on him! Would be a massive jolt

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

April 02, 2025 at 12:04 pm

One trick pony bull rushers get quickly neutralized by NFL O lineman and don't get the volume of snaps, being too predictable.

This was the concern I had for LVN before and after he was drafted. And the concern is near a tipping point Covington will be charged to straighten up.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

April 02, 2025 at 12:52 pm

In four years, if Love hasn't gotten to the Super Bowl,it'll be time to shuffle the deck. QBs who haven't won a Super Bowl by 30 or so rarely win one after.

Plus the turnover at the WR spot. Plus Jacobs WILL get older. Many of the key pieces we have right now won't be around in a few years.

I think we have a good starting line, starting QB and backup, RB and backup, TE and backup. We really only have 3 WRs and they are question marks, and that's why I've beaten the drum since Day 1 that we need to improve the weaponry and score more points in these elimination games. You can have an off day in the regular season, but never in the playoffs.

As regards Van Ness....the Packers run a 60/40 rotation at their DE spots. Gary starts at one DE, and Preston Smith was the other before he was traded. AFter the trade, Van Ness and Enagbare essentially split that position.

He's 23 years old and has accomplished much more in two years than the legendary Josh Sweat did. He's a solid player for us.

I think if you use pick 13 on a guy who stays healthy for every game and improves each year, that's a pretty good ROI. It's not always that good.

0 points
0
0
TarynsEyes's picture

April 02, 2025 at 12:02 pm

"Last year, in every game we lost, I had the profound feeling that the Packers ended up beating themselves".

When you play as badly as they have against .500 and better teams, it's hard to accept the self flogging mentality. Just admit it, for once, the talent and ability levels, player and coaching, aren't what is optimistically believed.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

April 02, 2025 at 12:58 pm

IF they played THAT badly, why were the games so close? Were the Packers so good that they could play badly and still keep it that close? ESPECIALLY if our talent and our coaching aren't very good?

I'm having trouble de-pretzelizing this. A team without very good talent, and poor coaching, can go out and play badly and keep it close against the best teams in the league, and go 10-1 against the rest of the NFL???

You think this adds up? I don't. I think the better explanation is that we have good coaching and players who had some less-than-perfect moments.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 02, 2025 at 01:01 pm

I think you overestimate how close those contest really were.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

April 02, 2025 at 04:33 pm

I think you underestimate how good the Packers were, and how close they are. Put Watson, Doubs, Reed, Morgan, and Jenkins on the field and see if that makes a difference. Maybe without that bad opening , it's a one-play game.

I'll say this again, even though people downvote it: If you're a bad team, with bad players, and bad coaches, you don't play the top teams that close, and you don't go 10-1 against everybody else. It doesn't add up.

0 points
0
0
TarynsEyes's picture

April 02, 2025 at 08:56 pm

Nobody said that they're bad, what is being implied is that they're not as good as you want to believe they are. What doesn't add up? They lost to teams with winning records and won against teams with losing records. Here again is an example of something not being what it seems.

Your record is said to say what you are, and I don't abide by that thinking. The Packers are proof of it. The won 10 games, and yet, looked like the teams they beat when playing the better. The Packers beat the lesser of their level, and that doesn't make them good, it just allows them to qualify to get beat by better, again in the playoffs.

That might make you incredibly happy, but it isn't winning when it matters and for what matters. It's a participation level awarded to the better of the losers. You have to beat the good to be deemed worthy of good, they didn't. Maybe this season changes.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 03, 2025 at 08:07 am

“Beating themselves” is essentially saying that the team on the field was better than its results.

In other words that the team is not living up to the potential of its roster as a whole and not getting the most from key players. That is a pretty direct and severe indictment of the coaching.

0 points
0
0
TarynsEyes's picture

April 02, 2025 at 01:15 pm

Like stats, the final score of a game doesn't always tell the story. Getting outplayed or out coached isn't always reflective in the score. I'll just say this, there are those who simply do not account for prevent Defenses, garbage time scores, etc, that make a game closer than it was, and it would appear you'd be one of them. That stuff matters to those who bet, but to a fan, it's a reality that must be seen, and accepted to see what needs to be fixed. If the Org sees it your way, status quo becomes the standard, and this team is getting bogged down by it.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

April 02, 2025 at 04:36 pm

No, the final score tells the final story.

You're asking me to believe that you can get outcoached and outplayed.....when you've already got bad players.....and still be right there at the end with a chance to win at the end (which is all you can ever really ask for ).

My friend, Dan, would call that Pretzel Logic.

0 points
0
0
LeotisHarris's picture

April 02, 2025 at 09:35 pm

Get along, Kid Charlemagne.

0 points
0
0
PhantomII's picture

April 02, 2025 at 09:56 pm

GB needs a #1 and #2 WR either a better pass rush from DE and or DL to win it all. If Gute drafts a couple better WR's and a stud DL..and JL plays better we could be in it...let's hope so. otherwise were lucky to split the Division.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

April 02, 2025 at 02:53 pm

They need a couple or three rookies to come in and contribute(DT, WR, CB).but more than anything they need a couple of good young rookies to become stars. Kraft and Cooper are halfway there but if a couple more youngsters became impact players and Love cleaned a thing or two up and stays healthy they could contend with the top NFC teams.

Disagree on the OL. Can't expect the unusual health from last year to happen two years in a row.

0 points
0
0
splitpea1's picture

April 02, 2025 at 11:15 am

IMHO, the traits of a successful season would be to sort through the hodgepodge of talent across the team and for some stars, or at least the top options, to emerge. In some position groups we already know those top players, such as TE, S, RB, LB, and OL. But there are still lots of questions at CB, DL, and WR, and we'll just have to ferret through our existing options (do it quickly) as we add new draft picks. There was some discussion about trading back earlier, but I think this is a draft where we should be after quality over quantity--while making sure the floor is high enough so we're not stuck with more prospects who take a long time to develop.

Another thing that will determine a successful season is the development of a quick passing game that can be counted on when needed. Maybe MLF can curtail the ground and pound a bit and emphasize this more. I'd like to see Love improve his accuracy as well; that could be chalked up as a big success.

Marshawn Lloyd staying healthy and contributing would be a success. We all want to see what we have here, which is hopefully to bring some more electricity to this offense.

Not forgetting the obvious, we need to win more games within the division for the upcoming season to be successful.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

April 02, 2025 at 11:51 am

Why do I keep seeing this same picture of Hafley with his mouth hanging open? It's almost as bad as the picture of Sean Rhyan lying on his belly that they used to show all the time.

Anyway, I think the main reason for the lack of a go-to guy (or a pair of go-to guys) in the passing game is a lack of talent. I thought Christian Watson was maybe starting to emerge late in 2024, then he blew out his knee. Without Watson, they are not going to have a clear #1 receiver in 2025, but I hope they can draft a WR in the first or second round who can make an impact as a rookie and maybe emerge as a #1 in his second season. That's the best we can hope for at this point.

Van Ness got passed up by Kingsley Enagbare and Brenton Cox last year, and the Packers may add a highly drafted rookie to the mix. Van Ness will need to have a really good training camp to justify an increased snap count. I think he should have to earn it.

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

April 02, 2025 at 11:56 am

I think at this point in the offseason a good goal to start with is to come out strong and win the first few games while improving evolving and innovating. That will open the Super Bowl window.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

April 02, 2025 at 12:08 pm

I wish they would finally start fast too. Under LaFleur, who barely plays starters in the preseason, they don't though.

I believe this was part of BG's call for "more urgency" for the team...not for adding multiple free agents.

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

April 02, 2025 at 02:16 pm

You can at least add it to the urgent list. Urgent is the definition of the NFL offseason for every team and coach's/GMs job or should be.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

April 02, 2025 at 07:17 pm

I think it's hard to maintain urgent without getting exhausted. This is a long, grueling season and it only started two weeks ago.

Look at this team versus the one we had at the start of the 2023 seasons

We've added McKinney and Bullard and Williams and Cooper and Hobbs to the defense. We've added Morgan and Banks and Jacobs and Willis and Glover and Monk to the offense.

IMO, we're substantially stronger than we were heading into the draft last year. The only real negatives are the hole at DT and at WR, and we have the draft for that.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

April 02, 2025 at 07:09 pm

In retrospect, how did his policy of not playing starters in the preseason work? We looked plenty rusty in the opener, but we were 2-1 after 3 games.

Did it affect our injury situation? I'm under the impression that most of our starters were available for most of our games. We had 11 guys who started all 17 games, and 14 more who suited up all 17 games. That's 31 guys out of the 45 we dress. Beyond that, we had another 10 who played in at least 15 games. Other than Alexander and Morgan, nobody missed many games.

With results like that, it makes it hard to justify playing starters in the preseason. I expect we'll do it the same way this exhibition season.

0 points
0
0
TarynsEyes's picture

April 02, 2025 at 12:11 pm

"Turn ahead the clock to the first two seasons with Jordan Love under center, and the Packers have realized a new Super Bowl window cracked open, hardly skipping a beat transitioning off of a future Hall of Fame quarterback".

The Love SB window may be cracked open, but it certainly isn't opened the same way it was before him. This new window is opened just a sliver in comparison because the Division and a few teams have caught up to them, and in most cases, have surpassed them. Talk about this window opening being substantial when they get to an NFCCG. Getting in last and leaving first isn't really an open SB window, but thinking you grabbed the last chair in musical chairs, only to see it kicked out for under you before you even sat in it.

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

April 02, 2025 at 01:47 pm

Nice analogy.

0 points
0
0
LeotisHarris's picture

April 02, 2025 at 03:41 pm

Taryn, you're in a groove as of late. Great post!

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

April 02, 2025 at 12:26 pm

I like Matt LaFleur as a man. Smart, creative, personable.

But as a HC I am doubting his leadership. He is very timid making personnel decisions. I believe he is adverse to "hurting feelings"...players and coaches. Avoids confrontation. He is a very status quo guy. I note when Alexander got all grumpy and discordant in '23 it was Gutey, not LaFleur who did the discipline.

I believe he demands Love "spread the ball around" to WRs after the Rodgers/Adams constant targets he was afraid to change. Keep everybody happy. I can understand the motive but I agree with Austin the Packer WRs are more jack of all trades to run all routes but no "Masters" emerging. The game reps for them are just as important for the QB who throws to them. Love needs to develop a more solid chemistry with a WR or two...not 5.

I don't buy the drops are a "focus problem" either... seemingly indicting the players. Focus comes from practice and training. Most employees respect what employers inspect.

Hafley looked at the DL coaching operation and found it lacking...made a change. Offense status quo again. Even if you are on the right track you will get run over is you just sit there.

Depends what happens to the GM job responsibilities in July, I believe LaFleur's seat is going to be warm this season. We already have a coach on the team getting HC candidate notice.

0 points
0
0
13TimeChamps's picture

April 02, 2025 at 12:42 pm

I think the one undeniable question that needs to be answered in '25 is what exactly do we have in Jordan Love. Is he a top 5 QB? Top 10? Top 15? After 5 seasons...2 as a starter...he has had one half of one season where he played at an elite level. Other than that, he's been very inconsistent. To be fair, there have been mitigating factors. Injuries. Inordinate number of dropped passes. This is the year he needs to put it all together to be legitimately considered a top 5-10 NFL QB.

0 points
0
0
barutanseijin's picture

April 03, 2025 at 04:17 pm

I kinda think he is what he is. I expect more inconsistency. Hope. i’m wrong.

0 points
0
0
D_Dave_Wittmann's picture

April 02, 2025 at 12:49 pm

Establish more obvious focal points in the passing game?
They better not be obvious to the other team's defense play caller!

0 points
0
0
TXCHEESE's picture

April 02, 2025 at 04:36 pm

I think we'll know a successful season when we see it. Last year GB won some games handily, but against below average competition, and outside of San Palo, they didn't look like they were on the same level as Detroit, Minny, and Philly the 2nd time. Games were somewhat close and winnable, BUT they didn't win any of them. Outside of those 3, GB beat, but not convincingly, some decent teams, but none of those wins convinced me they were ramping up for big things in the post season. I know it's hard to win in the NFL, but you have to dominate someone other than the punching bags from time to time.

When GB plays consistently good football for a full game, and can repeat it often, then we can say GB is on their way to a successful season. Otherwise, we will end up wondering weekly which GB team is going to show up.

0 points
0
0
cdoemel's picture

April 03, 2025 at 02:01 am

Oh my god. Here we go. The draft isn’t even here yet and we got all the doubters out shaking their heads. Even given last year, this team is way closer than it’s not. Can’t we at least see them in pads before the requisite gloom and doom starts? Cheezits!

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

April 03, 2025 at 10:49 am

I don't see this team as close to contending for a Super Bowl. Sure they had a nice record last year but in the NFL you have to look at who you are playing and when you played them as well. The best wins last year came vs the Rams and Texans, both of whom dealt with injuries at the time and weren't playing very good football at the time. They had a record of 11-6 but where 2-5 vs playoff teams.

I do see the Lions and Vikings taking a step back so I see them competing inside the division but I don't think this division is as strong as their records indicate. All 3 of the teams got bounced in their 1st game. I would still take the Lions to win the division and the Vikings are a wild card with JJ McCarthy going to start for them.

This team has a ways to go and a lot of wholes to fill. The run game is solid but the passing game won't keep up with the best. The defense is good when facing bad teams but fails to disrupt the better offenses.

0 points
0
0
barutanseijin's picture

April 03, 2025 at 04:19 pm

Pretty sure all the wholes are already filled. Just have to worry about what’s not whole.

0 points
0
0
THESZOTMAN1's picture

April 03, 2025 at 07:12 pm

Austin: Good article, BUT:
I don't understand your disdain for "ground and pound." In 2003, the year you cite, the Pack went 10-6 and won a Wild Card game. What's wrong with that? And us old farts remember when the Pack won 5 championships on the backs of Taylor, Hornung, et.al. As far as today's passing game, it seems to me that more of Jacobs. Wilson, and Brooks (and maybe Lloyd) should make play action much more effective and keep the rush off Love.
Run the $#@! ball!
The Szotman

0 points
0
0